ObjectiveTo understand the current situation of surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. MethodThe literature relevant to surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma at home and abroad in recent years was reviewed. ResultsThe various surgical treatment schemes of hilar cholangiocarcinoma had advantages and disadvantages. At present, there were still disputes and no unified consensus on preoperative preparation, selection of intraoperative surgical resection range, and applications of laparoscopy and robot, etc. The individualized surgical treatment plan should still be formulated based on the specific condition of the patient and the professional experience of the surgeon. The individualized surgical treatment plan should still be formulated based on the specific condition of the patient and the professional experience of the surgeon. ConclusionIt is believed that accurate preoperative condition evaluation should be carried out for each patient with hilar cholangiocarcinoma, so as to formulate the best surgical treatment plan, achieve individualized accurate treatment and benefit patients.
ObjectiveTo explore the correlation of preoperative D-dimer (DD) level with prognosis in Chinese esophageal cancer patients.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, SinoMed databases were searched to identify potential studies which assessed prognostic value of preoperative DD level in Chinese esophageal cancer patients from the establishment date of each database to March 20, 2019. The Stata 12.0 software was applied to conduct the meta-analysis and the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was combined to evaluate the relation between preoperative DD level and survival of Chinese esophageal cancer patients.ResultsA total of 5 studies involving 1 277 patients were included. The quality score of each study was ≥6 points. The results showed that the elevated preoperative DD level was significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS, HR=1.49, 95%CI 1.05-2.10, P=0.025) and cancer-specific survival (CSS, HR=1.83, 95%CI 1.39-2.42, P<0.001). However, no significant relation of preoperative DD with disease-free survival (DFS) was observed (HR=1.55, 95%CI 0.89-2.70, P=0.125).ConclusionHigh preoperative DD level may be an independent prognostic factor for Chinese patients with esophageal cancer. More prospective studies with bigger sample sizes are still needed to verify our results.
ObjectiveTo explore the relationship between metformin use and the risk and prognosis of esophageal cancer in patients with diabetes.MethodsThe PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase, VIP, WanFang and CNKI databases were searched by computer to identify relevant studies from inception to August 21, 2021. Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to evaluate research quality. The STATA 12.0 software was used to conduct the statistical analysis.ResultsA total of 14 studies involving 5 605 218 participants were included finally. NOS of all researches were≥6 points. The pooled results indicated that metformin use could decrease the risk of esophageal cancer in diabetics (OR=0.84, 95%CI 0.71-1.00, P=0.045), and could also prolong the overall survival of diabetics with esophageal cancer (HR=0.89, 95%CI 0.80-0.99, P=0.025).ConclusionMetformin use can not only decrease the risk of esophageal cancer in patients with diabetes, but also improve the prognosis of diabetics with esophageal cancer significantly. However, more prospective high-quality studies are still needed to verify the conclusion.
Two male patients (75 years and 51 years, respectively) suffered infection of novel coronavirus after minimally invasive surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Sichuan Cancer Hospital since December 2022. Both patients developed severe hypoxemia after surgery, and were treated with advanced oxygen therapy, antiviral therapy, hormone shock therapy, antibiotic anti-infection and nutritional support. The two patients stayed in the intensive care unit for 6 days and 8 days respectively. They were transferred to the general ward for symptomatic treatment and were discharged successfully. Both patients required low-flow oxygen maintenance after discharge. On the 20th day of follow-up after discharge, patient 1 still needed low-flow oxygen, his oxygen saturation could be maintained above 97%, but intermittent deoxygenation could be performed for half an hour. Patient 2 was in good condition on 35 days after discharge.