Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of meglumine adenosine cyclophosphate (MAC) for chronic heart failure. Methods The databases such as Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 3, 2011), MEDLINE (1950 to March 2011), EMbase (1980 to March 2011), CNKI (1995 to March 2011), and VIP (1989 to March 2011) were searched, and the relevant journals and conference proceedings were also manually retrieved. Then the studies were screened according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and their quality was evaluated. Meta-analyses were performed by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results Seventeen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1 281 patients were included. All of the included RCTs were Grade C in methodological quality. The results of meta-analyses showed that MAC plus routine treatment was superior to routine treatment in improving the left ventricular ejection fraction (WMD=5.75, 95%CI 3.61 to 7.89), stroke volume (SV) (WMD=5.55, 95%CI 3.71 to 7.38), E/A (WMD=0.09, 95%CI 0.05 to 0.14) and 6 min walk test (WMD=43.52, 95%CI 21.00 to 66.04). But MAC plus routine treatment was similar to routine treatment in regulating cardiac index (CO) (WMD=0.20, 95%CI –0.31 to 0.71) and heart rate (WMD=0.64, 95%CI –7.49 to 8.77). No significant adverse effects or allergic reactions were reported. Conclusion The current evidence shows that MAC may improve the left ventricular ejection fraction, stroke volume, E/A and 6 min walk test. Due to a high risk of selection bias and detection bias in the included studies, the evidence is insufficient to determine the effectiveness of MCA. Further large-scale trials are required to define the role of MAC in the treatment of chronic heart failure.