ObjectiveTo systematically review the effect of implementing the medicines zero mark-up policy in Chinese public hospitals.MethodsCNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, Sinomed, Web of Science, PubMed and EMbase databases were electronically searched to collect quantitative evaluations of the effect of implementing the medicines zero mark-up policy in Chinese public hospitals from inception to October 30th, 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Descriptive analysis was then performed.ResultsThe existing evidence on the effect of implementing the medicines zero mark-up policy in Chinese public hospitals was from 3 studies based on national samples and 7 provincial level studies in Beijing, Shannxi and Fujian. After the implementation of the medicines zero mark-up policy, all included studies found that the medicines expenditure and the proportion of medicines expenditure to the total expenditure per outpatient visit or per hospitalization decreased. The expenditures of medical supplies, tests & examinations per outpatient visit or per hospitalization increased, and the medical expenditure per outpatient visit or per hospitalization increased in Beijing. The hospital annual revenue generated from medicines and its proportion to the total annual revenue both decreased across the country. Although the government allocated increased subsidy to compensate the revenue reduction of the public hospitals due to the implementation of the medicines zero-mark-up policy, the total annual revenue of traditional Chinese medicine hospitals at the county level across the country still decreased significantly.ConclusionsBased on the available evidence, we conclude that the policy objective of abolishing the mechanism of "compensating medical care with revenue generated from prescribing medicines" is achieved, while that of establishing a scientific compensation mechanism for public hospitals are partially achieved. Compared with other regions, Beijing has appropriately adjusted the prices of medical care while removing the mark-up of medicines, thus is a contributor to the establishment of a scientific compensation mechanism for public hospitals.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of hydromorphone and morphine in post-cesarean section analgesia.MethodsThe Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and SinoMed databases were electronically searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of hydromorphone vs. morphine in the treatment of postoperative analgesia after cesarean section from the inception of the database to December 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literatures, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of the included trials. The meta-analysis was conducted with RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsSeven trials with 586 post-cesarean section patients were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that, compared with the morphine group, the hydromorphone group had lower 6 h (MD=–0.23, 95%CI –0.38 to –0.08, P=0.003), 12 h (MD=–0.56, 95%CI –1.10 to –0.02, P=0.04), 24 h (MD=–0.37, 95%CI –0.65 to –0.09, P=0.01) and 48 h (MD=–0.41, 95%CI –0.74 to –0.08, P=0.01) postoperative VAS scores the with epidural anesthesia pump (PECA). There was no statistically significant difference of the postoperative Ramsay scores between the two groups. In terms of side effects, the incidence of skin pruritus (RR=0.27, 95%CI 0.09 to 0.81. P=0.02) and vomit (RR=0.15, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.65, P=0.01) of the hydromorphone group were lower than those of the morphine group.ConclusionsThe current evidence demonstrate that, compared with morphine, hydromorphone has better postoperative analgesia performance and less risk of exhibiting skin pruritus and vomit after cesarean section. Considering of the overall quality of evidence and the relatively small pooled sample size, more well-conducted randomized controlled trials are required to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of sufentanil versus fentanyl used in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after cesarean section.MethodsAn online search of computerized searches of the database of MEDLINE (OVID), Web of Science, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and SinoMed were conducted. Randomized controlled trials published since the inceptions of these databases until April 1st 2018, involving the comparison of sufentanil versus fentanyl for PCIA after cesarean section were included. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was conducted using the RevMan 5.1 software.ResultsA total of 19 studies were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the fentanyl group, the sufentanil group had statistically significant lower VAS scores at 4-hour (MD=–0.99, 95%CI –1.03 to –0.95, P<0.001), 8-hour (MD=–0.30, 95%CI –0.40 to –0.21, P<0.001), 12-hour (MD=–0.54, 95%CI –0.62 to –0.46, P<0.001) and 24-hour (MD=–0.35, 95%CI –0.41 to –0.28, P<0.001); statistically significant higher Ramsay scores at 4-hour (MD=0.72, 95%CI 0.66 to 0.78, P<0.001), 8-hour (MD=0.93, 95%CI 0.86 to 1.00, P<0.001), 12-hour (MD=0.98, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.05, P<0.001), 24-hour (MD=0.07, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.11, P=0.000 5), 48-hour (MD=0.05, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.08, P<0.000 1). As for the adverse reactions, sufentanil group had lower risks of having nausea and vomiting (RR=0.25, 95%CI 0.19 to 0.31, P<0.001), pruritus (RR=0.41, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.57, P<0.001), dizziness (RR=0.27, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.44, P<0.001) and urinary retention (RR=0.35, 95%CI (0.15, 0.82), P=0.02).ConclusionsThe current evidence shows that, sufentanil has better analgesia and sedative effects, and less risks of adverse reactions for safer clinical use.
ObjectiveTo investigate the quality of life (QOL) and its influencing factors of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer returning to social life after treatment.MethodsFunctional assessment of cancer therapy-breast scale (FACT-B Scale) was adopted to investigate the QOL of the HER2 positive breast cancer survivors, who were admitted and treated during January 2015 and October 2019 in Fujian Provincial Hospital. The demographic, social and economic data, as well as the clinical information of the responded survivors were collected. Logistic regression model was adopted to analyze factors associated with the QOL of the responded survivors.ResultsA total of 117 responded survivors were included. The median of the FACT-B scale was 106.0 (91.0, 121.3) points out of 148 points (71.6%). With the control of the demographic, social and economic status of the responded survivors, as well as the time from diagnosis and treatment to responding to the follow-up, we found that "having other chronic conditions" was the risk factor for the HER2 positive breast cancer survivors to have higher QOL in the social life after treatment (OR=4.17, 95%CI 1.33 to 15.37, P=0.01).ConclusionsThe overall QOL of the HER2 positive breast cancer survivors in the social life after treatment was low. "Having other chronic conditions" was the risk factor for the HER2 positive breast cancer survivors to have higher QOL in the social life after treatment.