ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the therapeutic effects of different surgical procedures for ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR). MethodsComputer searches were conducted in CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, and Web of Science, with the search time limit from the inception of the databases to February 2024. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, used the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool to evaluate the quality of the included studies, and used Stata 17.0 software to analyze the data. ResultsA total of 19 randomized controlled trials involving 6139 patients were finally included, involving six surgical procedures, and the overall quality of the included studies was relatively high. The results of the network Meta-analysis showed that the 30-day all-cause mortality rate of mitral valve repair (MVr) was significantly lower than that of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) [OR=0.24, 95%CI (0.07, 0.87)], mitral valve replacement (MVR) [OR=0.43, 95%CI (0.23, 0.79)], CABG+MVR [OR=0.21, 95%CI (0.04, 0.95)] and transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair (TEER) using MitraClip [OR=0.13, 95%CI (0.02, 0.87)]. The 30-day all-cause mortality rate of CABG+MVr was significantly lower than that of CABG [OR=0.56, 95%CI (0.33, 0.93)] and CABG+MVR [OR=0.48, 95%CI (0.24, 0.94)], and the best probability ranking results showed that MVR might be the most effective in reducing the 30-day all-cause mortality rate. The incidence of renal complications in CABG+MVr was significantly lower than that in CABG+MVR [OR=0.42, 95%CI (0.21, 0.83)]; the best probability ranking results showed that CABG+MVr might be the most effective in reducing renal complications. ConclusionThe current limited evidence suggests that CABG+MVr and MVR may be the best surgical intervention methods for IMR patients at present. Due to the limitations of the number and quality of included studies, the above conclusions still need to be verified by more high-quality studies.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the differences in efficacy and outcomes between patients with functional mitral regurgitation (SMR) and degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) treated with mitral edge-to-edge repair (TEER) using MitraClip. MethodsPubMed, EMbase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), CNKI, Wanfang database, and VIP database were searched in computer. Relevant literature from the database from its establishment to January 2024 was covered. Literature screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment for the included studies were performed independently by two researchers. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata18.0 software. ResultsFourteen papers were finally included, including 6 707 patients, including 4 161 patients in the SMR group and 2 241 patients in the DMR group. Meta-analysis results showed that patients in the SMR group had a higher 1-year all-cause mortality rate [OR=1.53, 95%CI (1.30, 1.81), P<0.01, I2=0%] and 1-year readmission rate for heart failure [OR=1.9, 95%CI (1.60, 2.26), P<0.01, I2=0%] after MitraClip treatment than the DMR group patients. Postoperative mitral transvalvular pressure difference [SMD=-0.47, 95%CI (-0.65, -0.30), P<0.01, I2=51%] was lower in patients in the SMR group than in those in the DMR group, and the incidence of subsequent secondary open-heart surgery [OR=0.41, 95%CI (0.20, 0.83), P=0.01, I2=0%] was lower in patients in the SMR group. ConclusionThe results of Meta-analysis showed that after MitraClip treatment, patients in the SMR group showed better efficacy in the short term, but the medium- and long-term efficacy was not as good as that of patients in the DMR group. The specific type of mitral regurgitation should be considered when choosing a MitraClip treatment strategy to more accurately predict efficacy and prognosis.