Objective To observe the differentiation effect of rabbit amnion-derived stem cells (ADSC) induced into neural cells.Methods ADSC of New Zealand female rabbits were isolated and cultured. Its mRNA level of Fibronectin, Nestin and Vimentin were detected by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The selfreplication ability of ADSC was confirmed by monoclonal formation experiments. These ADSC were further induced into neural cells in vitro. Five days after induced differentiation, the expression of -tubulin and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were detected by immunofluorescent staining. Results ADSC were separated from amnion tissue gradually after 24 hours. There were polygonal cells gathered around the amnion tissue at 72 hours, and were distributed compactly around the amnion at 120 hours. The morphology of cleavage daughter cells was basically the same as parent cells. ADSC has the ability of self-replication. The Nestin, Vimentin, Fibronectin mRNA expressions in ADSC were 15.79, 1.91, 7.65 times those in spleen cells. The differences were statistically significant(Z=-5.243, -3.972, -2.524; P＜0.05). The beta;-tubulin expression was found in cytoplasm of most cells. The GFAP expression was found in cytoplasm in some cells. Conclusions ADSC has self-replication ability. It can be induced into neurons and neuroglial cells under the right conditions.
Primary economic evaluations are needed in the case that the systematic review of existing economic evidence is not capable of informing economic profiles of marketed medicines. Following the first section of this programs, we presented the principles of designing a study, measuring costs and outcomes, and performing sensitivity analyses. Generally, four designs of economic evaluations are available to perform economic evaluations, each of which has specific strengths and weaknesses. Valuation of outcomes and costs may differ in methods, mainly based on the requirements and applicability of study. The possible factors leading to variation of results should be analyzed using analytic methods with different techniques.
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) provides a reliable evidence decision-making model for the medical field. The concepts and methods of EBM are gradually extended to other disciplines. At present, the paradigm of evidence-based science (EBS) is formally proposed, which is not only based on a methodological cooperation between different disciplines, but also a deeper potential driving force in optimizing the operation process of knowledge. The advantages of EBS helps promote its extension to other disciplines through standardization concepts and systematic methods, through which the common theories and supporting organization of EBS are formed. Under the guideline of EBS, the evidence-based concepts and methods will play a supportive role in scientific development.
Rapid, living evidence-based points, as a new model promoting the rapid translation of evidence, aim to integrate the current best evidence, clinical status, public/patient preferences and values, and provide concise and practical guidance rapidly to important questions concerned in clinical medicine and public health. This paper introduces the methodological framework for the development of "Rapid, Living Evidence-Based Points" from 4 aspects: initiation and planning, evidence search and review, development, update, publication and dissemination of evidence-based points, in order to provide a reference for domestic scholars in developing rapid, living evidence-based points.