ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficiency and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with aortic stenosis at intermediate-low risk compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).MethodsTwo researchers searched literatures independently in databases including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine disc, China National Knowledge Internet, VIP database for studies published from January 2012 to October 2017, then screened for propriate studies, collected information from different follow-up period all on the principle of Cocharan handbook. At last statistal analysis was performed in RevMan 5.3 to calculate relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI).ResultsThirteen studies were enrolled in this Meta-analysis with 10 753 patients, including 5 263 cases in TAVR group and 5 490 cases in SAVR group. Meta-analysis showed that there were no statistically significant differences in all-cause mortality between TAVR group and SAVR group in 30 days, 1 year or 2 years after operation [RR=0.96, 95%CI (0.75, 1.24), P=0.78; RR=0.84, 95%CI (0.68, 1.03), P=0.09; RR=0.97, 95%CI (0.84, 1.14), P=0.75]; while stroke more preferred SAVR no matter 30 days or 1 year [RR=0.64, 95%CI (0.51, 0.80), P<0.000 1;RR=0.76, 95%CI (0.63, 0.92), P=0.004].ConclusionThere is no significant difference in all-cause mortality of intermediate-low risk patients undergoing TAVR and SAVR, but TAVR perfoms better in terms of srtoke.
ObjectiveTo systematically assess the efficacy and safety of percutaneous access and surgical cutdown in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI).MethodsWe searched databases including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, OVID, Embase, China National Knowledge Internet and Wanfang Database to collect randomized or non-randomized controlled trials comparing percutaneous access (PC group, the trial/exposure group) with surgical cutdown (SC group, the control group) in TF-TAVI between January 2002 and October 2017. The quality evaluation and data extraction were carried out by 2 reviewers independently. The Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.5 software.ResultsA total of 11 literatures involving 4 893 aortic valve stenosis patients treated by TF-TAVI (2 877 patients in PC group and 2 016 patients in SC group) were included in this Meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between PC and SC group in terms of major vascular complications [odds ratio (OR)=0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.70, 1.06), P=0.17], minor vascular complications [OR=1.43, 95%CI (0.87, 2.37), P=0.16], major bleeding [OR=1.02, 95%CI (0.55, 1.90), P=0.94], minor bleeding [OR=0.90, 95%CI (0.51, 1.61), P=0.73] and all-cause mortality within 30 days [OR=1.03, 95%CI (0.76, 1.40), P=0.85]. As for the length of stay after TAVI, there was significant difference between the two groups [standard mean difference=–0.32, 95%CI (–0.52, –0.12), P=0.002].ConclusionPercutaneous access is as effective and safe as surgical cutdown in TF-TAVI, meanwhile leading to shorter length of stay after TAVI.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of Venus A-Valve and other overseas devices in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the baseline characteristics, procedural details, and postprocedural outcomes of severe AS patients who underwent TAVR with Venus A-Valve or overseas devices between April 2012 and January 2019 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University.ResultsA total of 342 AS patients undergoing TAVR were finally included, 238 with Venus A-Valve and the other 104 with overseas devices (43 with CoreValve, 33 with Lotus, 21 with SAPIEN XT, and 7 with SAPIEN 3). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups, and the proportion of patients with bicuspid aortic valve was around 50% in both groups. After successful valve implantation, all patients’ hemodynamics were significantly improved, with the median of maximum velocity decreased to 2.30 m/s (inter-quartile range: 0.60 m/s) and 2.50 m/s (inter-quartile range: 0.62 m/s), respectively (P=0.003). Postprocedural 30-day and 1-year all cause mortalities were similar (30-day: 5.9% vs. 1.9%, P=0.086; 1-year: 8.4% vs. 5.8%, P=0.307), while low incidence of procedure-related complications and improved life quality were achieved in both groups.ConclusionTAVR with the domestic Venus A-Valve is feasible, safe, and can produce favorable outcomes for AS patients, and especially for Chinese TAVR population with a high prevalence of bicuspid aortic valve.
Objective To explore the key genes, pathways and immune cell infiltration of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) with ascending aortic dilation by bioinformatics analysis. Methods The data set GSE83675 was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database (up to May 12th, 2022). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were analyzed and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was conducted using R language. STRING database and Cytoscape software were used to construct protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and identify hub genes. The proportion of immune cells infiltration was calculated by CIBERSORT deconvolution algorithm. Results There were 199 DEGs identified, including 19 up-regulated DEGs and 180 down-regulated DEGs. GSEA showed that the main enrichment pathways were cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, pathways in cancer, regulation of actin cytoskeleton, chemokine signaling pathway and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. Ten hub genes (EGFR, RIMS3, DLGAP2, RAPH1, CCNB3, CD3E, PIK3R5, TP73, PAK3, and AGAP2) were identified in PPI network. CIBERSORT analysis showed that activated natural killer cells were significantly higher in dilated aorta with BAV. Conclusions These identified key genes and pathways provide new insights into BAV aortopathy. Activated natural killer cells may participate in the dilation of ascending aorta with BAV.
Objective To explore the role of systolic and diastolic dysfunction in the prognosis of Chinese patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods CAD patients who underwent coronary arteriography in the Department of Cardiology of West China Hospital between July 2008 and June 2012 were included in this study. All the patients underwent color Doppler echocardiographic examination. Based on patients’ systolic and diastolic cardiac function, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <55% was as the systolic dysfunction and the ratio of mitral peak velocity of early filling to early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E/e’) >15 was as the diastolic dysfuntion. They were divided into normal cardiac function group (LVEF≥55%, E/e’ ratio≤15), systolic and diastolic dysfunction group (LVEF<55%, E/e’ ratio>15), diastolic dysfunction group (LVEF≥55%, E/e’ ratio>15) and systolic dysfunction group (LVEF<55%, E/e’ ratio≤15). The end points of follow-up were all-cause death and a major cardiovascular event (MACE). Results A total of 985 patients with complete echocardiographic report were included in this study. During the follow-up of (21.4±9.7) months, 46 patients (4.7%) died, and 52 (5.4%) had a MACE. Systolic dysfunction concomitant with diastolic dysfunction group and systolic dysfunction group patients had a higher risk of 36-month all-cause death (4.8%, 10.7%,P<0.001) and a higher risk of 41-month MACE (8.6%, 7.6%,P=0.028). Single factor analysis of all-cause death mortality showed that compared with the normal group, all-cause death mortality was the highest in systolic and diastolic dysfunction group (P<0.05), followed by diastolic dysfunction group (P<0.05) and systolic dysfunction group (P>0.05). Single factor analysis of MACE showed that compared with the normal group, MACE was still the highest in systolic and diastolic dysfunction group (P<0.05), followed by systolic dysfunction group (P<0.05) and diastolic dysfunction group (P>0.05). A multivariate Cox regression model analysis showed that compared with the normal group, the risk of all-cause death was the highest in the systolic and diastolic dysfunction group [hazard ratio (HR)=2.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.34, 6.54),P=0.007], followed by the systolic dysfunction group [HR=1.91, 95%CI (0.67, 5.42),P=0.224] and the diastolic dysfunction group [HR=0.95, 95%CI (0.40, 2.23),P=0.905]. Conclusion Compared with normal patients, patients with either systolic or diastolic dysfunction have a poorer prognosis, and patients with systolic dysfunction concomitant with diastolic dysfunction have the poorest prognosis.
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in aortic stenosis patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) versus tricuspid aortic valve (TAV). Methods This retrospective study included 252 consecutive patients with severe and symptomatic aortic valve stenosis undergoing TAVR in West China Hospital form April 2012 to September 2017, in whom 4 patients were excluded because of valve failure after surgical aortic valve replacement. Results Of the 248 patients, 131 had BAV and 117 had TAV. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups, including age [(73.56±6.35) vs. (74.31±6.35) years, P=0.354], male proportion (51.9% vs. 63.2%, P=0.072). Society of Thoracic Surgeons score for BAV patients was lower than that for TAV patients [(7.56±4.01)% vs. (8.78±5.14)%, P=0.037]. Procedural success rate was high in both BAV and TAV groups (95.4% vs. 98.3%, P=0.359). There was no difference in 30-day all-cause mortality (6.1% vs. 2.6%, P=0.176) between the two groups; the aortic valve maximum velocity of valve hemodynamics after TAVR was similiar [(2.39±0.53) vs. (2.31±0.45) m/s, P=0.262] between the two groups. Conclusions Patients with BAV show similar procedural and clinical outcomes to patients with TAV. Therefore, TAVR appears to be a safe and effective procedure for patients with BAV as well as those with TAV.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a mature technology. Because of the complicated valvular anatomy and the severe non-symmetrical valve calcification, the patient with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis (BAVs) once having a lower procedure successful rate, was considered as the relative contradiction for TAVR. However, with the application of the skirted and retrievable next generation prosthesis system, the outcomes of the treatment have been greatly improved. In this article, we summarized the current situation of TAVR applied in BAVs, and the outcomes difference of the old and new generation prosthesis systems.
Objective To compare the clinical and hemodynamic results of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with different vascular approaches. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the baseline status, procedure status, procedure-related clinical complications defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document, and postoperative hemodynamic results of patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR between April 2012 and January 2019 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Results A total of 436 patients were enrolled, including 58 patients undergoing surgical cutdown and 378 patients undergoing percutaneous puncture. The prevalence of tumor in the surgical cutdown group was higher than that in the percutaneous puncture group (8.62% vs. 2.65%, P=0.037), while the other baseline characteristics, including age, male proportion, body mass index, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores, were similar between the two groups (P>0.05); the proportion of patients with aortic regurgitation equal to or greater than a moderate degree in the surgical cutdown group was lower than that in the percutaneous puncture group (22.41% vs. 35.98%, P=0.043), and there was no statistically significant difference in other preoperative cardiac ultrasound-related indicators (P>0.05). The procedure success rate was high in both groups (96.55% vs. 98.68%, P=0.236). Immediately after operation, the incidences of new-onset left bundle branch block (43.10% vs. 24.87%, P=0.004), severe bleeding (12.07% vs. 4.23%, P=0.030), and mild bleeding (20.69% vs. 3.44%, P<0.001) were higher in the surgical cutdown group than those in the percutaneous puncture group, and the postoperative hemodynamics indicated that there was no statistically significant difference in maximum blood flow velocity between the two groups [(2.37±0.52) vs. (2.50±1.67) m/s, P=0.274]. At the 1 year follow-up, the cardiac death rate (5.17% vs. 3.17%, P=0.696) and all-causes mortality rate (8.62% vs. 8.47%, P=1.000) between the two groups were not statistically different.Conclusions Compared with percutaneous puncture, surgical cutdown is associated with a higher incidence of bleeding events, while the incidence of other clinical complications such as vascular complications and the postoperative hemodynamic outcomes were similar.