The diameter of the giant coronary artery aneurysm is at least 4 times bigger than that of the normal coronary artery and 2-3 times bigger than that of the normal coronary artery aneurysm. Giant coronary artery aneurysm is rare in clinic with a reported morbidity which is less than 0.3%. Just like ordinary coronary artery aneurysm, coronary artery atherosclerosis is the main cause of the giant coronary artery aneurysm. Most giant coronary artery aneurysms are asymptomatic, but some patients may have heart-related clinical emergency in short term and may have thrombosis which can lead to embolism and fistula which can cause rupture in long term. Surgical treatment is the first chioce for giant coronary artery aneurysm now. However, the interventional therapy will also be an important way to treat the disease in the future. In this article, we review the diagnosis, clinical manifestation, treatment and other aspects of giant coronary artery aneurysm as follows.
Atrial tachyarrhythmias is a known complication after cardiac surgery and represents a major cause of morbidity, increased length of hospital stay, and economic costs. Atrial fibrillation is the most common heart rhythm disorder. And it is often associated with other atrial tachyarrhythmias, such as atrial flutter (AFlu), premature atrial complexes, and multifocal atrial tachycardia. Postoperative atrial fibrillation is often self-limiting, but it may require anticoagulation therapy and either a rate or rhythm control strategy. We provide a complete and updated review about mechanisms, risk factors, and treatment strategies for the main atrial tachyarrhythmias (atrial fibrillation).
ObjectiveTo explore the risk factors for neonatal nosocomial infection and the pathogen resistance, in order to provide the basis for hospital infection control. MethodsSurveillance of hospital infection in newborns hospitalized for more than 48 hours were carried out from January to December 2012, and the risk factors for hospital infection were analyzed. ResultsThere were 54 newborn cases with neonatal nosocomial infection, and the infection rate of newborns was 1.25%. The major infection sites were respiratory tract (66.7%), gastrointestinal tract (18.5%), skin and soft tissues (9.2%). Birth weight (χ2Trend=126.88, P<0.001), hospitalization days (χ2Trend=106.89, P<0.001), invasive operation (χ2=5.338, P=0.021) were the major risk factors. A total of 54 strains of pathogenic bacteria were isolated from 54 newborn cases with neonatal nosocomial infection. Twenty-three strains of gram-positive bacteria accounted for 42.6%, which were generally resistant to penicillin and large ring lactone class antibiotic drugs. Thirty-one strains of gram-negative bacteria accounted for 57.4%, which were mainly resistant to the three generations of cephalosporins. ConclusionThe hospital infection rate of newborns is low. Birth weight, hospitalization days and invasive operation are the major risk factors for neonatal nosocomial infection.
ObjectiveTo compare the quality of life in the early stage of treatment in patients who accepted renal transplantation with those who still were undergoing long-term hemodialysis. MethodsPatients undergoing long-term hemodialysis in December 2011 and adult patients who planned to accept renal transplantation within 6 months were chosen to be our study subjects. The Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) was used for the study. After 6 months of following up, they were assessed with the same questionnaire again. Those hemodialysis patients who accepted renal transplantation within this period were divided into the intervention group. The quality of life between the two groups was compared then. ResultsA total of 124 end-stage renal failure patients were involved in our study, in which 79 patients successfully accepted renal transplantation (intervention group) and the other 45 patients who still underwent hemodialysis (control group). No other complications were observed during this period. There was no significant difference in life quality between the two groups before treatment (P>0.05). Six months after the treatment, SF-36 total score and each of the 8 dimension scores for the intervention group were all significantly higher than those for the control group (P<0.05). ConclusionRenal transplantation recipients have a totally better life quality than those who depend on hemodialysis.