ObjectiveTo evaluate clinical outcomes of mitral valve replacement (MVR) combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared with CABG alone for patients with coronary artery disease and moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR). MethodsA systematic literature search for studies which were published from January 1990 to August 2013 from PubMed, Cochrane Library, China Academic Journals Full-text Database, Wanfang Data, and VIP Journal Database and compared CABG+MVR and CABG alone for IMR patients was performed. Quality of randomized controlled trials was assessed by Jada scale. Quality of case control studies was assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). RevMan 5.0 was used for meta-analysis. ResultsSix clinical trials including 2 randomized controlled trials and 4 case control studies were included in this study. Jadad scale for both 2 randomized controlled trials was 5 points and NOS for all the 4 case controlled studies was 8 points. Meta-analysis showed that there was no statistical difference in early postoperative mortality between the 2 groups[randomized controlled trials:RR=1.69, 95% CI (0.28, 10.10), P=0.57;case controlled studies:OR=0.48, 95% CI (0.21, 1.13), P=0.09]. There was no statistical difference in 1-year survival rate between the 2 groups[randomized controlled trials:RR=1.00, 95% CI (0.93, 1.08), P=0.92;case controlled studies:OR=1.72, 95% CI (0.60, 4.95), P=0.32]. There was no statistical difference in 5-year survival rate between the 2 groups[OR=1.12, 95% CI (0.68, 1.83), P=0.66]. LVEF of CABG+MVR patients was significantly higher than that of CABG alone patients[MD=1.38, 95% CI (0.17, 2.59), P=0.03]. Postoperative New York Heart Association (NYHA) class of CABG+MVR patients was significantly better than that of CABG alone patients[MD=-0.85, 95% CI (-1.14, -0.56), P < 0.01]. ConclusionCompared with CABG alone, MVR combined with CABG cannot significantly increase postoperative survival rate of the patients, but can improve postoperative heart function recovery and quality of life.
ObjectiveTo discuss the influence of early postoperative hemodynamic, postoperative mortality and the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events with the phenomenon of prosthesis-patient mismatch. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 89 patients who had simple aortic valve replacement in our hospital bewteen January 2012 and January 2014. The 89 patients were divided into two groups including a match group (16 females and 48 males with average age of 58.1±10.4 years) and a mismatch group (15 females and 10 males with average age of 65.3±12.8 years). We compared early results between the two groups. ResultsThere is a statistic difference (P < 0.05) in aortic flow velocity, mean pressure gradient, and the maximum pressure gradient between the two groups. The survival rate of the match group is significantly lower than that of the mismatch group (P < 0.05). And there is a statistical difference in adverse cardiovascular event-free incidence between the two groups (P < 0.001). ConclusionThe phenomenon of prosthesis-patient mismatch can affect postoperative hemodynamic and lead to heart failure after surgery. And early mortality and the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events in patients are increased due to prosthesis-patient mismatch.
ObjectiveTo find the relationship between bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and the dilatation or aneurysm of the aorta using electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography angiography (CTA). MethodsWe collected the clinical data of the BAV coexisting with suspected aortic dilatation or aneurysm from February 2012 through April 2015. A total of 124 patients were analyzed retrospectively. There were 97 males and 27 females at an anverage age of 50.35±16.26 years. According to the CTA, patients were classified into two groups: a pure BAV(without raphe) group and a BAV (with raphe) group. we recorded the aortic diameters, gender, age, and so on. ResultsOf the 124 patients, 91 (73.4%) had BAV with raphe, and 33 patients (26.6%) had pure BAV. The analysis revealed that the diameter of the annulus (23.90±3.34 mm vs. 21.74±3.46 mm, P=0.005), the sinuses of Valsalva (40.93±6.78 mm vs. 37.35±7.06 mm, P=0.022), the tubular portion of the ascending aorta (45.38±7.66 mm vs. 38.29±8.18 mm, P=0.0001), and the part of the aorta proximal to the innominate artery (34.19±4.98 mm vs. 30.23±6.62 mm, P=0.02) between patients with BAV with raphe and pure BAV had significant differences. And there was a significant difference in prevalence of dilatation of the aorta between patients with pure BAV and BAV with raphe [77/91 (84.6%) vs.18/31(58.1%), P=0.004]. Of the 91 BAV with raphe patients, we found 76 patients (83.5%) with right and left coronary cusps (R-L) fusion, 13 patients (14.3%) with right and non-coronary cusps (R-N) fusion, and 2 patients (1.2%) with left and non-coronary cusps (L-N) fusion. There was a statistical difference in the aortic root diameters between R-L fusion BAV and R-N fusion BAV. The diameter of the distal ascending aorta and proximal aortic arch between R-L and R-N fusion BAV had statistical differences. ConclusionsBAV with raphe is more common than pure BAV and is more often associated with dilatation and aneurysm of the ascending aorta. Otherwise R-L fusion BAV is associated with increased diameters of the aortic root, while R-N fusion BAV is associated with increased diameters of the distal ascending aorta and proximal arch.