Objective To investigate the technique and feasibility of hepatic pedicle vascular control in laparoscopic hepatectomy. Methods From May 2005 to June 2011, 95 cases of hepatectomies were performed by laparoscopy in the Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University.The characteristics of these cases were analyzed. Results Left lateral segmentectomy were required in 21 patients, left hepatectomy in 13 patients, right hepatectomy in 4 patients, segmentectomy in 17 patients, tumor resection in 24 patients,hemangioma resection in 5 patients, and conversions to laparotomy in 11 patients. The intermittent Pringle maneuver were performed in 39 patients. The mean vascular clamping time in Pringle maneuver was （30.84±9.51） min. The selective vascular control of inflow were performed in 56 patients， the technique included intrahepatic Glisson approach in 14 patients and controlling hepatic artery and portal vein separately in 42 patients. Pre-parenchymal transection control of hepatic outflow were performed in 12 patients, included the left hepatic vein were controlled by suturing or separating in 11 patients and right hepatic vein was controlled by separating in 1 patient. Others were controlled intraparenchymally during transection. The mean operative time was （236.80±95.97） min，mean operative blood loss was（ 551.55±497.41） ml， concentrate red blood cells transfusion volume was（ 2.60±2.23） U， and plasma transfusion volume was （211.90±179.29） ml. The postoperative complications included bleeding in 4 patients, pleural effusion in 4 patients, pneumonia in 3 patients, ascites in 7 patients, and biliary fistula in 2 patients, and dead in 1 patient. The mean hospitalization time was（ 12.47±4.18） days. At the deadline（ February 2012）, 72 cases with liver cancer were followup. The follow-up time ranged from 5 to 81 months and the mean time was（ 24.14±16.62） months， where survival rate was 68.4%（ 54/79） of 1-year and 21.5%（ 17/79） of 3-year. Conclusions The application of hepatic pedicle vascular control in laparoscopic hepatectomy is feasible.
Objective To study the effect of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision and per anum rectal pull-type of anastomosis on male patients with low rectal cancer. Methods The successful experiences of anus saving operation on 23 male patients with low rectal cancer were summarized. Results A laparoscopic total mesorectal excision technique was used, with the full separation of the rectum at the bottom. After pulling out the distal rectum together with the cancer from the anus, the transection of the proximal tumor was performed. The end-to-end anastomosis of rectum and descending colon was performed by tubular stapler. Anus was reserved successfully in the 23 cases. There was no left-tumor stump after surgery detected by postoperative pathological examinations, no anastomotic leakage, and no operative death. Conclusions To the relatively narrow male pelvis, laparoscopic total mesorectal excision and per anum rectal pull-through resection and anastomosis is safe and reliable for anus saving in low rectal cancer. It can simplify the operation, and raise the success rate of sphincter preserving in surgery of low rectal cancer.
ObjectiveTo analyze the surgical effect, postoperative complications and effects on the body inflammatory response of laparoscopic gastroduodenal perforation repair, and to further evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic perforation repair. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 123 patients with gastroduodenal ulcer perforation treated between February 2010 and February 2015. Among the patients, 65 underwent laparoscopic gastroduodenal ulcer perforation repair (laparoscopic group), and 58 underwent routine open gastroduodenal ulcer perforation repair (open group). Then, we compared the surgical effects (average bleeding volume, ambulation time, postoperative ventilation time, postoperative hospital stay), postoperative complications (wound infection, wound dehiscence, gastroduodenal fistula, abdominal abscess, intestinal obstruction), inflammatory reaction[preoperative and 1, 3, 5-day postoperative white blood cells (WBC) count, peripheral blood procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP)] between the two groups. ResultsPatients in both the two groups underwent the surgery successfully. No patients in the laparoscopic group were transferred to open surgery. Compared with the open surgery, surgical bleeding volume, ambulation time, anal exhaust time and postoperative hospital stay of the laparoscopic group were significantly different (P < 0.05). Postoperative complications rate of the laparoscopic group was significantly lower than that of the open group (P < 0.05). One and 3-day WBC, PCT and CRP after surgery increased obviously in both the two groups. The above three indicators on the fifth day after surgery were not significantly different from those before the surgery in the laparoscopic group (P > 0.05), while they were significantly different from those before the surgery in the open group (P < 0.05). ConclusionsCompared with open perforation repair, laparoscopic perforation repair surgery is superior for its better surgical effects, fewer postoperative complications and lighter inflammatory response. It is a safe, effective and minimally-invasive treatment for gastroduodenal perforation.
Objective To refine the technique of portal inflow occlusion and parenchymal transection for laparoscopic hepatectomy in the porcine model. Methods Ten pigs were used. The portal inflow complete or selective occlusion was carried out with portal triad clamping or dissection and division of the left portal pedicle. The sequential laparoscopic local hepatectomy, left lateral lobectomy, and left medial lobectomy were performed without portal inflow occlusion. Parenchymal transection was performed with harmonic scalpel, LigaSure, microwave dissector, bipolar electrocautery, surgical clips, and endoscopic stapler. The efficacy and safety of different techniques in laparoscopic parenchymal transection of the liver were compared. Results The ischemic liver was darken with complete or selective portal triad clamping. The ischemic demarcation line between left and right lobe was obvious with the dissection and division of the left portal pedicle. There was an applicable scope of each hepatic parenchymal transection apparatus. The optimal combination of different techniques could increase efficacy and reduce hemorrhage in laparoscopic parenchymal transection of the liver. Conclusion Technical refinements of portal inflow occlusion and parenchymal transection in porcine models could provide evidences to clinical appliance of laparoscopic anatomic major hepatectomy.
Objective To evaluate the feasibility, safety, radicality, and short-term and mid-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision （TME） in comparison with open procedure for the middle-lower rectal cancer. Methods From October 2005 to October 2008， 52 patients with middle-lower rectal cancer received laparoscopic TME （Dixon’operation） without preventive stoma， while 46 patients underwent conventional open TME （Dixon’operation） without preventive stoma. The operative procedures, clinicopathological data， and short-term and mid-term outcomes were collected and compared between the two groups. Results The other patients were successful in both groups in addition to 2 （3.8%） patients were converted to open procedure in laparoscopic TME group. There was no perioperative death in both groups. The intraoperative blood loss, the time for bowel movement retrieval （first flatus）， and the incision healing in laparoscopic TME group were better than that in open TME group （P＜0.05）. No significant differences were observed between two groups in anastomotic leakage and pulmonary infection （P＞0.05）. Comparison of specimen, no significant differences were observed between two groups in negative distal margin and circumferential resection margin, number of lymph nodes resected, distance of distal resection margin to the tumor （P＞0.05）. No significant differences were observed between two groups in cancer-related death, local recurrence, distant metastasis, and 3-year survival rate （P＞0.05）. Conclusions Laparoscopic TME for middle-low rectal cancer is a safe, feasible, and minimally invasive technique, and can achieve satisfactory oncological outcome, which provides similar short-term and mid-term outcome compared with the traditional open procedure.
Objective To explore the surgical techniques and the clinical effect of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal （TAPP） hernia repair for recurrent inguinal hernia. Methods Clinical data of 130 cases of recurrent inguinal hernia who underwent TAPP hernia repair from Mar. 2009 to Dec. 2012 in Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital of Capital Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. Results Operations were completed successfully in 129 cases and 1 case was converted to open surgery. The operation time was （54.5±16.1） min （30-100min） and the hospital stay was （4.5±2.1） d （2-11d）. The rates of postoperative pain， hydrocele， and urinary retention were 3.8% （5/130），11.5% （15/130）， and1.5% （2/130） respectively. There were no complications such as foreign body sensation，wound infection，and intestinal obstruction after operation. All cases were followed-up for 7-50 months 〔（24.3±11.3） months）〕 with no recurrence was observed. Conclusions Laparoscopic TAPP hernia repair for recurrent inguinal hernia has advantages of minimal invasion and few complications，who is safe and effective.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical effect and safety of laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery combined with gestrinone in the treatment of adenomyosis. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 82 patients with adenomyosis who accepted treatment in our hospital from January 2008 to April 2011. According to different treatment method, the patients were divided into three groups. Twenty-seven patients in the treatment group underwent laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery combined with postoperative treatment with gestrinone. For the 25 patients in the surgery group, only laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery was performed, and 30 other patients who only received oral gestrinone were designated as the medicine group. Dysmenorrhea, menstrual volume, uterine size, serum carcinoembryonic antigen 125 (CA125), anemia, and drug side effects were respectively recorded before and after surgery. ResultsThe dysmenorrhea degree reduced significantly in all the three groups. There was no significant difference in the degree of dysmenorrhea, menstrual volume, and uterine volume between the treatment group and the surgery group (P>0.05); the dysmenorrhea degree was significantly different between the treatment group and the medicine group (P<0.05); the differences in hemoglobin levels and the serum CA125 level between the treatment group and the surgery group 12 months later were significant (P=0.019, P=0.049). ConclusionThe laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery combined with gestrinone in treating adenomyosis can improve recent curative effect and provide more effective symptom control compared with surgery alone.
Objective To investigate the effects of hand assistant laporoscopic splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization on systemic stress responses. Methods Forty patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension were selected， 20 cases of which were underwent hand assistant laparoscopic splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization (LAP group)， and the other 20 were underwent open splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization (OP group). The levels of blood glucose （BG）, insulin (Ins), triiodothyronine （T3）, tetraiodothyronine （T4）, corticosteroid （CS） and other related clinical data were measured before operation and on day 1-3 after operation, which were compared between two groups. Results There was no statistical significance between two groups on those levels before operation. On day 1 after operation， BG and CS level in both two groups were higher than those before operation (P＜0.05), but they were recovered on day 2 after operation in LAP group (Pgt;0.05), and on day 3 after operation in OP group (Pgt;0.05). BG and CS level in OP group were markedly higher than those in LAP group on day 2 after operation (P＜0.05). On day 1 after operation， Ins, T3 and T4 level of two groups were lower than those before operation (P＜0.05), but they were recovered on day 2 after operation in LAP group (Pgt;0.05) and on day 3 after operation in OP group (Pgt;0.05). Ins, T3 and T4 level in OP group were lower than those in LAP group on day 2 after operation (P＜0.05). There was no significant difference in operation time between two groups (Pgt;0.05). But laparoscopic surgery had more advantages than conventional open surgery such as reducing bleeding quantity in operation, shortening recovery time of bowel and urinary bladder function and the length of stay. Conclusion Compared with laparotomy, the laparoscope not only imposes less impact on physical stress system, but also makes recovery after operation more quickly.
Objective To compare the feasibility， safety， and efficiency of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal （TEP）hernia repair surgery and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal （TAPP） hernia repair surgery. Methods The clinical data of 95 patients with inguinal hernia who underwent laparoscopic TEP hernia repair surgery （TEP group） and TAPP hernia repair surgery （TAPP group） from Mar. 2010 to Oct. 2013 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed， and clinical parameters including operation time， intraoperative blood loss， postoperative hospital stay， postoperative comp-lication， and operation cost of 2 groups were compared. Results All the procedures were successful， none of them was converted to open surgery. There was no significant difference between TEP group and TAPP group when considering operation time 〔（65±16） min vs.（68±17） min〕， intraoperative blood loss 〔（7.0±1.2） mL vs. （8.0±1.4） mL〕， visual pain analogue scale 〔（2.0±1.1） score vs. （1.8±1.1） score〕， postoperative hospital stay 〔（3.1±1.4） d vs. （3.3±1.2） d〕，and time to release to regular activities 〔（4.2±1.0） d vs. （4.5±1.2） d〕， P＞0.05. But the operation cost of TEP group was significantly lower than that of TAPP group 〔（8 033±536） yuan vs. （9 632±643） yuan， P=0.007〕. There were 6 atients （6.3%， 6/95） suffered complications， 3 cases in TEP group and 3 cases in TAPP group， including 3 cases of seroma or hematoma in scrotum， 1 case of transient neurapraxia， and 3 cases of urinary retention. There was no signi-ficant difference in incidence rate of postoperative complication between the 2 groups （P=1.000）. All patients were followed-up for 1-35 months 〔（20.0±10.2） months〕 without recurrence and chronic pain. Conclusions TEP and TAPP hernia repair surgery are feasible， safe， effective， and minimally invasive technique for inguinal hernioplasty. There are advantages and disadvantages of both TAPP and TEP hernia repair surgery， but there is no statistically significant difference regarding intraoperative and postoperative complications.
Objective To evaluate the clinical application of hand assisted laparoscopic radical surgery for gastric cancer. Methods From June 2010 to September 2011，a series of 51 patients were undertook hand assisted laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy （hand assisted group），49 patients were undertook laparoscopic assisted D2 gastrectomy （laparoscopic group），the secure indexes of surgery effect in perioperative period were compared betwee two groups. Results The incision length was （6.82±0.33） cm and （5.74±1.11） cm （t=6.57，P=0.00），numbers of harvested lymph nodes were 16.10±5.11 and 14.16±3.60 （t=2.18，P=0.03），intraoperative bleeding was （249.40±123.40） ml and （251.00±90.40） ml （t=-0.74，P=0.94），operation time was （177.7±23.8） min and （188.1±16.9） min （t=-2.53，P=0.01），postoperative hospital stay was （11.12±5.02） d and （10.88±3.13） d （t=0.29，P=0.78） in the hand assisted group and in the laparoscopic group，respectively. One case of gastric atony happened in the hand assisted group，one case of gastric atony and incision infection happened in the laparoscopic group. No mortality case was found in two groups. Conclusions Hand assisted laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy is less difficult，and shorter operation time，and considerable treatment effection as compared with laparoscopic operation.