Objective To summarize the risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment experience of intra-abdominal bleeding following surgeries for severe acute pancreatitis. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of 347 patients underwent necrosectomy for severe acute pancreatitis between January 2011 and December 2015 at West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Results Of the 347 patients, thirty-eight patients had intra-abdominal bleeding after surgeries, including 5 patients who had twice bleeding. The bleeding positions including splenic vein (n=7), splenic artery (n=2), pancreatic and peripancreatic vessels (n=8), colonic mesangial vessels (n=6), other vessels (n=12), and extensive osmotic bleeding in abdominal cavity (n=7). Hemostatic modes: suture (n=20), compression hemostasis (n=18), transcatheteranerial embolism (n=2), suture and compression hemostasis (n=4), and conservative treatment (n=1). There were 19 dead patients of 38 bleeding patients. There were statistically significant differences between the hemorrhage group and the non-hemorrhage group on gender, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHEⅡ) scores and modified Marshall scores at admission, interval onset to surgery, surgical approaches, and morbidity (P<0.05). Compared with the non-hemorrhage group, there were more males, higher APACHE Ⅱ scores and modified Marshall scores, longer interval onset to surgery, and higher mortality in the hemorrhage group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that male patients had higher risk of intra-abdominal bleeding (OR=3.980, P=0.004), as the grow of APACHEⅡ scores, the risk of intra-abdominal bleeding increased (OR=1.487, P<0.001). Conclusions We should pay more attention on the male SAP patients as well as patients with multiple organ dysfunction.
At present, breast cancer is most common malignant tumor among female population. The treatment of breast cancer comprises surgery, radiotherapy, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, with surgical as the main treatment approach. Common surgical methods for breast cancer include breast conservation surgery (BCS) and mastectomy. This article reviews the recent researches about the survival of breast cancer patients receiving BCS, the quality of life for patients receiving BCS, the survival of young and elderly patients receiving BCS, BCS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, BCS for patients with breast cancer susceptibility gene mutation, and BCS for patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, so as to provide reference for the follow-up work of medical staff.
Objective To explore treatment strategy of pancreatic pseudocyst induced left-sided portal hypertension (LSPH) complicated with hypersplenism. Methods The clinical data of 49 cases of pancreatic pseudocyst induced LSPH complicated with hypersplenism from January 2010 to June 2015 in this hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 36 patients who were not complicated with upper gastrointestinal bleeding were designed to splenectomy group and non-splenectomy group based on splenectomy or not. The epidemiological and clinical features, intraoperative and postoperative results of these two groups were compared. Results There were 38 males and 11 females with age ranging from 22 to 67 years old. As for 13 patients suffering LSPH complicated with hypersplenism caused by pancreatic pseudocyst with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, one patient didn’t accept splenectomy, then the upper gastrointestinal bleeding recurred and the hypersplenism was not alleviated after operation; Whereas, the hypersplenisms were relieved in the others patients after operation. In the 36 patients without upper gastrointestinal bleeding who were complicated with hypersplenism, 23 patients were performed splenectomy (splenectomy group) and 13 patients were not (non-splenectomy group). In the splenectomy group, the blood loss, operation time, and intraoperative blood transfusion were significantly more than those of the non-splenectomy group (P<0.05). The hospital stay and the discharged laboratory examinations had no significant differences between the splenectomy group and the non-splenectomy group (P>0.05) except for the platelet count. Furthermore, the incidence of the postoperative upper gastrointestinal bleeding was lower (P<0.05) and the relief rate of hypersplenism was higher (P<0.05) in the splenectomy group as compared with the non-splenectomy group. Conclusions For pancreatic pseudocyst induced LSPH with hypersplenism, we should be vigilant and early intervent. Usually, primary focus can be treated only. However, splenectomy can effectively relieve hypersplenism and prevent recurrent bleeding for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding or patients with close adhesion of pancreas tail and spleen inflammatory lesions and constricting splenic hilus.