ObjectiveTo compare the short-term effectiveness of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee so as to provide a reference for clinical selection of appropriate treatment. MethodsBetween January 2010 and June 2011, 28 cases of medial compartment OA of the knee underwent UKA in 16 cases (UKA group) and HTO in 12 cases (HTO group). Biomet Oxford phase Ⅲ unicompartmental knee prosthesis was used in UKA group, and closing wedge osteotomy in HTO group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, course of disease, side, body mass index, articular cartilage degeneration classification, preoperative knee range of motion (ROM), Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity score, and femorotibial angle (FTA) between the 2 groups (P>0.05). The patients of UKA group began weight-bearing walking with walking aids within 48 hours after operation, and the patients of HTO group began weight-bearing walking with walking aids at 6 weeks after operation, and gradually began full weight-bearing walking at 8-12 weeks. ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between 2 groups (t=0.406, P=0.688; t=-1.552, P=0.133). All incision healed primarily in both groups. No complications occurred in 2 groups. All patients were followed up 3.5 years on average (range, 3.0-4.5 years) in UKA group and 3.6 years on average (range, 3-4 years) in HTO group. There were significant differences in Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity score, and FTA in the 2 groups between before and after operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in knee ROM (P>0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in all above indexes between 2 groups (P>0.05). The postoperative X-ray showed that all force lines of the lower limbs were corrected, and the prosthesis and internal fixation were fixed reliably. During follow-up, Kellgren-Lawrence Ⅱ degeneration of the lateral compartment was observed in 1 case of 2 groups respectively; Kellgren-Lawrence Ⅱ degeneration of the patellofemoral joint was observed in 1 case of the HTO group, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (χ2=0.778, P=0.378). ConclusionBoth UKA and HTO have good short-term effectiveness for treating unicompartmental OA; however, the long-term effectiveness need further study and follow-up.
ObjectiveTo study the results of high tibia osteotomy (HTO) combined with posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction for osteoarthritis (OA) of the medial compartment with PCL injury. MethodsBetween March 2008 and June 2014, 11 patients with OA of the medial compartment and PCL injury underwent HTO combined with PCL reconstruction. There were 5 males and 6 females, aged 43-55 years (mean, 50.3 years). All patients had a trauma history, and the duration of injury was 3-5 years (mean, 3.7 years). At preoperation, Hospital for special surgery (HSS) score was 54.73±8.60, Lysholm score was 56.91±4.51, KT-1000 test was (5.71±1.13) mm, and knee range of motion (ROM) was (125.21±4.77)°. The preoperative femoral tibia angle (FTA) and posterior slope angle (PSA) of the tibia plateau were (184.82±2.40)° and (7.18±1.17)° on the X-ray film. ResultsIncisional fat liquefaction occurred in 1 case, and wound healed after dressing change; primary healing of wound was obtained in the other cases. All 11 cases were followed up 12-28 months (mean, 17 months). Bone union was observed at osteotomy site within 6 months, without delayed union or nonunion. After operation, genu varus deformity was corrected with different degrees; the stability of knees was improved in all patients; and the pain of medial knee was released significantly. At 12 months after operation, the FTA was significantly reduced to (176.64±1.96)°; at last follow-up, the HSS score was significantly increased to 88.27±4.76, KT- 1000 test was significantly reduced to (3.18±0.87) mm, and Lyholm score was significantly increased to 86.45±2.34, all showing significant differences when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05). At last follow-up, the knee ROM was (124.63±2.98)° and the PSA was (7.91±1.30)°, showing no significant difference when compared with preoperative ones (P>0.05). ConclusionThe PSA will not be changed when a combination of HTO and PCL reconstruction is used to treat OA of the medial compartment with PCL injury if the right osteotomy site and reasonable bone graft are selected. The short-term effectiveness is good because of good recovery of the lower extremity force line and knee stability, but the long-term effectiveness remains to be further followed up.