Objective Through the methods of evidence-based medicine, to make an individualized treatment plan for a patient with achalasia. Methods Based on an adequate assessment of the patient’s condition, clinical issues aimed at this case were put forward. And the best clinical evidence related to achalasia treatment was evaluated after being retrieved from The Cochrane library (1990 to 2010) and PubMed (1980 to 2010). Results 33 studies were retrieved including 29 RCTs and 4 systematic reviews. The efficacy and safety of drug therapy, endoscopic injection of botulinum, endoscopic balloon dilatation and surgical therapy were evaluated. Cosidering symptoms,age and comorbidities, we recommended endoscopic balloon dilatation or laparoscopic Heller postoperative plus Dor fundoplication surgery for treatment. The patient’s choice is endoscopic balloon dilatation. Symptoms of patient were relieved after treatment. Conclusion Making a rational therapeutic plan for achalasia patients by means of evidence-based treatment not only can improve therapeutic effect but also be beneficial for both doctors and patients to share uncertain risks.
To evaluate the cl inical effect of pedical screw systems fixed between lumbar and il ium for treatment of sacral fractures. Methods From June 2003 to June 2009, 21 cases of sacral fracture (29 sides including monolateral 13 cases and bilateral 8 cases) were treated with pedical screw systems to have reduction and fixation. There were 12 males and 9 females, aging 23-59 years (38.2 years on average). Fractue was caused by traffic accident in 12 cases, by fall ingfrom height in 7 cases, and by crash in 2 cases. Screws were inserted into lumbar pedicles and il iac crests. Decompression was used in 4 cases compl icated by sacral nerves injury, and reductions and fixations were used in 12 cases compl icated anterior pelvic or acetabulum injury. The preoperative proximal displacement at the injured side of the pelvis was (16.29 ± 6.47) mm compared with contralateral pelvis. Results All incisions healed primarily with no compl ication of infection. Twentyone patients were followed up 6 months to 6 years. Cl inical heal ing time of fracture was 6-9 weeks. In 4 cases compl icated by S1 or S2,3 nerves injury, the function recovered completely after 4-9 weeks. In other 17 patients, no compl ication of intraoperative nerve injury occurred. All patients could walk and squat after 6-12 weeks of operation. No breakage or displacement of implant occurred. The postoperative proximal displacement at the injured side of the pelvis was (3.51 ± 0.68) mm compared with contralateral pelvis, showing significant difference (P lt; 0.01) when compared with preoperative one. Conclusion It is a novel choice to have reduction and internal fixation for sacral fracture with pedical screw systems fixed between lumbar and il ium. The strict regulation of indication and skill is the key to prevent compl ication.
Objective To make an individualized treatment plan for a newly diagnosed Barrett esophagus patient by means of evidence-based medicine. Methods After the clinical problems were put forward, both the systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were collected from The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2009) and PubMed (1995 to 2010) and SCIE (1995 to 2010). The treatment protocol was made by combining the evidence and the preference of patient. Results A total of 21 RCTs and 6 systematic reviews (meta-analyses) were identified. A rational treatment plan was made upon a serious evaluation and patient’s preferences: improving the lifestyle and adopting the APC therapy combined with acid-suppressive drugs (Omeprazole, 40 mg, bid) for six weeks. Three months later, the endoscope reexamination showed the patient was much better. After another twelve-month follow-up, the plan proved to be optimal. Conclusion In accordance with the evidence-based methods, the rational treatment plan made for a diagnosed Barrett esophagus male can effectively relieve symptoms and improve quality of life.