ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) with PPV combined ILM peeling for macular hole retinal detachment (MHRD) in high myopia.MethodsA retrospective clinical study. From October 2012 to January 2019, 78 patients (78 eyes) with high myopia macular hole retinal detachment diagnosed from Chongqing Aier Eye Hospital and Hefei Aier Eye Hospital were included in the study. Among them, there were 11 males (11 eyes) and 67 females (67 eyes) with the average age of 55.6±9.6 years. All patients underwent BCVA, diopter, OCT examination and axial length (AL) measurement. The standard logarithmic visual acuity chart was used for BCVA examination, and the visual acuity was converted to logMAR when recorded. Patients were divided into PPV combined with ILM peeling group (ILM peeling group) and PPV combined with ILM inverted group (ILM inverted group) according to the surgical method, with 51 patients (51 eyes) and 27 patients (27 eyes), respectively. The average age (t=－1.170), diopter (t=0.504), AL (t=0.474), logMAR BCVA (t=0.935), and hole diameter (t=－0.334) of the two groups were compared, and there was no statistically significant difference (P＞0.05). Two independent sample t test was used to compare the exposed distance of BCVA and RPE before and after the operation of the two groups of eyes. The χ2 test was used to compare the rates between the two groups.ResultsAt the last follow-up, the logMAR BCVA of the eyes in the ILM inverted group and ILM peeling group were 0.87±0.27 and 1.45±0.39, respectively. Compared with pre-operation, the BCVA of the two groups of eyes were significantly improved, and the difference was statistically significant (t=8.790, 4.640, P＜0.001,＜0.001). The logMAR BCVA of the two groups of eyes was compared with statistical significance (t=6.830, P＜0.001). The exposed RPE distances of the eyes in the ILM inverted group and the inner limiting membrane peeling group were 31.81±23.52 and 681.80±466.61 μm, respectively. the difference in the RPE exposure distance between the two groups was statistically significant (t=7.180, P＜0.001). The holes in the 27 eyes in the ILM inverted group were healed (100%, 27/27); no retinal detachment occurred. Among the 51 eyes in the ILM peeling group, the hole healed in 45 eyes (88.2%, 45/51), and the retina was detached in 6 eyes (11.8%, 6/51). There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of retinal detachment between the two groups of patients (χ2=45.440, P=0.000).ConclusionCompared to ILM peeling, inverted ILM has provided better RPE protection and reduce the rate of retinal redetachment in patients with MHRD.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of internal limiting membrane (ILM) flip coverage with ILM multilayer tamponade in the treatment of highly myopic macular hole-associated retinal detachment (MHRD). MethodsA retrospective clinical study. From November 2019 to June 2022, 53 cases and 53 eyes of MHRD patients who were examined and diagnosed at the Eye Centre of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University were included in the study. Among them, 21 cases and 21 eyes were male and 32 cases and 32 eyes were female. The age was (55.28±11.40) years. The patients were categorized into two groups: the ILM coverage group (from November 2019 to September 2020) and the ILM multilayer tamponade group (from October 2020 to June 2022) based on their surgical procedures. The ILM coverage group comprised of 11 cases involving 11 eyes, while the ILM multilayer tamponade group comprised of 42 cases involving 42 eyes. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography were conducted. BCVA was measured using standardized international visual acuity charts and transformed to logarithmic minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity for statistical analysis. The affected eyes were all treated with standard transciliary flattening three-channel 23-gauge vitrectomy. The inverted ILM flap technique was combined with flap coverage in the inverted group, while the ILM multilayer tamponade group used circular ILM stripping to preserve the ILM in the macular area and ILM flap around the macular hole with multilayer ILM tamponade. Postoperative follow-up was carried out for a minimum of 6 months. Relevant examinations were conducted during the follow-up using the same equipment and methods as those used before surgery. The BCVA, as well as the closure of macular hole, resurfacing of the retina, and development of macular hyperplasia, were observed. ResultsIn the ILM-covered group, the macular hole was closed in 7 out of 11 eyes after 1 week of surgery. At 1 month after surgery, the macular hole was closed in all treated eyes. At 6 months after surgery, the macular hole was closed in 9 eyes, while 2 eyes were reopened. In 42 eyes from the ILM-multilayer tamponade group, the macular hole closed after surgery in 41 eyes. At 6 months postoperatively, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of eyes in ILM-covered and ILM-multilayer tamponade groups was 0.91±0.29 and 1.05±0.39, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (t=1.140, P=0.260). The BCVA of the eyes in both groups showed a significant improvement compared to the preoperative period with a statistically significant difference (t=8.490, 13.840; P＜0.000 1); 6 months after surgery, 10 out of 11 eyes in the ILM coverage group had a restored retina with no detectable macular hyperplasia; 42 eyes in the ILM multilayer tamponade group had a restored retina, but 19 of these eyes had detectable macular hyperplasia. ConclusionsEither ILM flap coverage or ILM multilayer tamponade contributes to high myopic MHRD closure and improved visual acuity. Compared to ILM flap coverage, ILM multilayer tamponade results in higher and earlier rates of macular hole closure and lower rates of macular hole reopening. However, ILM multilayer tamponade may lead to a higher proportion of macular hyperplasia formation without affecting visual acuity recovery at 6 months after surgery.