west china medical publishers
Author
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Author "JIANGLei" 3 results
  • COX-2-765 G > C (rs20417) Gene Polymorphism and the Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-analysis

    ObjectiveTo systematically review the association between -765 G > C (rs20417) polymorphism of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) gene and the risk of gastric cancer (GC). MethodsSuch databases as PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2015), CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were searched from inception to October 2015 to collect case-control studies about the correlation between -765 G > C (rs20417) polymorphism of COX-2 gene and GC. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the quality of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 12.0 software. ResultsA total of 15 case-control studies were included in this meta-analysis, including 2 891 cases and 4 967 controls. Meta-analysis showed that the -765 G > C (rs20417) polymorphism was significantly associated with the risk of GC (OR=1.70, 95%CI 1.21 to 2.38, P=0.002). Subgroup analysis showed there was a significant association between the -765 G > C (rs20417) polymorphism and GC in Asians (OR=2.24, 95%CI 1.70 to 2.96, P=0.000); However, no association was found in the Caucasians and Americans. In the subgroup analysis by Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) status, there were statistical significances between helicobacter pylori (+) and helicobacter pylori (-) with the risk of GC in COX-2 polymorphism of CC/CG vs. GG (OR=2.11, 95%CI 1.41 to 3.14, P < 0.001). ConclusionThe COX-2-765 G > C (rs20417) polymorphism may be significantly associated with an increased risk of GC, especially among Asians.

    Release date:2016-11-22 01:14 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Safety and Effectiveness of Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy with D2 Lymph Node Dissection for Distal Gastric Cancer of Chinese Patients: A Systematic Review

    ObjectiveTo systemically evaluate safety and effectiveness of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and conventional open distal gastrostomy(CODG) with D2 lymph node dissection for Chinese patients with distal gastric cancer. MethodsLiterature were searched in PubMed database, the Cochrane Library, China science citation database (CSCD), Wanfang database, China science and technology journal database (CSTJ), China biomedical literature database (CBM), and China academic journal network publishing database (CAJD) to identify clinical random controlled trials, comparing safety and effectiveness of LADG and CODG with D2 lymph node dissection for Chinese patients with distal gastric cancer. The retrieval time was from the inception to Jun. 2013. Meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 7 clinical random controlled trials including 548 patients were analyzed. Compared with CODG group, LADG group had less blood loss (MD=-94.02, 95% CI:-140.96--47.07), shorter postoperative hospital stay(MD=-3.66, 95% CI:-5.76--1.57), earlier postoperative ambulation time(MD=-1.95, 95% CI:-2.74--1.17), earlier postoperative exhaust time (MD=-1.67, 95% CI:-2.05--1.30), lower incidence of complications(OR=0.26, 95% CI:0.14-0.51), P<0.050. But the operation time was longer in LADG group (MD=35.01, 95% CI:10.41-59.61, P=0.005). There was no significant difference between LADG group and CODG group on number of lymph node which were dissected during the operation (MD=-0.24, 95% CI:-0.99-0.51, P=0.530). ConclusionThe short-term outcome and safety of LADG for Chinese patients with distal gastric cancer is superior to CODG, but LADG prolongs the operation time and its long-term outcome should be proved by further outcomes of clinical controlled trials.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Value of Mass Screening of Serum Pepsinogen Test for Asian Population with High-risk Gastric Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis

    ObjectiveTo systematically review the value of mass screening of serum pepsinogen test for Asian population with high-risk gastric carcinoma. MethodsWe electronically searched databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 12, 2013), CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and CBM for diagnostic tests on serum pepsinogen test versus with pathological biopsy/X-ray examination (gold standard) between January 2004 and January 2014. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality of included studies. Then meta-analysis was conducted using Meta-DiSc software (version 1.4). ResultsA total of 15 studies involving 180 934 subjects were included. ROC curve showed "shoulder-arm shape" distribution. The results of Spearman correlation analysis suggested a significance of the threshold effect (P=0.001). The results of meta-analysis showed that, the area under curve (AUC) was 0.74. ConclusionSerum pepsinogen has good value in the screening of gastric carcinoma among Asian permanent residents. Due to limited quality of studies, the above conclusion should be verified by conducting more high quality studies.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content