Objective To investigate the clinical choice on graft size and the type of donor’s hepatectomy in adult living related partial liver transplantation. Methods The literatures in recent years on the donor’s evaluation, the size of liver grafts, the types of donor hepatectomy and safety of donor in adult living related partial liver transplantation were reviewed.Results The size of liver graft is a crucial factor related to the safety of donor and the prognosis of the recipient. GW/ESLW≥30%, GW/BW≥0.8% may be the lowest limits. Left lobe contained middle hepatic vein, extended left lobe with leftside caudle lobe, right lobe or extended right lobe contained middle hepatic vein may be the practical choice.Conclusion It is important to make a reasonable choice of liver graft according to the estimation of GW/ESLW or GW/BW, and the anatomy of liver in adult living related partial liver transplantation.
Objective To analyze the effect of monitoring and modulating the portal vein pressure and blood flow during living donor liver transplantation （LDLT） on preventing small-for-size-syndrome (SFSS). Methods Data of forty-four LDLT recipients between Oct.2007 and Oct.2008 were reviewed. Actual graft-to-recipient weight ratio（GRWR）, portal vein flow and pressure during operation and syndrome of SFSS after operation were recorded. The patients received splenectomy or splenic artery ligation according to actual GRWR, portal vein flow and pressure and WBC. Relationships between patients’ GRWR, portal vein flow, portal vein pressure and occurrence of SFSS were analyzed. Results Six patients received splenectomy and 7 patients received splenic artery ligation to decrease the portal vein flow and pressure during the operation. The portal vein flow and pressure decreased after splenectomy （Plt;0.05）. The portal vein pressure decreased （Plt;0.05） and the portal vein flow had no significant change after splenic artery ligation （P＞0.05）. No SFSS occurred after operation. Conclusion Modulation of portal vein flow and pressure by splenectomy or splenic artery ligation during LDLT operation can decrease the portal vein flow and pressure, and which can prevent the incidence of SFSS.
Objective To investigate the dynamic changes of postoperative liver reserve function and laboratory liver function as well as liver volume regeneration, and their potential relationship with short-term clinical outcomes after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Methods The data of 30 recipients underwent LDLT were prospectively collected. The plasma clearance (K) by indocyanine green (ICG) excretive test, liver function test by laboratory methods, liver volume by CT and shortterm (lt;3 months) complications were analyzed. Results The graft recipient body weight ratio (GRBW) was 0.63%-1.43%. The hepatic volume of the recipients in the operation was (638±103) ml, which was smaller than that day 7, 30, and 90 after operation (Plt;0.001), but the hepatic volume at subsequent time point was not different from that at the former time point (Pgt;0.05). The KICG values of recipients among the day 3 〔(0.177±0.056)/min〕, 7 〔(0.183±0.061)/min〕, 30 〔(0.200±0.049)/min〕, and 90 〔(0.209±0.050)/min〕 after operation gradually increased, which was respectively higher than that of recipients before operation (P=0.006, P=0.002, Plt;0.001, and Plt;0.001). Compared with the baseline KICG 〔(0.228±0.036)/min〕 of the donors, the KICG of recipients showed significant variation on day 3 and 7 after operation (P=0.004 and P=0.015), and the KICG of recipients on day 30 and 90 after operation approached the baseline KICG (P=0.355 and P=0.915). The recipients were divided into good liver function group (n=23) and poor liver function group (n=7) according to total serum bilirubin on day 14 after operation. The KICG significantly dropped compared with the recipients of good liver function group on day 3 after operation (P=0.001). Conclusions The liver volume regenerates dramatically on day 7 after operation for the recipients. The ICG excretivetest shows that volume recovery occurs much more gradually than the recovery of function in the recipients. The ICG excretive test is a more reliable indicator of graft function and subsequent graft outcome early after LDLT.
Objective To research anesthetic management, pathophysiologic variation of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A-ALDLT) and to probe how to improve anesthetic quality of A-ALDLT. Methods The clinical data of 47 donors from Sep. 2005 to Jan. 2007 in West China Hospital were reviewed. Intraoperative vital signs, anesthetic management, perioperative serum levels of HGB， Alb， ALT， AST, TBIL， APTT， PT were measured， and complications were assessed. Results The physical condition of all donors were good before operations and were all in grade Ⅰaccording to ASA. Under general anesthesia of intravenous and inhalation, electrocardiogram, O2 saturation, blood pressure and body temperature were continuously monitored. A radial arterial catheter and a central venous catheter were placed. Blood lavement was utilized intraoperatively in all patients. All donors maintained stable life signs intraoperatively. The average intraoperative blood losses was （603.13±317.00） ml, and donors were transfused with autologous blood 〔(381.25±171.15) ml〕, with only 4 donors required homologous blood transfusion. HR and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) showed no significantly variations intraoperatively (Pgt;0.05). Compared with controlled central venous pressure (CVP) before and right after hepatectomy, CVP increased significantly (P＜0.05) when intubation and abdomen-closing were carried. After hepatectomy and on the first day after operation, HGB and Alb decreased significantly (P＜0.05); ALT, AST and TBIL increased significantly (P＜0.05). Right after hepatectomy, PT increased instantly and significantly (P＜0.05); On the first day after operation, APTT began to increase significantly (P＜0.05). All donors came around completely and were extubated in the liver transplantation intensive care unit on the first day after operation. There were 3 cases (6.38%) of postoperative complication, which were biliary leakage, portal vein thrombosis and serious pleural effusion. Those 3 donors were cured after treatment. Conclusion Inhalation and intravenous general anesthesia of propofol, remifen-tanil and isoflurane can maintain stable life signs and reduce liver injury. Steady anesthesia, sufficient oxygenation and effective blood protection measures, for example, by decreasing CVP to prevent bleeding and by reclaiming autologous blood to avoid transfusing homologous blood, are keys for the safety of the donor and the prevention of complications.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical progress on living related liver transplantation (LRLT). MethodsThe latest progress were reviewed based on recent documents and the experience on LRLT in our department. ResultsLRLT made much progress on evaluation of donor, harvesting the graft liver, donor health assessment and outcomes after living donor liver transplantation, and main factors affecting the survival of liver graft and so on. Conclusion Living related liver transplantation has many unsurpassable advantages, which suits the situation of China and has capacious clinical application.
ObjectiveTo investigate the radiological appearances of postoperative complications after living donor liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma under multi-detector row spiral computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination. MethodsThirty-nine imaging data in 20 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after living donor liver transplantation from January 2008 to June 2010 in the West China Hospital were included and analyzed by two radiologists respectively. The relations between the types of complications and radiological appearances were especially recorded. ResultsAll the cases experienced complications to different extent. Common surgical complications occured in 20 cases, including pertitoneal fluid collection (14 cases), pneumoperitoneum (2 cases), swelling of peritoneum, omentum, and mesentery (1 case), abdominal wall swelling (2 cases), pleural effusion (9 cases), and pericardial fluid collection (2 cases). Hepatic vascular complications involved hepatic artery in 3 cases, portal vein in 5 cases. Biliary complications presented in 7 cases, including anastomotic stenosis of biliary duct (6 cases) and bile leak (1 case). Graft parenchymal complications included intrahepatic lymph retention (11 cases), infarction (3 cases), and infection (2 cases). Intrahepatic recurrence in 5 cases, intraperitoneal metastasis in 3 csses and pulmonary metastasis in 2 cases. ConclusionMDCT and MRI have important diagnostic values for postoperative complications after living donor liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Objective To approach whether the postoperative recovery processes of the living donors and hepaticpatients after right hepatectomy is similar. Methods The clinical data of consecutive cases from 2009 to 2010 in our liver transplantation center was retrospectively analyzed， including 40 cases who donated the right lobe without the middlehepatic vein （living donor liver transpalntation-donor group， abbreviated as LDLT-D group） and 80 hepatic patients forright hepatectomy， in which 40 cases were hepatic patients without cirrhosis （liver disease-noncirrhosis group， abbreviatedas LD-NC group） and 40 cases were hepatic patients with cirrhosis （liver disease-with cirrhosis group， abbreviated asLD-WC group）. Preoperative liver function and general clinical data， intraoperative blood loss and transfusion， postoper-ative liver function， and complications were statistically analyzed in this study. Results The preoperative parameters of three groups were comparable. LDLT-D group experienced more intraoperative bleeding than LD-NC group 〔（765±411） mL vs. （584±242） mL， P=0.008〕， and was similar to LD-WC group 〔（666±224） mL， P=0.136〕. However， the average amount of blood transfusion products was similar among the 3 groups （P=0.108）. The levels of total bilirubin and INR of LDLT-D group were higher than LD-NC group and LD-WC group on the first and third day after operation （P＜0.05）. The levels of ALT and AST of LD-WC group were higher than LDLT-D group and LD-NC group （P＜0.05）. The overall postoperative surgical morbidity incidence of LDLT-D group， LD-NC group， and LD-WC group were 30.0%（12/40）， 27.5% （11/40）， and 37.5% （15/40） respectively， and were not statistically significant （P=0.606）. However， the ClavienⅢcomplication rate of LD-WC group was higher than LDLT-D group and LD-NC group 〔27.5% （11/40） vs. 7.5%（3/40） and 10.0% （4/40）， P=0.024〕. Conclusions Liver function of living donors is injured more seriously during the early postoperative period. The total complication rates after right hepatectomy are similar among the living liver donation and hepatic patients with or without cirrhosis. However， the serious complication rate of cirrhotic liver recipients is higher than living donors and patients without cirrhosis.
Objective To report our experience in living donor liver harvesting of right lobe grafts. MethodsThe data of 76 living donors of right lobe grafts hepatectomy between August 2007 and December 2008 were studied. Before operation, the graft size, remnant liver volume rate, fatty liver, middle hepatic vein type, and the level of portal hypertension of recipient were comprehensive assessed to determine whether harvested middle hepatic vein. The graft was harvested depending on the port vein and hepatic artery ischemia-line. B-ultrasound was used to definite the structure and branch of middle hepatic vein, and intraoperative cholangiography was performed to definite the structure and variation of bile duct. Donor operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, levels of bilirubin, international normalized ratio （INR）, and ALT, and complications after operation were recorded. Results All the operations were successful. The operative time was (8.3±1.3) h, the blood loss was (325±127) ml without blood transfusion in operation. The ALT, INR, and bilirubin recovered on the 12th day. The most common complication in early post-operation was wound infection in 5 cases, 4 cases had cholestasis, 4 cases occurred cross-section bile leakage, and 11 cases occurred varying degrees of delayed gastric emptying in 4～7 d after operation, who were all alleviated by corresponding treatments. The hospital stay was 9～21 d (median: 14 d) after operation. Conclusion Preoperative evaluation of the hepatic anatomy and precise surgical procedure are crucial, which will help the development of graft harvesting and rehabilitation of donor.
【Abstract】ObjectiveTo study the advances in use of imaging in the evaluation of living donor liver. Methods The literatures in recent years on the use of imaging in evaluation of living donor liver were reviewed. ResultsPreoperative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the donor allowed accurate determination of liver volume and rough determination of macrovesicular hepatic steatosis of the liver. CT angiography could assess the anatomy of hepatic artery, portal vein and hepatic veins. Intraoperative cholangiography allowed detection of the anatomy of the biliary tree. ConclusionImaging techniques are widely used in the evaluation of liver volume, vasculature and biliary system in the living donor liver.