Objective To assess the anal sphincteric function after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer by vectorial manometry. Methods Maximal anal pressure, vector volume, vector symmetric index and rectal anal inhibitory reflex were assessed in 16 patients underwent intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer from 1999 to 2006. Thirty patients with low anterior resection for rectal cancer and another 30 healthy individuals were selected as control. Results The patients in intersphincteric resection group were subdivided into soiling group and defecation function good group. Maximal pressure, vector volume and vector symmetric index of the patients in soiling group and defecation function good group were significantly lower than those of the healthy and low anterior resection controls (P＜0.001). The maximal systole pressure, systole vector volume and vector symmetric index in soiling group were significantly lower than those in function good group (P＜0.001). The 25.0% patients in intersphincteric resection group had rectal anal inhibitory reflex， was significantly lower than that of the low anterior resection control group (93.3%, P＜0.001). Conclusion The maximal pressure and vector volume are compromised in patients underwent intersphincteric resection . The vectorial manometry can be an objective comprehensive tool for the evaluation of anal sphincter function in patients with intersphincteric resection.
Objective To evaluate the impact of body mass index （BMI） on short-term outcomes after intersphi-ncteric resection （ISR） for rectal cancer and anal cancer. Methods One hundred and ninety-nine cases of rectal cancer and anal cancer who were treated in Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of West China Hospital of Sichuan University from Jan. 2009 to Dec. 2011 were enrolled retrospectively，and these cases were divided into underweight group （n=23），normal group （n=114），and overweight group （n=62） according to BMI. Postoperative indexes in early rehabilitation and complication of 3 groups were studied and compared. Results On the recovery indexes after ISR in early stage，there were no significant differences on the duration of first flatus，first defecation，first oral intake，first ambulation，and hospital stay among 3 groups （P＞0.05）. On the tube management，there were no significant differences on the duration of pulling out nasogastric tube and urinary catheter （P＞0.05），but duration of pulling out drain was longer in normal group and over-weight group （P＜0.05）. There were no significant differences on the incidence of postoperative complications among the 3 groups （P＞0.05），including anastomotic leakage，anastomotic bleeding，perianal infection，ileus，gastric retention，urinary retention， septicemia，wound infection，and recto-vaginal fistula. Conclusions BMI has little impact on short-term outcomes after ISR. Obesity does not increase the incidence of common complications for patients after ISR and does not influence recovery indexes with proper postoperative managements.
Objective To determine the oncological outcomes following the intersphincteric resection (ISR) for lower rectal cancer and influencing factors. Methods Reviewed the reports on ISR for lower rectal cancer, and summarized the oncological outcomes and influencing factors. The oncological outcomes included local and distant recurrence rates, postoperative survival, and mortality rates. Tumor indicators, surgical techniques, and perioperative radiochemotherapy were included in the influencing factors. Results The recurrence, survival, and mortality rates following ISR resemble traditional operations. Higher stages, metastasis, and non-standard operations affect the oncological outcomes significantly. Preoperative radiochemotherapy could improve the efficacy, but probably at the cost of postoperative anal function. Conclusions The oncological outcomes following ISR are acceptable. The careful case selection and rational arrangements of radiochemotherapy will allow better outcomes.
Objective To approach the curative effect of laparoscopic rectum resection combined with per anus intersphincteric rectal dissection and colo anal anastomosis for patients with ultra-low rectal cancer. Methods Thirteen patients were prospectively studied from June 2005 to December 2007. There were 8 male and 5 female patients, with a mean age of 53 (range, 41-69) years. All the tumors located less than 5 cm above the anal verge. All the patients were treated with general anaesthesia and then went through the following procedures: lied the reverse Trendelenburg reforming lithotomy position, the laparoscope went inside the abdomen through two apertures, the hylus aperture (observing aperture) and the McBurney point aperture (main performing aperture). After the resection through the laparoscope, the operation was translocated to the perineal region, the anus was enlarged to expose the operation area. Results The operation on all cases succeeded, there was no operative mortality, and no stomal leak in all patients. The follow-up duration ranged from 1 to 30 months (mean 17 months). Up to now, one patient developed recurrence in pelvic cavity, and one suffered hepatic metastasis, there was no port-site implantation metastasis， 9 patients had satisfactory functional recovery of anus in the sixth month after operation. Conclusion The therapy laparoscopic rectum resection combined with per anus intersphincteric rectal dissection and colo-anal anastomosis for patients with ultra-low rectal cancer is a safe, minimally invasive, anal-preserving technique with reliablity in curative effect and satisfaction in anal sphincter function.
ObjectiveTo compare anal function and quality of life between partial longitudinal resection of the anorectum and sphincter (PLRAS) and intersphincteric resection (ISR) for rectal cancer. MethodsNinety-nine cases of very low rectal cancer were classified as PLRAS group (n=23) and ISR group (n=76) according to different surgical method. Anal function was assessed by Saito function questionnaire and the Wexner scale in 6, 12, and 24 months after operation. At the same time, quality of life was assessed by European Organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire CR29 (EORTC-QLQ-CR29). Results①Anastomosis stenosis:compared with ISR group, the situation on anastomosis stenosis was worse in 6 months (P < 0.001) and 12 months (P=0.003) after operation, but didn't significantly differed in 24 months after operation (P=0.230).②Results of the Saito function questionnaire:compared with ISR group, there were higher incidence on stool fragmentation (P=0.016), dyschesia (P=0.008), and feces-flatus discrimination (P < 0.001) in PLRAS group in 6 months after operation, and the incidence of feces-flatus discrimination was still higher in 12 months (P=0.017), but there was no any significant difference in 24 months after operation (P > 0.05).③Results of Wexner scale:there were no statistical difference between the 2 groups at all recorded times (P > 0.05).④Results of EORTC-QLQ-CR29 questionnaire:in 6 months after operation, the scores of flatulence (P=0.003), faecal incontinence (P=0.043), and sexual interest in women (P=0.023) of PLARS group were lower than ISR group but higher in buttock pain (P=0.031) and dyspareunia (P=0.006). In 12 months after operation, the scores of flatulence (P=0.012) and sexual interest in women (P=0.017) were both lower than ISR group, but score of dyspareunia was higher (P=0.012). In 24 months after operation, there was no any significant difference (P > 0.05). ConclusionsPLRAS surgery have worse situation of anastomosis stenosis and sexual function in women than ISR surgery before 12 months after operation, but have analogous effect in 24 months after operation.
ObjectiveTo analyze the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection with stapled colo-anal anastomosis under direct vision for low rectal cancer. MethodsFrom January 2001 to March 2012, 138 patients were underwent intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer, 45 cases of whom were received laparoscopic surgery and stapled colo-anal anastomosis (SCAA group), and the other 93 cases (55 open and 38 laparoscopic) of whom were received hand-sewn colo-anal anastomosis (HCAA group). The morbidity comparison only involed the data of relevant to the anastomosis. The anus functional outcomes, including those from the Saito function questionnaire and Wexner score, were compared and only involved the data of relevant to the laparoscope. Results①The anastomotic complications rates were similar for the fistula, bleeding, and rectal mucosal prolapse (P > 0.05); the rate of anastomosis leakage and the degree of anastomotic stricture in the SCAA group were significantly lower (or milder) than those in the HCAA group (P=0.001 and P=0.022, respectively).②As for the functional results, the incidence of dyschesia in the SCAA group was significantly lower than that in the HCAA group (P=0.016), and the other 7 items of Saito function questionnaire and Wexner score were similar between these two groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionsCompared with traditional intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer, laparoscopic surgery with stapled colo-anal anastomosis could reduce the morbidity and the anus function is non-inferior to the former.
ObjectiveThe low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score is a simple and visual instrument assessing sphincter preserving surgery for low rectal cancer. The purpose of this study is to analyze the feasibility of using LARS score to assess the function after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. MethodsBetween March 2013 and June 2015, 76 patients underwent sphincter preserving surgery for low rectal cancer, 23 cases underwent intersphincteric resection set as ISR group, the other 53 cases received low anterior resection set as LAR group. LARS score, Saito function questionnaire, Wexner score, and European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire core 30 (QLQ-C30), questionnaire module for colorectal cancer (QLQ-CR29) were compared for the two groups. ResultsThere were 63.2 percent patients (48/76) appeared major LARS, 27.6 percent (21/76) minor LARS and 9.2 percent (7/76) no LARS, there were no statistically difference between the ISR and LAR groups (P=0.727), but the item of incontinence due to liquid stools appeared more obvious in ISR group (P=0.009). The items of faecel incontinence and sore skin for EORTC QLQ-CR29 were serious in ISR group (P < 0.05), the other item of EORTC QLQ-CR29 and EORTC QLQ-C30, Saito function questionnaire, Wexner score were similar between the two groups (all P > 0.05). ConclusionThe anal function after intersphincteric resection is non-inferior to the low anterior resection for low rectal cancer, but both can appear serious low anterior resection syndrome.