west china medical publishers
Author
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Author "MENG Xianguo" 2 results
  • LONG-TERM EFFECT OF EXCESSIVE LENGTH OF BONE GRAFT VIA ANTERIOR CERVICAL APPROACH ON CERVICAL CURVATURE AND AXIAL SYMPTOM

    Objective To evaluate the long-term effect of excessive length of bone graft via anterior cervical approach and over distraction of intervertebral space on cervical curvature and postoperative neck axial symptom (AS). Methods FromJune 2001 to June 2004, 30 patients with nerve root cervical spondylosis at the C5,6 level underwent anterior cervicaldecompression, autogenous il iac bone graft and internal fixation with titanium plate. There were 14 males and 16 females aged 32-73 years old (average 54.7 years old), and the course of disease was 1-31 months (average 7 months). No instabil ity of cervical vertebrae was noted on the cervical dynamic position x-ray films. Intervertebral height was measured immediately after operation, and accordingly the patients were divided into two groups: the over distraction group (n=11), in which the length of bone graft was excessive, the intervertebral space was over distracted, and the intervertebral height was increased by more than 3 mm compared with the preoperative value; the proper distraction group (n=19), in which the length of bone graft was proper, no over distraction of the intervertebral space occured, and the intervertebral height was increased by less than 3 mm compared with the preoperative value. Regular X-ray exams were performed 1 week and 3, 24, and 48 months after operation to analyze bone fusion condition of the grafted bone, changes of the intervertebral height of the fused segments, and variation of physiological curvature of the cervical vertebra. The postoperative neck AS was evaluated according to the the neck AS evaluation criteria set by ZENG Yan and co-workers. Results All patients were followed up for 48-66 months (average 54.5 months). Cl inical symptoms were el iminated in all cases. No compl ications occurred in the proper distraction group; 1 patient of the over distraction group had ostoperative nerve root paralysis at C5 level, and recovered 3 months after proactive treatment. Bone fusion was achieved in all patients 3-6 months after operation, except for 1 case in the proper distraction group suffering from non-fusion 12 months after operation. There was no occurrence of loosening or breakage of steel plate and screw, and no displacement of the grafted bone. At 48 months after operation, the intervertebral height of the proper distraction group and the over distraction group was increased by (1.9 ± 1.8) mm and (3.5 ± 2.7) mm, respectively, when compared with the preoperativevalue (P gt; 0.05). The physiological curvature of the operated cervical segment was well maintained. The curvature of the proper distraction group and the over distraction group at the final follow-up visit was increased by (2.17 ± 1.83)° and (3.32 ± 2.71)°, respectively, when compared with the preoperative value (P gt; 0.05). The physiological curvature of the whole cervical vertebra at the final follow-up visit was increased by (4.57 ± 3.71)° in the proper distraction group and decreased by (2.43 ± 2.13)° in the over distraction group, when compared with the preoperative value (P lt; 0.05). The incidence rate of postoperative neck S at 48 months after operation was 15.79% in the proper distraction group (11 cases excellent, 5 cases good, 3 cases fair) and 54.55% in the over distraction group (3 cases excellent, 2 cases good, 5 cases fair, 1 case poor), showing a significant difference between two groups (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Excessive length of bone graft via anterior cervical approach and over distraction of intervertebral space are bad for maintaining the physiological curvature of the whole cervical vertebra, and increase the incidence of postoperative neck AS. Selection of bone graft at the proper height is essential in anterior cervical operation.

    Release date:2016-09-01 09:07 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • A CONTRASTIVE STUDY OF TREATING SINGLE LEVEL RECURRENT LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION

    To assess long-term outcomes of reoperation for recurrent lumbar disc herniation, and to compare results of different methods. Methods There were 95 patients who had reoperation for recurrent lumbar discherniation between February 1998 to February 2003, among whom a total of 89 (93.7%) were followed up and their primary data were reviewed. There were 76 patients, with the mean age of 42 years (range from 23 to 61), who met the inclusion criteria and were included. Among them, there were 55 males and 21 females. All patients had the history of more than one sciatic nervepain. The mean recurrent time was 69 months(range from 8 to 130 months). There were 48 patients in L4,5 and 28 patients in L5, S1, of whom we chose 30 to undergo larger vertebral plate discectomy (or two-side fenestration) and nucleus pulpose discectomy (group A), 24 to undergo the whole vertebral discectomy (group B) and 22 to undergo the whole vertebral discectomy and 360degrees intervertebral fusion(group C). The patients’ cl inical results in the three groups were compared, and the cl inical curative effects were evaluated by using cl inical functional assessment standard. Results Cl inical outcomes were excellent or good in 80.3% of the patients, including 80.0% of group A, 79.2% of group B and 81.8% of group C. There was no significant difference in each group (P gt; 0.05). These three groups were not different in age, pain-free interval and follow-up duration (P gt; 0.05). The mean intraoperative blood losses in the three groups were (110.7 ± 98.8), (278.7 ± 256.3), (350.7 ± 206.1) mL, respectively. The mean surgery time were (65.9 ± 22.8), (111.6 ± 24.3), (127.3 ± 26.7) minutes, respectively, and the mean hospital ization time were (6.7 ± 1.4), (10.2 ± 1.8), (12.2 ± 2.3) days, respectively. Group A was significantly less than group B or C (P lt; 0.05) and there was no significant difference between group B and C. All the patients were followed up for 36 to 96 months with an average of 86 months, and with (87.6 ± 27.0), (84.5 ± 19.8), (83.6 ± 13.5) months of group A, B and C, respectively. At the endof the follow-up, there were more cases of spinal instabil ity at the same level in group B (19 patients) than in group A (1 patient) or group C (no patient) in X-ray, and the difference was significant (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Reoperation for recurrent lumbar disc herniation is effective. Larger vertebral plate discectomy or tow-side fenestration is recommended for managing recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

    Release date:2016-09-01 09:12 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content