机械通气领域目前有几大争论, 涉及在机械通气中基本的也是十分重要的问题, 复习和深入探讨这些问题, 对了解机械通气近年的研究进展, 指导机械通气的临床实践很有意义。
Objective To study the sedative effects and safety of dexmedetomidine and midazolamfor acute exacerbate of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( AECOPD) underwentmechanical ventilation.Methods 68 AECOPD patients underwentmechanical ventilation were enrolled and randomly divided into adexmedetomidine group ( n =34) and a midazolam group ( n = 34) by acute physiology and chronic healthevaluation Ⅱ ( APACHEⅡ) score. The patients in the dexmedetomidine group were given a loading dose( 1 μg/kg) and then maintained with 0. 2-0. 8 mg·kg- 1 ·h- 1 . The patients in the midazolam group weregiven a loading dose ( 0. 05 mg/kg) and then maintained with 0. 06-0. 2 mg· kg- 1 · h- 1 . Sedation levelwas assessed by Ramsay score and maintained a Ramsay score of 3-4. The sedation onset time, disablesedatives wake time, duration of mechanical ventilation, extubation success rate, ICU length of stay, and 28days mortality after admission to the ICU were compared between two groups. And calmer respiratorydepression, circulatory and delirium adverse reactions incidence were also compared. Results Thedifferences in patients’age, gender, and APACHEⅡ score between two groups were not significant ( P gt;0. 05) . Compared with the midazolam group, the dexmedetomidine group had more rapid onset of sedation[ ( 49. 80 ±8. 20) s vs. ( 107. 55 ±19. 65) s, P lt;0. 01] , shorter wake-up time [ ( 18. 90 ±2. 30) min vs. ( 40. 82 ±19. 85) min, P lt;0. 01] , shorter duration of mechanical ventilation [ ( 4. 9 ±1. 6) d vs. ( 7. 8 ±2. 5) d,P lt;0. 01] , higher successful extubation rate ( 79. 41% vs. 58. 82% , P lt;0. 01) , and shorter ICUlength of stay[ ( 6. 5 ±2. 5) d vs. ( 9. 6 ±3. 4) d, P lt;0. 05] . Dexmedetomidine had lower respiratory depression rate, littleeffects on hemodynamics, lower occurrence and short duration of delirium. Conclusion It is highlyrecommended that dexmedetomidine be used for sedation in AECOPD patients with mechanical ventilation.
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of lung ultrasound-guided pulmonary rehabilitation training in ICU patients on mechanical ventilation.MethodsPatients on mechanical ventilation admitted to the ICU of a tertiary A-level hospital in Hefei city from July 2022 to December 2023 were selected and randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group using a random number table method. The control group received conventional pulmonary rehabilitation training, while the experimental group underwent lung ultrasound-guided pulmonary rehabilitation training. The differences in lung ultrasound scores, oxygenation index, diaphragm function, weaning success rate, and mechanical ventilation time were compared between the two groups on the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 7th days of intervention.ResultsThe study was completed with 48 cases in the experimental group and 46 cases in the control group. Repeated measures ANOVA showed statistically significant intergroup effects, time effects, and interaction effects on lung ultrasound scores, oxygenation index, diaphragm mobility, and diaphragm thickness variability rate (P<0.05). The weaning success rate was higher in the experimental group than in the control group, and the mechanical ventilation time was shorter, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05).ConclusionsThe lung ultrasound-guided pulmonary rehabilitation training program can effectively improve the pulmonary status, oxygenation, and diaphragm function of ICU patients on mechanical ventilation, increase the success rate of weaning, shorten the mechanical ventilation time, and accelerate patient recovery.