Abstract: Objective To evaluate the early and long-term results for the management of giant left ventricular aneurysm with comparison of different surgical ventricular restructive approaches. Methods Between January 1992 and December 2004, 148 consecutive patients underwent repair of giant left ventricular aneurysms and were divided into two groups, conventional group： 89 patients were submitted to linear repair; modified group： 59 patients were submitted to endocardium encircle suturing remodeling（EESR）. There were no significant difference in New York Heart Association （NYHA） class Ⅲ /Ⅳ , left ventricular dysfunction before operation, aortic clamp time and number of coronary bypass grafts in two groups. Results Five patients died after operation （3. 4%）, 4 cases in conventional group and 1 case in modified group, the hospital mortality rate was 4.5% vs. 1.7% （P=0. 320）. The major morbidity were low cardiac output syndrome and ventricular fibrillation. One hundred and thirty-four patients （93.7 % ） were followed up, during a mean follow-up of 51.4± 27.0 months （range 1-120 months）, 21 patients had died. The NYHA class more than m in the early stage after operation was the independent risk factor for late death （P= 0. 000）. Actuarial survival rates were 91.6% of modified group vs. 76.3% of conventional group at 5 years （P=0.040）, and 91.6% vs. 61.4% at 8 years（P=0.000）. At late follow-up the meanNYHAclass, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension （LVEDD） and left ventricular ejection fraction （LVEF） were significant improved （P = 0. 000）in both groups. The rate of re-dilatation of LVEDD was higher in conventional group than that in modified group （ 38.8% vs. 16.7%, P= 0. 030）. Conclusion The technique of repair of postinfarction dyskinetic giant left ventricular aneurysms should be adapted in each patient to the cavity size and shape, and the dimension of the scar. The EESR achieves better results with respect to perioperative mortality, late functional status and survival than linear repair.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of modified left ventricular reconstruction (LVR) and linear repair (LR) to post-infarct left ventricular aneurysm (LVA) and summarize the surgical experience of LVA. MethodsFrom May 2004 to December 2011, 47 patients were admitted in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Medical College of Shanghai Jiaotong University. There were 25 patients underwent LVR (group LVR, including 21 males and 4 females), 18 patients underwent LR (group LR, including 14 males and 4 females) and 4 patients underwent directly sutured (including 3 males and 1 female). Among them, 42 patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). During 6-24 months'follow-up, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), quality of life and activity were measured. ResultsPostoperative LVEF was significantly higher than preoperative LVEF in group LVR(49.2%±13.6% vs. 32.5%±12.9%, P < 0.05) and group LR (47.5%±11.6% vs. 36.9%±11.6%, P < 0.05). One patient died in LR group (5.5%) and 1 died in LVR group (4.0%), no death occurred in directly sutured surgery. Total mortality was 4.2%. ConclusionLVR and LR are both effective treatment for LVA. Personalized treatment can receive satisfactory short-and long-term outcomes.