ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) with PPV combined ILM peeling for macular hole retinal detachment (MHRD) in high myopia.MethodsA retrospective clinical study. From October 2012 to January 2019, 78 patients (78 eyes) with high myopia macular hole retinal detachment diagnosed from Chongqing Aier Eye Hospital and Hefei Aier Eye Hospital were included in the study. Among them, there were 11 males (11 eyes) and 67 females (67 eyes) with the average age of 55.6±9.6 years. All patients underwent BCVA, diopter, OCT examination and axial length (AL) measurement. The standard logarithmic visual acuity chart was used for BCVA examination, and the visual acuity was converted to logMAR when recorded. Patients were divided into PPV combined with ILM peeling group (ILM peeling group) and PPV combined with ILM inverted group (ILM inverted group) according to the surgical method, with 51 patients (51 eyes) and 27 patients (27 eyes), respectively. The average age (t=－1.170), diopter (t=0.504), AL (t=0.474), logMAR BCVA (t=0.935), and hole diameter (t=－0.334) of the two groups were compared, and there was no statistically significant difference (P＞0.05). Two independent sample t test was used to compare the exposed distance of BCVA and RPE before and after the operation of the two groups of eyes. The χ2 test was used to compare the rates between the two groups.ResultsAt the last follow-up, the logMAR BCVA of the eyes in the ILM inverted group and ILM peeling group were 0.87±0.27 and 1.45±0.39, respectively. Compared with pre-operation, the BCVA of the two groups of eyes were significantly improved, and the difference was statistically significant (t=8.790, 4.640, P＜0.001,＜0.001). The logMAR BCVA of the two groups of eyes was compared with statistical significance (t=6.830, P＜0.001). The exposed RPE distances of the eyes in the ILM inverted group and the inner limiting membrane peeling group were 31.81±23.52 and 681.80±466.61 μm, respectively. the difference in the RPE exposure distance between the two groups was statistically significant (t=7.180, P＜0.001). The holes in the 27 eyes in the ILM inverted group were healed (100%, 27/27); no retinal detachment occurred. Among the 51 eyes in the ILM peeling group, the hole healed in 45 eyes (88.2%, 45/51), and the retina was detached in 6 eyes (11.8%, 6/51). There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of retinal detachment between the two groups of patients (χ2=45.440, P=0.000).ConclusionCompared to ILM peeling, inverted ILM has provided better RPE protection and reduce the rate of retinal redetachment in patients with MHRD.
ObjectiveTo analyze the influencing factors on clinical response to conbercept for diabetic macular edema (DME).MethodsA total of 51 patients (51 eyes) with DME who underwent intravitreal injection of conbercept were included in this retrospective study. The general information (age, sex, body mass index, smoking history, drinking history), blood glucose indicators (duration of diabetes, fasting blood glucose, HbA1c), blood pressure indicators (history of hypertension, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure), lipid indicators [total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), apolipoprotein A (APOA)], biochemical indicators [neutrophil concentration, hemoglobin (HB), serum creatinine (Scr)] were collected. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and macular central macular thickness (CMT) before and after treatment were comparatively analyzed. CMT reduced not less than 20% and BCVA increased by 2 lines as effective standards. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine the factors affecting the efficacy of intravitreal injection of conbercept in patients with DME.ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that diastolic blood pressure, HDL, serum neutrophil concentration, baseline CMT and baseline BCVA were associated with edema regression (P＜0.05); HbA1c was associated with vision improvement (P＜0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that there was a history of smoking (OR=0.122, 95% CI 0.017 − 0.887), low diastolic blood pressure (OR=0.850, 95%CI0.748 − 0.966), low HDL (OR=0.007, 95%CI 0.000 1 − 0.440), thin baseline CMT (OR=0.986, 95%CI0.977 − 0.995) were independent risk factors for failure outcome of edema regression (P＜0.05); long duration of diabetes (OR=1.191, 95%CI 1.011 − 1.404), high APOA (OR=1.007, 95% CI 1.000 − 1.013) were independent risk factors for failure outcome of vision improvement. Age, fasting blood glucose, systolic blood pressure, TC, HB, Scr and other indicators had no effect on the efficacy of edema regression and vision improvement after treatment (P＞0.05).ConclusionsSmoking history, long duration of diabetes, low diastolic blood pressure, low HDL level, high APOA level and thin baseline CMT are independent risk factors for the treatment of DME with intravitreal injection of conbercept.