ObjectiveTo compare clinical efficacy of 4 kinds of surgical treatment for high transsphincter fistula. MethodsThe clinical data of 116 patients with high transsphincter fistula in Jiangsu Province Hospital of TCM from January 2012 to December 2014 were analyzed retrospectively.These patients were divided into 4 groups according to surgical treatments,including cut seton group (n=30),loose seton group (n=34),ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract group (LIFT,n=41),mucosa advancement flap group (MAF,n=11).The length of stay,incision healing time,postoperative pain score on the second day,Wexner score when healed,postoperative complications,curative status,and recurrence were observed. Results① The length of stay in the loose seton group was significantly longer than that in the LIFT group (P<0.01),cut seton group (P<0.05) or MAF group (P<0.05),but which had no differences among the other groups (P>0.05).② The incision healing time in the loose seton group was significantly longer than that in the LIFT group (P<0.01) or the MAF group (P<0.05),but which had no differences among the other groups (P>0.05).③ The postoperative pain score on the second day in the cut seton group was significantly higher than that in the other three groups (P<0.01),which in the MAF group was lower than that in the LIFT group (P<0.05),but which had no difference between the other groups (P>0.05).④The Wexner score when healed in the cut seton group was significantly higher than that in the other three groups (P<0.01),bwt which had no differences among the other groups (P>0.05).⑤ The rate of postoperative complica-tion in the LIFT group was significantly higher than that in the loose seton group (P<0.05),but which had no differences among the other groups (P>0.05).⑥ The curative rate and recurrence rate had no statistically differences among the 4 groups (P>0.05). ConclusionsCurative rate and recurrence rate in loose seton,LIFT,and MAF group are similar with cut seton group,meanwhile they could protect anal function better and relieve pain.The length of stay and the incision healing time are longer in the loose seton group.The postoperative complications in LIFT group is increased as compared with loose seton group.The postoperative pain of MAF group is slighter than that in LIFT group.Comprehensive evaluation,MAF has more advantages,but the technique is more complex.The decision should be made individually according to patients and surgeons.