Objective To investigate the cl inical effect of cervical artificial disc replacement (CADR) on twosegment cervical spondylosis and to research its influences on the range of motion (ROM) of the diseased segments and theadjacent superior and inferior segments. Methods From September 2004 to February 2007, 7 cases with cervical spondylosis at C4,5 and C5,6 were treated with CADR using Bryan artificial disc prosthesis, including 4 males and 3 females aged 30-45 years old (average 38.5 years old). All the patients had cervicodynia in various degrees, pain and numbness of l imbs and decreased muscle strength, including 3 cases of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, 3 of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and 1 of mixed cervical spondylosis. The course of disease was 12-54 months (average 27 months). Preoperatively, X-ray films revealed the intervertebral space of C4, 5 and C5,6 was narrowed and the cervical curve became straight, CT or MRI showed the intervertebral disk hernia of C4, 5 and C5,6, and the hyperostosis of vertebral margin compressed nerve root or spinal cord. All the patients had no response to the preopratively conservative treatment. JOA score and ROM of the diseased segments and the adjacent superior and inferior segments were compared before and after operation. Results All the patients survived the perioperative period, without hoarse voice, muscle spasm, dysphagia and cervicodynia. X-ray films showed the implanted prosthesis was well located, the height of intervertebral space was normal, and no prosthesis loosening, prosthesis migration and infection occurred 12 months after operation. All the 7 cases were followed up for 12-41 months (average 26.7 months). Cervicodynia and l imbs’pain and numbness disappeared, and muscle strength was improved obviously. The JOA score before and during the followup period was (8.35 ± 1.27) and (14.65 ± 1.61) points, respectively, indicating there was a significant difference (P lt; 0.05). For the ROM of C4,5 and C5,6, it was (8.38 ± 0.48)° and (9.16 ± 0.54)° before operation, respectively, and it increased to (11.15 ± 0.65)° and (12.75 ± 0.73)° after operation, respectively, showing there was a significant difference (P lt; 0.05). The ROM at C3,4 and C6,7 before operation was (9.71 ± 0.76)° and (12.39 ± 0.58)°, espectively, while it was improved to (10.26 ± 0.47)° and (13.67 ± 0.71)° after operation, respectively, indicating there were no significant differences between before and after operation (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The appl ication of Bryan Disc CADR for two-segment cervical spondylosis has satisfying therapeutic effects, can improve the ROM of diseased segments obviously, and has minor influences on the ROM of adjacent superior and inferior segment.
To compare the effectiveness of microdiscectomy and macrodiscectomy on the single-level lumbar disc protrusion (LDP). Methods Between November 2002 and October 2005, 241 patients with LDP underwent 2 surgical procedures: microdiscectomy (group A, 93 cases) and macrodiscectomy (group B, 148 cases). All patients had singlelevel LDP. In group A, there were 51 males and 42 females with an average age of 32.3 yeares (range, 18-47 years); there were 23cases of protrusion, 52 cases of prolapse, and 18 cases of sequestration with an average disease duration of 8.5 months (range, 1-18 months), including 8 cases at L2,3 level, 11 cases at L3,4 level, 35 cases at L4,5 level, and 39 cases at L5, S1 level. In group B, there were 81 males and 67 females with an average age of 31.8 years (range, 16-50 years); there were 37 cases of protrusion, 85 cases of prolapse, and 26 cases of sequestration with an average disease duration of 9.3 months (range, 1-20 months), including 9 cases at L2,3 level, 15 cases at L3,4 level, 63 cases at L4,5 level, and 61 cases at L5, S1 level. There was no significant difference in age, sex, segment level, type, or disease duration between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results Immediate back and sciatic pain rel ief was achieved in 225 (93.4%) patients after operation. The satisfactory rates were 91.4% in group A and 87.8% in group B at 1 week after operation, showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05). The length of incision, amount of bleeding, amount of drainage, and hospital ization time in group A were significantly fewer than those in group B (P lt; 0.05); while the operative time in group A was longer than that in group B, but showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05). Dural laceration occurred in 4 cases of groupA and 5 cases of group B, superficial infections of incision occurred in 5 cases of group B and intervertebral space nfections occurred in 4 cases of group B, and epidural hematoma occurred in 1 case of group A. The perioperative compl ication rate (5.4%, 5/93) in group A was significantly lower (P lt; 0.05) than that in group B (9.5%, 14/148). LDP recurred in 4 cases (4.3%) of group A and in 9 cases (6.1%) of group B postoperatively, showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05); of them, 11 cases received second operation and 2 cases were treated conservatively. All cases were followed up 36-77 months (mean, 51.4 months). There were significant differences in visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disabil ity index (ODI) between 2 groups at the last follow-up and preoperation (P gt; 0.05), but there was significant difference in VAS at 1 week postoperatively between 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). VAS and ODI were obviously improved at 1 week and last follow-up when compared with preoperation (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in the improvement rates of VAS and ODI between 2 groups at last follow-up (P gt; 0.05). According to cl inical evaluation of Modified Macnab criteria, the excellent and good rate was 90.3% in group A and 86.5% in group B at final follow-up (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion Both macrodiscectomy and microdiscectomy are effective for LDP, furthermore microdiscectomy is less invasive than macrodiscectomy. Microdiscectomy is recommended to treat single-level LDP.