Objective To compare the effectiveness between locking compression plate (LCP) and locked intramedullary nail (IMN) for humeral shaft fractures of types B and C. Methods Between January 2010 and January 2012, 46 patients with humeral shaft fractures of types B and C were treated, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. LCP was used for internal fixation in 22 cases (LCP group), and IMN in 24 cases (IMN group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury causes, the side of fracture, the site of fracture, the type of fracture, associated injury, and time from injury to operation between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The regular clinical examination and evaluation of radiography were done. Shoulder function was evaluated by Neer grading system and elbow function was evaluated by Mayo elbow performance score after operation. Results The operation time and intraoperative blood loss in IMN group were significantly lower than those in LCP group (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in hospitalization time between 2 groups (t=0.344, P=0.733). All patients were followed up 16.8 months on average (range, 12-24 months). At 6 months after operation, bone nonunion occurred in 1 patient of LCP group and in 2 patients of IMN group; the bone healing rate was 95.5% (21/22) in LCP group and 91.7% (22/24) in IMN group, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.000, P=1.000). Except for nonunion patients, the bone healing time was (11.77 ± 0.75) weeks in LCP group and (11.38 ± 0.82) weeks in IMN group, showing no significant difference (t=1.705, P=0.095). Between LCP and IMN groups, significant differences were found in radial nerve injury (4 cases vs. 0 case) and impingement of shoulder (0 case vs. 6 cases) (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference in superficial infection (1 case vs. 0 case) and iatrogenic fracture (1 case vs. 2 cases) (P gt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in shoulder function and elbow function at 1 year after operation between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion LCP fixation and IMN fixation for humeral shaft fractures of types B and C can achieved satisfactory results. More attention should be paid to avoiding radial nerve injury by fixation of LCP; nail tail should be buried deeply into the cortex of the greater tuberosity and rotator cuff should be protected to decrease the rate of impingement of shoulder by fixation of IMN.
Objective To evaluate the treatment results of LCP and locked intramedullary nailing for tibial diaphysis fractures.MethodsFrom October 2003 to April 2006, 55 patients with tibial diaphysis fractures ( 58 fractures) were treated. Of them there were 39 males and 16 females with an average of 39 years years ( 14 to 62 years). The fractures were on the left side in 27 patients and on the right side in 31 patients (3 patients had bilateral involvement). Thirtyfour fractures were treated by intramedullary nailing (intramedullary nailing group) and 24 fractures by LCP fixation (LCP group). The average disease course was 3 days (intramedullary nailing group) and 3.1 days(LCP group). The operation time, the range of motion of knee and ankle joints, fracturehealing time, and complications were evaluated. Results The patients were followed up 8-26 months(13 months on average). The operation time was 84.0±9.2 min (intramedullary nailing group) and 69.0±8.4 min (LCPgroup)； the average cost in hospital was￥19 297.78 in the intramedullary nailing group and ￥14 116.55 in the LCP group respectively, showing significant differences(P＜0.05). The flexion and extension of knee joint was 139.0±3.7° and 4.0±0.7° in intramedullary nailing group and 149.0±4.2° and 0±0.4° in LCP group, showing no significant difference(Pgt;0.05). The doral flexion and plantar flexion of ankle joint were 13.0±1.7° and 41.0±2.6° in intramedullary nailing group, and 10.0±1.4° and 44.0±2.3° in LCP group, showing nosignificant differences(Pgt;0.05). The mean healing time was 3.3 months in intramedullary nailing group, and 3.1 months in LCP group. Length discrepancy occurred in 1 case (2.5 cm), delayed union in 1 case and nailing endtrouble in 3 cases in intramedullary nailing group; moreover rotation deformityoccurred 1 case and anterior knee pain occurred in 6 cases(17.1%). One angulation and open fracture developed osteomyelitis in 1 case 1 week postoperatively and angulation deformity occurred in 1 case of distalthird tibial fractures in LCP group. Conclusion LCP and locked intramedullary nailing can achieve satisfactory results in treating tibial diaphysis fracture LCP has advantages in less complication, operation time and cost in hospital.
Objective To investigate an effect of the Fixion expandable intramedullary nail on treatment of the closed fracture of the tibial shaft, and to compare the Fixion nail with the traditional locked intramendullary nail.Methods From September 1, 2005 to August 31, 2006, 79 patients (53 men, 26 women; aged 17-57 years, 37 years on average) with the closed fracture of the tibial shaft were treated with the Fixion expandable intramedullary nail, and the effect of the nail was evaluated. According to the AO classification, the patients were typed as Type 42A or Type 42B. And the patients were divided into the following two groups: the expandable intramedullary nail group (n=31) and the traditional locked intramedullary nail group (n=48). Of the 31 patents in the first group, 24 were of Type 42A and 7 were of Type 42B; of the 48 patients in the second group, 37 were of Type 42A and 11 were of Type 42B. All the patients were followed up after operation. Observation was made on the time of the bony callus development and the time of the clinical healing of the bone,and on whether there was the bone malunion, late healing, disunion or infection. The limb function was also evaluated.Results The follow-up of all the 79 patients for 4-15 months averaged 10.3 months revealed that in the expandable intramedullary nail group, the average operating time was 35 minutes (range, 20-60 minutes), with no requirement of blood transfusion. The X-ray examination showed that the bony callus developed as early as 4 weeks after operation. The clinical healing time of the bone was 3-8 months, averaged 5 months. All the patients in this group had the healing by first intention. Evaluatedby the Johner-Wruhs method, an excellent result was found in 28 patients, goodin 3 patients, and poor in none of the patients, with an excellent/good rate of100%. In the traditional locked intramedullary nail group, the average operating time was 75 minutes (range, 45-110 minutes), with no requirement of blood transfusion. The X-ray examination showed that the bony callus developed as early as 4.5 weeks after operation. The clinical healing time was 3-12 months, averaged 5.8 months. In this group, 46 patients had the healing by first intention and 2 patients had the healing by second intention. Evaluated by the JohnerWruhs method,an excellent result was found in 35 patients, good in 11 patients, and fair in 2 patients, with an excellent/good rate of 95.8%.Conclusion The expandable intramedullary nail treatment has advantages of less invasion, simpler manipulation, earlier weightbearing of the bone, quicker healing ofthe bone fracture, and fewer complications. This kind of treatment is worth popularizing in the medical practice if the indication is strictly controlled.