Objective To investigate the method and the short term cl inical effectiveness of in situ suture repair procedure of knee dislocation with multi ple-l igament injury at acute stage. Methods From February 2006 to November 2007, 9 patients suffering from single knee closed dislocation with multi ple-ligament injury underwent open in situ suture repairprocedure with non-absorbable thread and managements of other combined injuries simultaneously. Nine patients included 6 males and 3 females, aged 34-52 years old. The injured knees were left side in 4 cases and right side in 5 cases. Injuries were caused by traffic accident in 8 cases and heavy-weight crushing in 1 case. EMRI and arthroscopic examination showed that all patients suffered from the avulsion injuries of anterior cruciate l igament and posterior cruciate l igament. The time from injury to operation was 4 to 7 days with an average of 5.1 days. Results No bacterial arthritis occurred after operation. Subcutaneous liquated fat occurred and cured after symptomatic treatment in 2 cases, other incisions healed by first intension. All patients were followed up 12 months. At 12 months postoperatively, 2 patients’ flexion range of the suffering knees lost 10° when to compared with normal knees, and the range of motion was from 0 to 125°. The Lysholm knee scores were 83-92 (average 86.3), the results were excellent in 3 cases and good in 6 cases. The posterior drawer test and anterior drawer test were one-degree positive in 3 cases respectively; the Lachman tests were one-degree positive in 5 cases, lateral stress tests were negative in all cases. Conclusion In situ suture repair procedure of knee dislocation with multi ple-ligament injury at acute stage has the advantages such as rel iable fixation, simultaneous management of other combined injuries and satisfactory short term effect.
Objective To evaluate the surgical procedure and short-term effectiveness of one-stage repair and reconstruction of knee dislocation with multiple ligament injuries (KDMLI). Methods Between September 2010 and April 2014, 9 cases (9 knees) of KDMLI were treated. There were 7 males and 2 females with an average age of 42 years (range, 27-57 years). Injury was caused by traffic accident in 3 cases, heavy-weight crushing in 3 cases, sports sprain in 2 cases, and falling from height in 1 case. The average time from injury to operation was 11 days (range, 3-19 days). The results of posterior drawer test and Lachman test were positive in all patients. The results of varus stress testing were three-degree positive in 4 cases, and the results of valgus stress testing were three-degree positive in 6 cases. The Lysholm score of knee was 27.2±6.3; the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score was 29.7±6.5; and the range of motion (ROM) was (52.6±12.8)°. All patients suffered from posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury and femoral avulsion injury of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Combined injuries included medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury in 4 cases (medial meniscus injury in 1 case), lateral collateral ligament (LCL) injury in 2 cases, and MCL and LCL injuries in 2 cases (medial meniscus and lateral meniscus injuries in 1 case). Autologous harmstring tendon was used to reconstruct PCL under arthroscopy combined with limited open in situ suture for repair of femoral avulsion injury of ACL, and repair of MCL, LCL, and other injury in one-stage operation. Results All incisions healed by first intention. Joint effusion of knee occurred in 1 case and was cured after removal of fluid combined with pressure bandage. All patients were followed up 12-36 months with an average of 22 months. At last follow-up, the result of posterior drawer test was negative in all patients. The results of Lachman test were one-degree positive in 2 cases; the result of varus stress testing was one-degree positive in 1 case; the results of valgus stress testing were one-degree positive in 2 cases; and flexion dysfunction of the knee was observed in 1 case. The Lysholm score of knee was 87.3±6.6; the IKDC score was 88.9±6.8; and the ROM was (121.7±12.3)°, all showing significant differences when compared with preoperative ones (t=44.246, P=0.000; t=37.903, P=0.000; t=19.894, P=0.000). Conclusion For KDMLI, one-stage repair and reconstruction using autologous harmstring tendon to reconst ruct PCL under arthroscopy combined with limited open in situ suture repair of femoral avulsion injury of ACL, and repair MCL, LCL, and other injury has such advantages as minimal invasiveness, reliable fixation, less complications, and fast recovery, which can significantly improve the stability, ROM, and function of knee and obtain good short-term effectiveness.
Objective To review the research progress of diagnosis and treatment system for knee dislocation (KD) based on the stage and classification of posteromedial structure and posterolateral corner injury, so as to provide guidance for clinical work. Methods The relevant literature on the classification, diagnosis and treatment was extensively reviewed. Results At present, the criterion of the stage and classification of KD mainly include classification based on the size of the injury energy, Kennedy classification, and the improved Schenck classification, but they are not perfect because of no stage and classification of multiple ligament injury and no standardized treatment of different injuries. Hua Xi Knee Dislocation and Multiple Ligament Injury (HX-KDMLI) has optimum plan for injury treatment of posteromedial structure and posterolateral corner injury in KD based on stage and classification. Conclusion At present, there is no unified opinion on stages and classifications of the posteromedial structure and posterolateral corner injury in KD as well as on diagnosis and treatment. HX-KDMLI has certain feasibility for the stage and classification of the posteromedial structure and posterolateral corner injury in KD, to a certain extent, it can be used as reference for the diagnosis and treatment of KD.
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of one-stage posterior medial corner (PMC) repair or reconstruction combined with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction in treating KD-ⅢM dislocation. Methods The clinical data of 15 patients with knee KD-ⅢM dislocation who met the selection criteria between January 2016 and July 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 9 males and 6 females, aged 22-61 years (mean, 40.3 years). Injuries were caused by violence of flexion, valgus, and external rotation, including 10 cases of traffic accident injuries, 3 cases of crush injuries, 1 case of winch injury, and 1 case of explosion injury. The time from injury to operation ranged from 3 days to 6 months, with an average of 18.5 days. PMC repair combined with PCL+ACL reconstruction was performed in 10 cases in acute stage (within 3 weeks after injury), including 3 cases of irreducible dislocation. PMC+PCL+ACL reconstruction was performed in 5 cases with chronic dislocation. Before operation and at last follow-up, the knee joint function was evaluated by Lysholm score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000 score. KT-3000 was used to evaluate the forward stability of the knee (calculated the difference of tibial anterior displacement of both knees), the X-ray films of the stress position of the knee joint was used to evaluate the valgus of the knee (calculated the difference of medial joint space width of both knees) and the backward stability (calculated the difference of tibial posterior displacement of both knees), and the internal and external rotation stability was evaluated by knee flexion 30° tibial external rotation and knee flexion 90° tibial internal rotation tests (calculated the difference of tibial internal rotation and the difference of tibial external rotation of both knees). Results The operation time was 120-240 minutes, with an average of 186.5 minutes. Patients were followed up 24-48 months, with an average of 27.4 months. There was no complication such as infection, deep vein thrombosis, vascular injury, or heterotopic ossification. At last follow-up, the Lysholm score, IKDC2000 score, the difference of tibial anterior displacement of both knees, the difference of medial joint space width of both knees, the difference of tibial posterior displacement of both knees, the difference of tibial internal rotation and the difference of tibial external rotation of both knees significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05). According to the IKDC2000 valgus stability grading standard, there were 3 cases of grade C and 12 cases of grade D before operation, and 10 cases of grade A and 5 cases of grade B at last follow-up, which was significantly improved when compared with that before operation (Z=−4.930, P=0.000). At last follow-up, the pivot shift tests of 15 patients were negative. The anterior and posterior drawer tests of 10 patients were negative, 5 patients had mild instability, both the anterior and posterior drawer tests were positive. ConclusionKD-ⅢM dislocation of the knee joint can lead to the posterior medial and anterior instability. Acute dislocation combined with “dimple sign” requires surgical reduction as soon as possible to repair PMC and reconstruct PCL and ACL. In chronic patients, PMC is difficult to repair, it is recommended to reconstruct PMC, PCL, and ACL at one stage to improve knee joint stability. The early and middle effectiveness are satisfactory.
Objective To investigate the short-term effectiveness of one-stage anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), and posterolateral complex (PLC) reconstruction combined with medial collateral ligament repair for KD-Ⅳ knee dislocation. Methods Between January 2018 and June 2020, 9 patients with KD-Ⅳ knee dislocation were treated. Of 9 cases, 7 were male and 2 were female with an average age of 32.3 years (range, 23-43 years). The knee dislocation was caused by falling from height in 6 cases and traffic accident in 3 cases. The injury located at left knee in 2 cases and right knee in 7 cases. The time from injury to operation was 14-24 days, with an average of 19 days. The preoperative International Knee Joint Documentation Committee (IKDC) score was 45.6±4.2, Lysholm score was 42.4±7.0, and the knee joint active flexion range of motion was (75.2±12.3)°. The posterior drawer test, pivot-shift test, Dial test, and 0° valgus stress test were all positive. Under arthroscopy, PCL was reconstructed with the autologous tendons, ACL with allogeneic Achilles tendon, PLC with the allogeneic anterior tibial tendon by Larson enhanced reconstruction method, and MCL was repaired with anchor or simple suture. Results The operation time was 2-3 hours (mean, 2.5 hours). All incisions healed by first intention after operation. All patients were followed up12-25 months (mean, 16.1 months). After operation, 2 cases developed knee flexion disorder and pain, and 1 case had knee joint stiffness. At last follow-up, the IKDC score was 76.9±7.4, the Lysholm score was 81.6±6.4, and the knee active flexion range of motion was (122.9±7.2)°, all of which significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05). During follow-up, there was no failure of the grafts. At last follow-up, there were significant differences in the posterior drawer test, pivot-shift test, Dial test, and 0° valgus stress test between pre- and post-operation (P<0.05). The imaging review showed that the positions of the bone tunnels were satisfactory, the reconstructed ACL, PCL, and PLC structures were continuous, and MCL insertions were restored. Conclusion One-stage ACL, PCL, and PLC reconstruction combined with MCL repair to treat KD-Ⅳ knee dislocation can effectively restore knee joint stability, improve joint laxity, and improve joint movement.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of personalized treatment based on Hua Xi-knee dislocation and multiple ligament injury (HX-KDMLI) diagnosis and treatment system. Methods A clinical data of 36 patients (36 knees) with KDMLI met the selective criteria between February 2019 and September 2020 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 24 males and 12 females with an average age of 45.7 years (range, 21-62 years). The KDMLI was caused by traffic accident in 15 cases, heavy pound in 8 cases, sports sprain in 7 cases, falling from height in 4 cases, and machine cutting in 2 cases. The interval between injury and operation was 1-9 weeks (mean, 3.6 weeks). All patients were categorized according to HX-KDMLI diagnosis and treatment system. Twenty patients were categorized as acute period and 16 patients as chronic period. Three patients were type HX-Ⅰ-A, 1 type HX-Ⅰ-P, 10 type HX-Ⅲ-L, 13 type HX-Ⅲ-M, 4 type HX-Ⅳ-S, 3 type HX-Ⅴ-F, and 2 type HX-Ⅴ-T. Thirty-five patients were positive in both the anterior drawer test and Lachman test, 31 were positive in the posterior drawer test; 19 patients were positive in varus stress test, 23 were positive in valgus stress test. According to the Internation Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) grading, there was 1 case of grade A, 5 cases of grade B, 8 cases of grade C, and 2 cases of grade D. Surgical interventions included arthroscopic surgery, open surgery, or arthroscopy combined with open surgery, ligament suture or reconstruction, and internal fixation after anatomical reduction of the fracture. Different rehabilitation protocols were assigned to patients during different postoperative period, according to patient’s individualized classification. ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention with no obvious complications. All patients were followed up 12-19 months (mean, 15 months). At 12 months after operation, all patients retained muscle strength of grade Ⅴ, and range of motion of the knee joint could reach 0° extension and over 120° flexion. Radiographic examination showed no sign of knee instability, healed fractures, ideal joint alignment, good continuity and tension, and clear image of repaired or reconstructed ligaments. The anterior and posterior drawer tests were all negative. Lachman test was degreeⅠpositive in 5 cases, valgus stress test was degreeⅠpositive in 2 cases, varus stress test was degreeⅠpositive in 2 cases; the other patients were all negative. At 12 months after operation, according to the IKDC grading, there were 9 cases of grade A, 19 cases of grade B, 5 cases of grade C, and 3 cases of grade D, showing significant differences when compared with the preoperative ones (Z=–5.328, P=0.000). There were significant differences in the IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner scores between pre- and post-operation (P<0.05). ConclusionThe promising effectiveness of KDMLI can obtain under the guidance of HX-KDMLI.