Objective To compare the short-term effectiveness of repairing distal tibiofibular syndesmosis with metal screws and absorbable screws. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 63 patients with ankle fracture combined with injury of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis admitted between January 2017 and January 2020. Among them, 31 patients were treated with absorbable screw fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis (research group) and 32 patients were treated with metal screw fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, surgical side, time from injury to operation, fracture type, preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time and fracture healing time were recorded and compared between the two groups. X-ray film was taken to evaluate the effect of ankle joint reduction and fixation. Olerud-Molander ankle fracture efficacy score (short for OM score), AOFAS score, and VAS score were used to evaluate the effectiveness. Results There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (t=−0.683, P=0.497). In the control group, 1 case of delayed healing and 1 case of poor healing occurred in the lateral incision after operation, which healed after dressing change; the rest of the patients had primary healing of the incision. Patients in both groups were followed up 12-24 months, with an average of 13.8 months. In the control group, 1 patient with fracture of pronation and external rotation walked with full weight bearing after removing the metal screw of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis at 8 weeks after operation, the anatomical plate of the lateral malleolus was broken, and the lateral malleolus was fixed again and recovered after 5 months; 1 patient had mild ankle pain after operation, and the pain disappeared after removing the metal screw of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis at 8 weeks. No complication such as nerve and blood vessel injury occurred in all patients. There was no significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups (t=−1.128, P=0.264). The AOFAS and VAS scores significantly improved in both groups at 12 months after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the OM scores, and the difference of AOFAS and VAS scores between before and after operation (P>0.05). Conclusion Using absorbable screws to repair the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis can effectively restore the ankle acupoint structure, prevent ankle instability, and restore good ankle function. There is no significant difference in effectiveness between absorbable screws and metal screws, and there is no need for secondary operation to remove screws.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of robot assisted internal fixation and traditional open reduction and internal fixation for calcaneal fractures.MethodsThe clinical data of 44 patients (44 feets) with calcaneal fracture admitted between October 2017 and December 2018 who met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed. According to different operation methods, they were divided into trial group (19 cases, treated with robot assisted percutaneous reduction and cannulated screw fixation through tarsal sinus incision) and control group (25 cases, treated with open reduction and internal fixation via traditional tarsal sinus incision). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injured side, cause of injury, fracture type, time from injury to operation, and preoperative Böhler angle, Gissane angle, calcaneus width, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Association (AOFAS) score, and other general data between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, and fracture healing time were recorded and compared between the two groups. Before operation and at 6 months after operation, the Böhler angle and Gissane angle were measured on the lateral X-ray film, and the calcaneal width was measured on the axial X-ray film of the calcaneus to evaluate the recovery of the deformity and collapse after surgical treatment; the AOFAS score was used to evaluate the function of the affected foot and ankle joint.ResultsThe operation time of the trial group was significantly longer than that of the control group (P<0.05), but the intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency was significantly less than that of the control group (P<0.05). In the control group, 1 case had skin necrosis, and 1 case had a little leakage from the incision; the rest of the two groups had no skin- and incision-related complications. Patients in both groups were followed up 6-12 months, with an average of 9.5 months. At 6 months after operation, the Böhler angle, Gissane angle, and calcaneal width in the two groups were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05); the fractures in the two groups were healed, there was no significant difference in healing time (t=–1.890, P=0.066); the AOFAS scores of the two groups were significantly higher than those before operation (P<0.05), and the AOFAS score of the trial group was significantly higher than that of the control group (t=–3.135, P=0.003).ConclusionCompared with traditional C-arm fluoroscopic internal fixation for calcaneal fractures, robot-assisted internal fixation via tarsal sinus incision for calcaneal fractures significantly improves the function of the affected foot and maintains the accuracy of nail implantation after fracture reduction, reducing intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and the fracture heals well.
Objective To investigate the effect of functional exercises at different time and different immobilization positions on the functional recovery of elbow joint with type C distal humeral fractures. Methods A total of 120 patients with type C distal humeral fractures admitted to the hospital between June 2013 and July 2015 were included in the study. They were randomly allocated to 3 groups, 40 patients in each group. Group A: functional exercises began immediately after the operation; Group B: the affected elbow was fixed at 90° flexion for 1 week and then began functional exercises after 1 week of immobilization; Group C: the affected elbow was fixed at 30° extension for 1 week and then began functional exercises after 1 week of immobilization. There was no significant difference in gender, age, fracture pattern, fracture side, injury time, and surgical approach between groups (P>0.05). Results In groups A and B, 1 case had incision redness and swelling respectively, and the other incisions healed by first intention. Five patients occurred myositis ossificans in group A, 4 cases in group B, and 5 cases in group C. The incidence of complications in groups A, B, and C was 15.0% (6/40), 12.5% (5/40), and 12.5% (5/40), respectively. There was no significant difference between groups (χ2=0.144, P=0.930). All patients were followed up 6-25 months, with an average of 9.8 months. At 2 weeks after operation, the Mayo elbow joint function score of group A was significantly higher than those of groups B and C (P<0.05), and the visual analogue scale (VAS) of group A was significantly lower than those of groups B and C (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between groups B and C (P>0.05). At 6 months after operation, there was no significant difference in Mayo elbow joint function score and VAS score between groups (P>0.05). At 2 weeks and 6 months after operation, the flexion and extension activities of elbow joint in groups A and C were better than that in group B (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between groups A and C (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in forearm rotation between groups (P>0.05). All fractures of 3 groups achieved clinical healing, and there was no significant difference in healing time between groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Early functional exercises can relieve pain and obtain better elbow flexion and extesion activities after operation. The elbow joint fixed at 30° extension is better than at 90° flexion in elbow flexion and extension activitis.
Objective To explore the impact of preoperative traction on the osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) in patients with femoral neck fractures. Methods Between February 2013 and May 2016, 120 patients with femoral neck fractures, who were treated with screw fixation, were collected. Sixty patients with fractures of Garden type Ⅰ and Ⅱ were non-displaced fracture group; 60 cases with fractures of Garden type Ⅲ and Ⅳ were displaced fracture group. The patients in 2 groups were randomly divided into traction and non-traction subgroups (n=30). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury mechanism, damage side, the time from injury to operation, and fracture classification between 2 subgroups (P>0.05). Intracapsular pressure was recorded before operation. The quality of fracture reduction and the satisfaction ratio of screw implant were evaluated during operation. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Harris score, joint mobility, and the incidence of ONFH would be evaluated at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after operation. Results All incisions of 2 groups healed by first intention after operation. There was no infection or deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity. All patients were followed up 2 years. In displaced and non-displaced fracture groups, the intracapsular pressure of traction subgroups were higher than that of non-traction group (P<0.05); the differences of the quality of fracture reduction and the satisfaction ratio of screw implant were not significant (P>0.05) between 2 subgroups. At 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after operation, VAS scores were higher in traction subgroup than in non-traction subgroup (P<0.05); and the joint mobility and Harris scores were lower in traction subgroup than in non-traction subgroup (P<0.05). X-ray films showed all fractures healed. Except for the non-displaced group at 6 months, the incidences of ONFH were higher in traction subgroup than in non-traction subgroup at other time points (P< 0.05). Conclusion Preoperative traction may increase the risk of ONFH, which can increase the intracapsular pressure and affect the blood supply of femoral head.