Objective To determine the influence of combinative assessment of 64 multi-slice spiral computer tomography (MSCT) and serum amyloid A protein (SAA) on the selection of operative procedures of upper rectal cancer in multi-disciplinary team. Methods Prospectively enrolled 110 patients, who were diagnosed definitely as upper rectal cancer (distance of tumor to the dentate line gt;7 cm) at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from August 2007 to October 2008, randomly assigned into two groups. In one group named MSCT+SAA group, both MSCT and SAA combinative assessment were made for the preoperative evaluation. In another group named MSCT group, only MSCT was made preoperatively. Then, the pooled data were analyzed for the correlative relationship between the choice of surgery strategy and clinicopathologic factors. Furthermore, the preoperative staging and predicted operative procedures were compared with postoperative pathologic staging and practical operative procedures, respectively. Results According to the criteria, 106 patients with upper rectal cancer were randomly assigned into MSCT+SAA group (n=52) and MSCT group (n=54). The baseline characteristics of two groups were statistically identical. When analyzing the proportion of multiple clinicopathologic factors in different operative procedures of upper rectal cancer, there were statistical differences in the preoperative N staging (P=0.003), M staging (P=0.022), TNM staging (P=0.003), serum level of SAA (P=0.005) and general category of tumor (P=0.027). For MSCT+SAA group the accuracies of preoperative staging T, N, M and TNM were 84.6%, 86.5%, 100% and 86.5%, respectively; For MSCT group the corresponding rates were 83.3%, 2.9%, 100% and 64.8%, respectively. There were statistically significant differences accuracies of preoperative N staging and TNM staging (P=0.005, P=0.009, respectively) in two groups. There was a statistically significant difference of the accuracy of prediction to operative procedures in two groups (96.2% vs. 81.5%, P=0.017). Conclusion Combinative assessment of 64 MSCT and SAA could improve the accuracy of preoperative staging, and thus provide higher predictive coincidence rate to operative procedures for surgeon.
Objective To determine the relationship between preoperative prognostic inflammatory and nutritional index (PINI) value and short-term prognosis in colorectal cancer. Methods Patients with colorectal cancer verified by pathologically examine were prospectively enrolled from April 2009 to June 2009. Serum alpha-1-acid glycoprotein, C-reactive protein, albumin and prealbumin were examined on day 3 before operation, and the value of preoperative PINI was calculated. The relationships between preoperative PINI and patho-TNM stage, complications, quality of life, and recurrence and metastasis after operation were analyzed. Results Total 38 patients with colorectal cancer underwent radical surgery were enrolled. Preoperative PINI value was 2.17±1.27. Preoperative PINI value was correlated with TMN stage and M stage: PINI value in patients of Ⅳ stage or M1 stage, were significantly higher than those in ones of Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ stage （P＜0.001） or M0 stage （P＜0.001）. There was no significant correlation between preoperative PINI value and preoperative complications （Pgt;0.05）. Preoperative PINI value was correlated with postoperative diet, anorexia and overall quality of life: preoperative PINI value in patients with abnormal diet, anorexia or poor quality of life, were significantly higher than those in ones with normal diet (P=0.020), no-anorexia (P=0.020) or moderate (P=0.025) and well (P=0.020) quality of life. Conclusion Preoperative PINI value is an effective index to assess the short-term prognosis of colorectal cancer.
Objective To determine the influence of combinative assessment of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and serum amyloid A protein (SAA) on the assessment of preoperative staging selection of operative procedures in the middle and lower rectal cancer. Methods Prospectively enrolled 130 patients, who diagnosed definitely as middle and lower rectal cancer at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from June 2008 to February 2009 were randomly assigned into two groups with 65 participants, respectively. In one group named TRUS combined SAA group, both TRUS and SAA combinative assessment were made for the preoperative evaluation. In another group named TRUS group, only the preoperative TRUS was made. The preoperative staging and predicted operative procedures were compared with postoperative pathologic staging and practical operation program, respectively.Results Of 118 patients with rectal cancer were actually included into TRUS combined SAA group (n=59) and TRUS group (n=59). The baselines of characteristics of two groups were basically identical. For TRUS combined SAA group， the accuracies of preoperative T and N staging were 79.7% (47/59) and 77.8% (42/54) respectively; For TRUS group the corresponding rates were 86.4% (51/59) and 57.7% (30/52), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference of the accuracy of preoperative T staging （P=0.609） while preoperative N staging had statistical difference (P=0.027) between two groups. There was a statistically significant difference of the accuracy of prediction to operative procedures in two groups 〔96.6% (57/59) vs. 83.1% (49/59), P=0.015〕. The preoperative T staging was related to the selection of operative procedures (P=0.037) when analyzing the relationship between the operative procedures and the multiple clinicopathological factors in middle and lower rectal cancer. ConclusionCombinative assessment of TRUS and SAA could improve the accuracy of preoperative staging in middle and lower rectal cancer, thus provide higher predictive coincidence rate to operative procedures for surgeon.