ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction between the ligament advanced reinforcement system (LARS) and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft. MethodsBetween July 2007 and July 2011, 50 cases (50 knees) of ACL injury were treated with LARS in 24 cases (LARS group) and with BPTB in 26 cases (BPTB group), respectively. There was no significant difference in age, gender, time from injury to surgery, and injury reason between BPTB group and LARS group (P gt; 0.05). The postoperative rehabilitation protocol was performed in 2 groups. ResultsAll incisions healed at the first stage. All patients were followed up 2-3 years. The results of Lachman test, anterior drawer test, and pivot shift test were negative. Screw loosening in femur and tibia occurred in 1 case of each group respectively, anterior knee pain in 2 cases of BPTB group and in 1 case of LARS group. The Lysholm and Tegner scores were significantly higher in LARS group than in BPTB group at 2 and 6 months after operation (P lt; 0.05); but no significant difference was found between 2 groups at 12 and 24 months (P gt; 0.05). The IKDC scores showed no significant difference between 2 groups at different time points after operation (P gt; 0.05). During follow up, KT-1000 arthrometer and knee stability showed significant differences in antedisplacements of the tibia between 2 groups at all time points after operation (P lt; 0.05). ConclusionLARS has less trauma and earlier functional recovery than BPTB autograft for ACL reconstruction, but the long-term effectiveness is similar.
Objective To explore the operative techniques and prel iminary cl inical effect of arthroscopic reconstruction of posterior cruciate l igament (PCL) using l igament advanced reinforcement system (LARS). Methods From June 2006 to July 2007, 9 patients with PCL rupture were treated with LARS under arthroscopic observation. There were 8 males and 1 female, aged 23-49 years old. The left knee was involved in 3 cases and the right knee in 6 cases. The main causes of injuries were sports in 5 cases, fall ing in 1 case and traffic accident in 3 cases. The time from injury to reconstruction was6-20 days (13.6 days on average). There were 2 cases with associated medial meniscus injury and 1 with lateral meniscus injury. X-ray films showed no avulsion fracture of tibial plateau was found. The preoperative Lysholm score was 40-55 (50 on average). According to the preoperative international knee documentation commitee (IKDC) grading, 1 case was graded as C and 8 as D. The Lachman test showed that there was 1 case (+), 6 cases (++) and 2 cases (+++). The operation was performed under arthroscopic observation. The tibial isometric point and tunnel were drilled with the help of a drill bit guide, while the femoral isometric point and tunnel were drilled under the C-arm X-ray machine. The diameter of the bone tunnels was 6 mm, while the diameters of LARS artificial l igaments and canulated interference screws were 7 mm. Results All the patients were regularly followed up for 8-16 months (10.5 months on average). The postoperative Lysholm score was 70-95 (85 on average). There were 5 cases of excellent, 3 of good and 1 of fair, with the choiceness rate of 88%. The postoperative IKDC grading showed that 7 cases were graded as A and 2 as B. The Lachman test showed that no case was positive. Compl ications such as infection, spontaneous rupture or laxity of graft were not observed. Conclusion PCL arthroscopic reconstruction with the use of LARS artificial l igaments leads to a good anatomic reconstruction and knee function with minor injury, rapid recovery and satisfactory cl inical effect.