Objective To explore the medical insurance quota payment of dialysis treatment for outpatients with end-stage renal disease in Chengdu from following aspects, evaluation indexes and reasonable amount, so as to provide scientific basis for the payment of single disease. Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted to collect the cost information of patients, and to formulate the assignment of evaluation indexes according to the therapeutic principles and statistical results; Delphi method was adopted to determine the assignment and the standard of quota payment. Results A total of 17 dialysis organizations approved by Chengdu municipal medical insurance were involved in this study. Of 700 questionnaires distributed, 686 were retrieved. After excluding 26 questionnaires for incomplete filling and incorrect treatment information, a total of 660 questionnaires were included actually, accounted for 94.28% of all informants. The results of survey showed that, the hemodialysis treatment rate accounted for 84% (555/660) of all informants, while the peritoneal dialysis treatment rate accounted for 16% (105/660). By assessing the project assignment of outpatient dialysis treatment, the minimum annual payment of hemodialysis was RMB 118 242.75 yuan, while that of peritoneal dialysis was RMB 96 498.00 yuan. Conclusion The quota payment of outpatient dialysis shows b evidence after adopting the treatment project assignment. The grading quota payment of outpatient dialysis enables the medical insurance fund to be more reasonably used.
Objective To identify the chief factors influencing the hospitalization expenses in fracture patients with health insurance so as to provide information for the control of irrational increase in medical expenses and reform in the mode of medical insurance payment. Methods A total of 113 fracture patients with medical insurance in a hospital of a certain city from September 2006 to April 2007 were included and statistical analysis was performed by using multinomial linear regression analysis. Results The major factors influencing the hospitalization expenses in fracture patients with health insurance included the proportion of material fees and drug fees, length of stay, performance of operations and blood transfusion and etc. Conclusion Lowering the proportion of material fees and drug fees reasonably, reducing the length of hospital stay and avoiding operations and blood transfusion were the key to the control of hospitalization expenses for fracture. It is imperative to speed up and deepen the reform in medical insurance system, formulate scientific diagnostic and treatment routines and clinical pathways as well as expense standards, and try out the payment on certain single disease such as fracture.
ObjectiveTo classify and analyze medical audit chargeback of a hospital and to propose management strategies. MethodsWe classified the project audit chargeback of a grade-three class-A comprehensive hospital in Chengdu from June to December 2013, and analyzed the underlying causes of the chargeback. ResultsThe total chargeback of the hospital from June to December 2013 was more than 30 000 items and the general amount involved was about 3 million yuan. The project number of recurring charges, excessive charges, unreasonable charges, anchored fees, inconsistent charges with doctors' advices, non-indications, disproportionate fees and charges over restriction accounts occupied respectively 42.99%, 39.71%, 9.15%, 5.73%, 0.35%, 0.17%, 1.44% and 0.46%; and the amount of money involved for those projects occupied respectively 8.84%, 52.55%, 14.44%, 10.70%, 2.54%, 1.15%, 8.91% and 0.88%. ConclusionThe reasons for project audit chargeback are complicated. By strengthening information technology, management of price and building negotiation mechanism with Medical Insurance and Pricing Management Institutes, we can reduce the amount of chargeback, protect the right of patients and enhance the efficient use of the health insurance fund, so that the hospital, medical insurance and patients can all get benefits.
This paper used the application of health technology assessment (HTA) in medical insurance directory adjustment as an example, introduced NICE’s HTA in UK from seeking legislative support for HTA, established the system of HTA, improved the process of HTA and increasing awareness of using HTA among decision-maker, and provided suggestions for the development and advancement of HTA in China.
This article is based on the work practice of Medical-lnsurance-Medicine Linkage carried out by the Nanping First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University under the reform of payment based on diagnosis related group (DRG). It outlines the connotation and extension of Medical-lnsurance-Medicine Linkage in the hospital, including concept definition, organizational structure, the relationship between DRG payment and Medical-lnsurance-Medicine Linkage, and summarizes the specific measures and positive results of the Medical-lnsurance-Medicine Linkage work mechanism from four aspects: medical quality management, medical insurance management, medical drugs/consumables management, and performance evaluation. These experiences are of great significance for improving the quality and efficiency of medical care, actively responding to the reform of medical insurance payment methods, enhancing the level of medical services in public hospitals, and achieving a win situation among the medical insurance management departments, hospitals, and patients.
Objective To explore the impact of diagnosis-related group (DRG) payment method reform under total amount control on neurology and neurosurgery departments. Methods The DRG grouping data of the Department of Neurology and the Department of Neurosurgery of Panzhihua Central Hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 were collected, and the mature DRG evaluation indexes in China were selected. Using the interrupt time series analysis method, the DRG-related indexes of the two departments before and after the introduction of the performance appraisal plan in July 2019 were compared, to evaluate the intervention effects on the two departments. Results Both neurology and neurosurgery departments showed a slow downward trend in the overall medical service capacity under the DRG payment. The efficiency of medical services showed a slow upward trend and the consumption of medical expenses showed a slow downward trend in the Department of Neurology, while the efficiency of medical services showed a slow downward trend and the consumption of medical expenses showed a slow upward trend in the Department of Neurosurgery. According to the results of interrupt time series analysis, in the Department of Neurosurgery, the total weight showed a significant downward trend before intervention (β1=−5.526, P=0.003), and the downward trend became sluggish after intervention, with a statistically significant slope difference before and after intervention (β3=4.546, P=0.047); the case-mix index showed a downward trend before intervention (β1=−0.050, P<0.001), and no obvious trend after intervention, with a statistically significant slope difference before and after intervention (β3=0.052, P=0.001); the cost consumption index showed no obvious downward trend before intervention (β1=−0.006, P=0.258), and an upward trend after intervention, with a statistically significant slope difference before and after intervention (β3=0.027, P=0.032). The impact of this assessment plan on the Department of Neurology was not statistically significant (P>0.05), needing further observation. Conclusions The reform of DRG payment method under total amount control has different effects on the evaluation indicators of clinical departments of different natures. It is recommended to implement classified management and assessment for clinical departments of different natures.