Objective To discuss the improved method and effectiveness of posterior pedicle-screw fixation combined with restoring and grafting through the injured vertebrae for treating thoracolumbar burst fracture. Methods Between March 2008 and September 2010, 21 patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture were treated by posterior pedicle-screw fixationcombined with restoring and grafting through the injured vertebrae. Of 21 cases, 15 were male and 6 were female with an age range of 20-61 years (mean, 38.4 years). Affected segments included T12 in 5 cases, L1 in 7 cases, L2 in 5 cases, and T12-L1 in 4 cases. According to Frankel classification for neurological function, 2 cases were rated as grade A, 4 cases as grade B, 6 cases as grade C, 5 cases as grade D, and 4 cases as grade E; based on Denis classification, all 21 cases were burst fractures, including 7 cases of type A, 11 cases of type B, and 3 cases of type C. The X-ray film was taken to measure the relative height of fractured vertebrae and Cobb’s angle, and the function of the spinal cord was evaluated at preoperation, postoperation, and last followup. Results All the incisions healed primarily. The 21 patients were followed up 12-30 months (mean, 26 months). No loosening or breakage of screws and rods occurred. X-ray films showed good bone heal ing with the heal ing time from 12 to 23 months (mean, 16 months). The Cobb’s angles at 1 week and 1 year postoperatively were (3.4 ± 2.4)° and (5.2 ± 3.2)° respectively, showing significant differences when compared with preoperative angle (22.1 ± 1.2)° (P lt; 0.05), while no significant difference between 1 week and 1 year after operation (P gt; 0.05). The anterior height of injured vertebrae recovered from (14.6 ± 2.1) mm (40.2% ± 1.5% of the normal) at preoperation to (36.0 ± 2.0) mm (95.3% ± 1.3% of the normal) at 1 week, and to (35.0 ± 2.4) mm (94.4% ± 2.5% of the normal) at 1 year; significant differences were found between preoperation and postoperation (P lt; 0.05), while no significant difference between 1 week and 1 year after operation (P gt; 0.05). At 1 year after operation, the Frankel neurological function grade was improved in varying degrees, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative grade (χ2=11.140, P=0.025). Conclusion Improved method of posterior pedicle-screw fixation combined with restoring and grafting through the injured vertebrae in treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture can reconstructthe anterior and middle column stabil ity and prevent loss of Cobb’s angle and height of vertebrae.
Objective To assess the efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy versus moderate-dose chemotherapy in the treatment of osteosarcoma. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMbase, OVID database, CBMdisc, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library, and handsearched Journal of Chinese Oncology, Journal of Chinese Clinical Oncology and Tumor. The search time was updated to Feburary 2006.The quality of the included studies was evaluated by two reviewers and meta-analyses were performed on the results of homogenous studies. Results Four studies involving 937 participants with primary, high-grade and non-metastatic extremity osteosarcoma were included. All the included studies were judged to be inadequate at reporting randomization and blinding, only one reported allocation concealment. All included studies reported the number of withdrawals and the reasons for these. The meta-analyses showed that there were no significant differences in 5-year event free survival (EFS) (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.96 to1.25), 5-year overall survival (OS) (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.97 to1.20), local recurrence rate (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.57), proportion of good histological response (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.07), proportion of limb salvage [RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.02) between the high-dose group and the moderate-dose group. The 5-year EFS of the good histological response group was significantly higher than in the poor histological response group [OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.76 to 3.39,Plt;0.00001 ). Conclusions No advantage is shown for high-dose chemotherapy over moderate-dose chemotherapy in 5-year EFS, 5-year OS, local recurrence rate, proportion of good histological response and proportion of limb salvage. Histological response to preoperative chemotherapy is an independent prognosis factor for osteosarcoma. Due to the potential risk of selection bias, performance bias and publication bias, the evidence is not b enough to judge whether high-dose chemotherapy is better than moderate-dose chemotherapy in the treatment of osteosarcoma. Our conclusion suggests that large-scale randomized trials should be performed.
Objictive To evaluate the efficacy of decompression with and without fusion in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. Methods We searched the Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to April, 2006), EMBASE (1984 to April, 2006), the China Biological Medicine Database (to Dec., 2005), VIP (1989 to April, 2006) and hand-searched several related journals for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized controlled trials (quasi-RCTs) involving the comparison of the outcomes between decompression with and without fusion in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. The quality of the included trials was assessed. RevMan 4.2.8 software was used for statistical analysis. Results Seven studies involving 412 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis indicated that no statistically significant differences were observed between the two operative procedures in the cumulative clinical outcome (OR1.83, 95%CI 0.92, 3.41), incidence of postoperative leg pain (OR 1.04, 95%CI 0.48, 2.25), incidence of perioperative complications (OR 1.15, 95%CI 0.51, 2.60), incidence of re-operation (OR 0.68, 95%CI 0.30, 1.56) or pre and postoperative pain scores [Pre-op WMD 0.12, 95%CI (-0.44,0.68); Post-op WMD 0.08, 95%CI (-1.08,1.25)]. The only statistical significance was observed in the incidence of postoperative back pain (OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.14, 0.46). Four studies described the length of operation, the intraoperative blood loss, the duration of external fixation postoperative and the total cost in hospital, which revealed that decompression alone was superior to decompression plus fusion. Three studies described the relationships between the clinical outcome and the changes in segmental range of motion/disc height pre- and post-operatively, as well as the flexion-extension radiographs, which revealed that decompression plus fusion was superior to decompression alone. Conclusions There are no significant differences between the two procedures in clinical outcomes, incidences of postoperative leg pain, re-operation and complications. Decompression with fusion leads to fewer patients suffering from postoperative lumbago than that of decompression alone. There is insufficient evidence to demonstrate that the radiographs may predict the clinical outcomes. More high quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials are required.
【摘要】目的探讨经腹腔入路一期病灶清除、自体髂骨移植、后路椎弓根固定治疗腰骶椎结核的效果。方法对2004年8月2007年6月收治12例L4～S1椎体结核,采用经腹腔入路显露腰骶椎,彻底清除病灶后用自体髂骨块椎间植骨,后路椎弓根螺钉固定;术后常规支持和抗结核治疗,术后1、3、6、9、12个月,以后每6个月一次定期随访,观察血沉变化,摄X线片、CT三维重建评估结核活动、骨块融合和畸形矫正情况。结果术中无大血管、神经、输尿管损伤,随访11～23个月,平均17个月,结核病变局部无复发,无结核性腹膜炎、性功能障碍等并发症发生。结论经腹腔前方入路暴露腰骶椎结核病灶充分、安全,病灶清除后行自体髂骨块椎间植骨、腰骶椎后路椎弓根螺钉固定可有效重建腰骶椎的稳定性。