This article elaborates the concept, meaning and role of clinical pathway, discusses development stages and implementation effects of clinical pathway at home and abroad, and proposes that clinical pathway has been developed very well abroad, but it still has many problems in domestic gtowth which needs to be put into effect with Single-DRGs system in combination.
N-of-1 trial design offers a methodologically sound approach to determining optimum treatment for an individual patient and solves some limitations of randomized controlled trials. This design could offer an efficient method of reaching a personal treatment regime tailored to suit individual needs and preferences. The paper introduces practical application, objects and the implementation process of N-of-1 trial, to explore its design points and implementation.
Objective To evaluate the implementation effects and problems about quota payment of specific diseases for hyperplasia prostate and ureteral calculi in Chengdu. Methods Payments, man-time of operation, and the lengths of hospitalization of hyperplasia prostate and ureteral calculi as quota payment of specific diseases in Chengdu from 2013 to 2015 were analyzed by using SPSS 16.0 software. Results Based on the standards of medical expense limitation in Chengdu unchanged, tertiary and secondary hospitals remained surplus with quota standards of single diseases unchanged. The average lengths of hospitalization of hyperplasia prostate and ureteral calculi in tertiary and secondary hospitals were significantly decreased (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of quota payment policy for single disease in Chengdu city of Sichuan province has been proved to work on controlling the medical expense of treating hyperplasia prostate and ureteral calculi. Our results indicate the continuous implementation of quota payment policy. However, the exploration of proper payment standardization, enhance of hospital supervision and establishment of efficient system are still needed to define.
Objective To summarize the role and implementation effect of risk management in Ophthalmic Day Surgery Center. Methods Since the establishment of Ophthalmic Day Surgery Center on October 8th, 2012, risk management was implemented in the aspects of hardware management, post setting, file management, operating process, service, etc., and the adverse events occurred in the period were analyzed to find out the defectiveness and hidden dangers in the working process, and then refined intervention measures were put forward and carried out. The surgical amount, occurrence of nosocomial infections and nursing adverse events, and patients satisfaction from October 8th, 2012 to June 30th, 2015 were analyzed. Results During this period, 52 073 ambulatory operations were completed, with no nosocomial infection and 2 cases of nursing adverse events. The patients satisfaction in 2013, 2014, and 2015 was 98.09%, 98.22%, and 99.85%, respectively. Conclusion The implementation of risk management in Ophthalmic Day Surgery Center can effectively reduce the occurrence of adverse events in nursing work, improve work efficiency, help to establish and improve the nursing security environment, improve the nurse-patient relationship, and improve patients satisfaction.
With the encouragement of national policy on drug and medical device innovation, multi-center clinical trials and multi-regional clinical trials are facing an unprecedented opportunity in China. Trials with a multi-center design are far more common at present than before. However, it should be recognized there still exists shortcomings in current multi-center trials. In this paper, we summarize the problems and challenges and provide corresponding resolutions with the aim to reduce heterogeneity between study centers and avoid excessive center effects in treatment. It is urgent to develop design, implementation and reporting guidelines to improve the overall quality of multi-center clinical trials.
To standardize and improve the reporting quality of implementation studies, BMJ published the standards for reporting implementation studies (StaRI). This paper introduces the background and process of StaRI development, and interprets the core content of StaRI. It is expected that StaRI will provide support for domestic researchers to carry out implementation studies and writing implementation research reports.
As evidence-based practice (EBP) continues to be valued, the guideline implementation has become an important field for research and practice in health care. In order to better guide the guideline implementation in the field of health care, this paper combines the EBP experience gained from several EBP programs carried out in our hospital those years, in aim of exploring and sharing the methodology of guideline implementation in domestic clinical settings.
Implementation science is a relatively emergent and growing research area. Implementation research can assist to transform what is possible in theory to reality in practice and address the challenge of implementing proven interventions in the real world. Implementation research has a wide range of usages and complex research problems, so appropriate research methods, designs, and outcomes variables are required to address different research objectives. To better conduct implementation research, this paper systematically introduces the research designs, outcome variables, and reporting guideline of the implementation research in health care, based on the purposes and research questions of implementation research.
Implementation science is a new field that aims to scale up and sustain the application of evidence-based practice. It primarily studies the dissemination, adoption, evaluation, and improvement, etc. of the implementation process of evidence-based practice. In recent years, tens of implementation theories, frameworks and models have been developed. We systematically collected 41 of them and classified them into several categories. The first is the classical theories which are extended from the traditional social science and used as the predecessors of the implementation science. The second category is the implementation science frameworks/models that are derived from the first category, and can be divided into four groups: 1) the implementation models that explain the law of a certain aspect in the implementation; 2) the implementation determinants frameworks that summarize and classify the implementation determinants; 3) the process models that discuss how research translates into practice; 4) the evaluation models that evaluate the implementation and outcome. The implementation science theories can provide implementation researchers with valuable guidance for development of implementation strategies and evaluation of implementation outcomes.
The consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) extracted, analyzed and integrated many published theories, frameworks and models of implementation research, and provided a comprehensive and practical theoretical framework for researchers to explore the influencing factors in the implementation of evidence. This paper introduces the origin, core content and application examples of CFIR in evidence-based nursing practice, in order to provide reference for researchers to use CFIR to carry out implementation research.