ObjectiveTo compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes between laminoplasty and laminectomy compression and fusion with internal fixation to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy. MethodsBetween September 2006 and September 2009, 143 cases of multilevel cervical myelopathy (the affected segments were more than 3) were treated by laminoplasty in 87 cases (group A) and by laminectomy decompression and fusion with lateral mass screw fixation in 56 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, pathological type, and affected segments between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, improvement of neurological function [Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) 17 score], and the incidences of complications were observed; the cervical curvature index (CCI), range of motion (ROM), and symptoms of neck and shoulder pain [visual analogue scale (VAS) and neck disability index (NDI) scores] were recorded and compared. ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). All patients were followed up 18-30 months (mean, 24 months). C5 nerve root palsy occurred in 4 cases (4.60%) of group A and in 5 cases (8.93%) of group B, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.475, P=0.482). No complication of deep infection, pseudarthrosis, or screw loosening occurred. No closure of opened laminae was observed in group A; and no screw extrusion, breakage, or nerve injury was observed in group B. At last follow-up, neck axial symptoms appeared in 35 cases (40.23%) of group A and in 11 cases (19.64%) of group B, showing significant difference (χ2=6.612, P=0.009). No significant difference was found in JOA score, CCI, ROM, or VAS scores between 2 groups at preoperation (P gt; 0.05); the JOA score, ROM, and VAS scores of groups A and B and CCI of group A at last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (P lt; 0.05). No significant difference was found in the JOA score, improvement rate, and VAS score between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05); however, significant differences were found in ROM and CCI between 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). There were significant differences (P lt; 0.05) in pain intensity, lifting, work, reaction, driving, and total score between 2 groups at last follow-up. ConclusionLaminectomy decompression and fusion with internal fixation can effectively relieve pain, but it will greatly reduce the ROM; laminoplasty has less complications and satisfactory outcome. The two methods have similar effectiveness in the improvement of neurological function.
Objective To determine the surgical indications for posterior expansive open-door laminoplasty (EOLP) extended to the C1 level. Methods Seventeen patients undergoing C3-7 or C2-7 open-door laminoplasty were included as the case group between September 2005 and January 2010, whose spinal cord injury symptoms were not alleviated or aggravated again because of the cervical stenosis at C1-4 level, and the causes of the surgery itself were eliminated, all of these patients underwent reoperation with decompress upward to C1 level. Fifteen patients with cervical stenosis who underwent C2-7 laminoplasty and C1 laminectomy were selected as the control group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, and disease duration between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The pre- and post-operative cervical curvature and spinal cord compression were evaluated according to the patients’ imaging data; the pre- and post-operative neurological recovery situation was evaluated by Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) 17 score and spinal cord function Frankel grade; the neurological recovery rate (according to Hirabayashi et al. method) was used to assess the postoperative neurological recovery situation. Results In the case group, 8 patients underwent primary C3-7 laminoplasty. In 3 of these patients, there was a cervical stenosis at C1, 2 level, and discontinuous cerebrospinal fluid around the spinal cord was observed; 5 of them with a compression mass which diameter was exceed 7.0 mm in the C2-4 segments. The remaining 9 patients in the case group underwent primary C2-7 laminoplasty, and the diameter of the compression mass was exceed 7.0 mm in the C2-4 segments. In all 17 patients of the case group, reoperation was performed with the decompression range extended to the C1 level, and the follow-up time was 35-61 months with an average of 45.6 months. Cervical curvature: there were 11 cases of cervical lordosis, 4 cases of straight spine, and 2 cases of cervical kyphosis before operation; but after operation, 2 cases of cervical lordosis became straight spine and 1 straight case became kyphosis. The postoperative neurological improvement was excellent in 8 cases, good in 7, and fair in 2. In the control group, all the patients had a compression mass which anteroposterior diameter was exceed 7.0 mm in the C2-4 segments before operation. The follow-up time was 30-58 months with an average of 38.7 months. Cervical curvature: there were 13 cases of cervical lordosis and 2 cases of straight spine before operation; but after operation, 1 case of cervical lordosis became straight spine. The postoperative neurological improvement was excellent in 8 cases, good in 6, and fair in 1. No significant difference was found in the JOA score at pre- and post-operation between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05); however, there were significant differences (P lt; 0.05) in the JOA score between at last follow-up and at preoperation. Conclusion The initially surgical indications which can be used as a reference for EOLP extended to C1 are as follows:① Upper cervical (C1, 2) spinal stenosis: C1 posterior arch above the lower edge part of cerebrospinal fluid around the spinal cord signal is not continuous, and the anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal actual is less than 8.0 mm as judgment standard. ②There is a huge compression at the lower edge of C2-4 vertebrae, and the most prominent part of the diameter is exceed 7.0 mm, which can not be removed through the anterior cervical surgery, or the operation is high-risk.