Objective To evaluate the cl inical effectiveness of open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of occult Lisfranc injury. Methods Between July 2002 and July 2009, 47 patients with occult Lisfranc injuries underwent open reduction and internal fixation. There were 31 males and 16 females with an average age of 35.6 years (range, 19-66 years). Injuries were casused by traffic accident in 27 cases, fall ing from height in 11 cases, sport in 16 cases, and crush in 3 cases. Thelocations were left foot in 18 cases and right foot in 29 cases. Simple medial column was involved in 6 cases, medial and middle columns in 24 cases, middle and lateral columns in 13 cases, and three columns in 4 cases. Base fractures of metatarsal bone were identified in all cases. The time from injury to operation was 4-21 days (mean, 8.6 days). The unstable Lisfranc joints were reduced and fixed by plates, screws, staples, and Kirschner wire through 1 or 2 longitudinal dorsal incisions. Results One case had infection and wound was repaired with flap at 2 weeks after operation; the other wounds healed primarily. Thirty-two patients were followed up 28.3 months on average (range, 12-75 months). The mean time of fracture heal ing was 12.3 weeks (range, 9-15 weeks). Osteoarthritis at midfoot was found in 15 cases at last follow-up and arthrodesis was not needed. The results were excellent in 9 cases, good in 16 cases, fair in 4 case, and poor in 3 cases according to American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score system; the excellent and good rate was 78.1%. No re-dislocation occurred during the followup. Conclusion More attention should be paid to base fractures of metatarsal bone, operative exploration is conducive to diagnosis of occult Lisfranc injury. Suitable internal fixation should be selected according to injury type and concomitant injury. Anatomical reduction and stable fixation are the keys to reconstruct the joint stabil ity in the initial treatment of occult Lisfranc injury
Objective To review the progress in the mechanism of injury, diagnosis, classification, and treatment method of Lisfranc injury. Methods Recent l iterature concerning the mechanism of injury, classification, diagnosis, and treatment method of Lisfranc injury was extensively reviewed, analyzed, and summarized. Results Because of the compl icate anatomy and high missed diagnosis rate, CT imaging were often recommended for diagnosis, and MRI could be used if necessary. The current recommendations for internal fixation included the use of Kirschner wires, cannulated screws, absorbablescrews, and plate. Conclusion Classification according to the columnar theory is significant for cl inical guiding. With thecl inical appl ication of internal fixation materials, more choices were provided, which make patients get the best effect.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in treatment of acute and delayed occult Lisfranc injuries.MethodsA retrospective review of 26 patients with occult Lisfranc injuries who were treated with ORIF between July 2010 and July 2015 was applied. Fourteen patients were treated within 6 weeks after injury (acute group) and 12 patients were treated after 6 weeks of injury (delayed group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in gender, age, affected sides, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and physical and mental scores of Study Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) (P<0.05). The joint reduction, internal fixator, and traumatic osteoarthritis were observed by X-ray films. The pain degree, midfoot function, and quality of life were evaluated with VAS score, AOFAS score, and physical and mental scores of SF-12.ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention with no complications. All patients were followed up with the mean follow-up time of 15 months (range, 12-24 months) in acute group and 15 months (range, 12-23 months) in delayed group. At last follow-up, the VAS score, AOFAS score, and physical and mental scores of SF-12 were superior to those before operation in the two groups (P<0.05). And there was no significant difference in all indicators between the two groups (P>0.05). The satisfaction rates were 100% and 83.3% (10/12) in acute group and delayed group, respectively. The internal fixators were removed in 20 patients (11 cases in acute group and 9 cases in delayed group) at 9-24 months after operation (mean, 14.5 months). The results of X-ray films showed no traumatic osteoarthritis, midfoot collapse, internal fixation failure, or reduction loss during follow-up period.ConclusionORIF is an ideal method for both acute and delayed occult Lisfranc injuries and can obtain the similar effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of indirect fixation of the 3rd tarsometatarsal joint in the treatment of high-energy Lisfranc injury.MethodsBetween February 2015 and February 2019, 15 patients with high-energy Lisfranc injury were treated. There were 12 males and 3 females with an average age of 44.8 years (range, 29-73 years). The average time from injury to admission was 8.8 hours (range, 2-28 hours). According to Myerson classification, there were 6 cases of type A, 4 cases of type B2, 1 case of type C1, and 4 cases of type C2; 8 cases were open injury. The 3rd tarsometatarsal joint was injured in all patients, including intact intermetatarsal ligament in 7 cases, the 2nd-3rd intermetatarsal ligament injury in 6 cases, the 3rd-4th intermetatarsal ligament injury in 1 case, and the 2nd-3rd-4th intermetatarsal ligament injury in 1 case. Among them, the 3rd tarsometatarsal joint was not fixed directly and indirectly fixed by stabilized the 2nd and 4th tarsometatarsal joints in 13 cases. The 3rd tarsometatarsal joint was fixed with Kirschner wire in 2 cases for 1 patient had complete injury of the intermetatarsal ligament and the other 1 had comminuted fracture of the base of the 3rd metatarsal. The reduction of fracture and dislocation was evaluated by X-ray films, focusing on the re-displacement of the 3rd tarsometatarsal joint. The effectiveness was evaluated by American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score.ResultsThirteen of the 15 patients were followed up 12-26 months, with an average of 15.6 months. One case had superficial infection of the incision and healed after symptomatic treatment; the other incisions healed by first intention. At last follow-up, the VAS score was 0-3 (mean, 1.1) and the AOFAS score was 70-99 (mean, 87.5). Twelve patients achieved anatomical reduction and 1 patient had increased talar-first metatarsal angle and the mild forefoot abduction. During the follow-up, no loss of reduction of the 3rd tarsometatarsal joint was found, while the spontaneous fusion of the joint was observed in 2 patients.ConclusionIn high-energy Lisfranc injury, as long as the intermetatarsal ligament is not completely destroyed and the bony structure of the tarsometatarsal joint is intact, the 3rd tarsometatarsal joint does not need to be fixed routinely, the stability of the joint can be obtained indirectly by fixing the adjacent tarsometatarsal joint.