west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "Maisonneuve fracture" 2 results
  • ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL EFFECT IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF Maisonneuve FRACTURE

    ObjectiveTo investigate the operative method and short-term effectiveness in the surgical treatment of Maisonneuve fracture. MethodsBetween January 2010 and February 2013, 23 patients with Maisonneuve fracture were treated. There were 14 males and 9 females with an average age of 40.3 years (range, 30-68 years). The causes of injuries were falling injury in 11 patients, sports related injury in 5 patients, traffic accident injury in 4 patients, and falling injury from height in 3 patients. The interval between injury and operation was 7-10 days (mean, 8.5 days). All of fractures were closed. Three patients had combined injury of deltoid ligament. The surgical procedures included surgical reduction and fixation of medial malleolus fracture and posterior malleolus fracture, repair of the deltoid ligament with ground anchor suture, and fixation of the disrupted distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. ResultsAll incisions achieved primary healing, no postoperative complications such as infection occurred. Twenty-one patients were followed up 24-36 months (mean, 26.5 months). No patients complained of pain, tenderness, and obvious swelling of the ankle. At 3-6 months (mean, 4.6 months) after operation, X-ray films showed bony union of fractures and normal mortises in 21 patients. And no traumatic arthritis was observed with reliable fixation. The range of motion of ankle dorsi flexion and plantar flexion was 30-40° (mean, 34.5°). Baird-Jackson ankle functional score was 85-100 (mean, 94); 16 cases were rated as excellent, 4 as good, and 1 as fair with an excellent and good rate of 95.2%. ConclusionSurgical treatments of Maisonneuve fracture include surgical reduction and fixation of the medial malleolus and posterior malleolus, repair of the deltoid ligament and fixation of the disrupted distal tibiofibular syndesmosis, and good effectiveness can be achieved.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Comparison of bioabsorbable screw and metallic screw for Maisonneuve fracture

    ObjectiveTo compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of bioabsorbable screw and metallic screw for Maisonneuve fracture.MethodsThe clinical data of 68 patients of Maisonneuve fracture treated with open reduction and internal fixation between October 2012 and October 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Metallic screw fixation was used in 37 cases (group A) and absorbable screw fixation was used in 31 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in age, gender, weight, operated side, cause of injury, time from injury to operation, and complications between the two groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, the tibiafibular clear space (TFCS), tibiafibular overlap (TFO), medial clear space (MCS), and syndesmotic malreduction rate were recorded. And the dorsiflexion and plantar-flexion range of motion, pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, ankle and hind foot score of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), and Olerud-Molander (OM) score were recorded.ResultsAll patients were followed up 25-43 months, with an average of 32.3 months. There was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups (t=1.229, P=0.282). All the fractures healed, and there was no significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups (t=1.367, P=0.413). At last follow-up, the syndesmotic malreduction rate of group A was 16.2% (6/37), showing no significant difference when compared with group B [6.2% (2/31)] (χ2=1.549, P=0.213). There were 3 complications in group A, 1 was superficial wound infection, 1 was local heterotopic ossification due to failure to remove the screws in time, 1 was local heterotopic ossification of the screws; and there were 2 complications in group B, 1 was rejection and 1 was local heterotopic ossification of the screws. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (χ2=0.068, P=0.794). There was no significant difference in TFCS, MCS, TFO, ankle dorsiflexion and plantar-flexion range of motion, AOFAS score, OM score, and VAS score between the two groups at last follow-up (P>0.05).ConclusionCompared with metallic screw, absorbable screws provide adequate fixation and functional recovery with avoiding screw removal and lower syndesmotic malreduction.

    Release date:2020-04-29 03:03 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content