Objective To investigate the effectiveness of surgical treatment for single-level degenerative lumbar instabil ity (DLI) by comparing traditional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with minimally invasive TLIF. Methods Between March 2007 and May 2009，87 patients with single-level DLI were treated by traditional open TLIF (group A, n=45) and by minimally invasive TLIF (group B, n=42), respectively. There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, segment level, combined diseases of lumbar spine, or the proportion of uni- and bilateral symptom between 2groups (P gt; 0.05). The indexes of surgical trauma，systemic inflammatory response, cl inical outcomes, and aravertebral muscle injury were compared between 2 groups. Results Operation was performed successfully in all patients. The patients were followed up 2.9 years on average in group A and 2.8 years on average in group B. The incision, blood loss, and postoperative drainage in group B were significantly less than those in group A (P lt; 0.05), but the operation time in group B was significantly longer than that in group A (P lt; 0.05). There were significant differences (P lt; 0.05) in C-reactive protein, leucocyte count, and creatine kinase MM between 2 groups at 24 hours postoperatively as well as in C-reactive protein at 6 days postoperatively; group B was superior to group A. At last follow-up, the Oswestry disabil ity index (ODI) and visual analogue score (VAS) were significantly improved when compared with the preoperative scores in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). There were significant differences in ODI and back pain VAS score (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference in leg pain VAS score (P gt; 0.05) between 2 groups. At last follow-up, no low back pain occurred in 8 and 18 cases, mild in 25 and 18 cases, moderate in 9 and 6 cases, and severe in 3 and 0 cases in groups A and B, respectively, showing that low back pain was significantly l ighter in group B than in group A (Z= —2.574, P=0.010). At last follow-up, the atrophy ratio of multifidus muscle was 37% ± 13% in group A and was 15% ± 7% in group B, showing significant difference (t=12.674, P=0.000). The multifidus muscle atrophy was rated as grade I in 18 and 44 sides, as grade II in 42 and 32 sides, and as grade III in 30 and 8 sides in groups A and B, respectively, showing significant difference (Z= — 4.947, P=0.000). Conclusion Both traditional open TLIF and minimally invasive TLIF are the effective treatments for single-level DLI. Minimally invasive TLIF has less surgical trauma, sl ighter postoperative systemic inflammatory response, less paravertebral muscle injury, and lower incidence of postoperative back pain, but it has longer operation time.
Objective To compare the effectiveness between minimally invasive cannulated screw and open reduction and plate fixation in treatment of humeral greater tuberosity fracture by a prospective case-control study. Methods Between January 2008 and January 2011, 49 cases of humeral greater tuberosity fractures were treated with minimally invasive cannulated screw in 25 cases (trial group), and with open reduction and plate fixation in 24 cases (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury cause, disease duration, fracture displacement, injury side, and complications between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The length of incision, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospitalization days were recorded. According to Neer grading system, the effectiveness was evaluated; fracture healing was observed by X-ray films. Results The trial group had smaller incision, shorter operation time, less blood loss, and shorter hospitalization days than the control group, showing significant differences (P lt; 0.01). Superficial infection occurred in 2 cases of the control group, and were cured after symptomatic treatment; primary healing of incision was obtained in the others of 2 groups. All patients were followed up 1-4 years (mean, 2.3 years). The fracture healing time was (7.0 ± 2.3) weeks in the trial group, and was (7.8 ± 2.1) weeks in the control group, showing no significant difference (t=1.24, P=0.22). No heterotopic ossification or loosening and breakage of internal fixation occurred during follow-up. The shoulder function Neer score of the trial group (86.3 ± 2.8) was significantly higher than that of the control group (80.1 ± 2.1) (t=6.37, P=0.00). The results were excellent in 14 cases, good in 8 cases, fair in 2 cases, and poor in 1 case with an excellent and good rate of 88.0% in the trial group; the results were excellent in 12 cases, good in 7 cases, fair in 2 cases, and poor in 3 cases with an excellent and good rate of 79.2% in the control group; and difference had no statistical significance (Z=0.83, P=0.41). Conclusion Compared with open reduction and plate fixation, minimally invasive cannulated screw for greater tuberosity fracture has the advantages of simple operation, less trauma, less intraoperative blood loss, and good shoulder function recovery.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical experience of 58 operations for biliary malignant tumor with da Vinci surgical system. MethodsFrom January 2009 to October 2010, 180 patients with hepatopancreaticobiliary and gastrointestinal disease underwent robotic surgeries by using da Vinci surgical system, including 58 patients with biliary malignant tumor. The case distribution, intra and postoperative data were analyzed. ResultsOf 58 patients, 3 patients with intrahepatic bile duct cystadenocarcinoma received wedge resections of liver. In 36 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma, anatomical left hemihepatectomies were performed in 3 cases, resection of extrahepatic duct and gallbladder bridge type biliary revascularization in 3 cases, resection of extrahepatic duct and biliary-enteric Roux-en-Y anastomosis in 14 cases, tumor resection and revascularization of hepatic portal bile duct in 1 case, palliative external drainage of intrahepatic bile duct in 5 cases, and Y-internal drainage of hepatic portal in 10 cases. In 10 patients with gallbladder carcinoma, resection of extrahepatic duct and gallbladder and biliaryenteric Roux-en-Y anastomosis in 2 cases, cholecystectmy in 3 cases, cholecystectmy and external drainage of intrahepatic bile duct in 1 case, cholecystectmy and Y-internal drainage by suspension of hepatic portal in 4 cases. A patient with middle bile duct cancer received radical resection of cholangiocarcinoma and biliary-enteric Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Of 8 patients with distal bile duct cancer, Whipple procedure were performed. Of 58 patients, 2 cases converted to hand-assistant procedure (3.4%). For all patients, operation time was (6.18±1.71) h, blood loss was (116.66±56.06) ml, blood transfusion was (85.55±38.28) ml, ambulation time was (9.10±2.91) h, feeding time was (14.95±4.35) h, and hospital stay was (12.81±4.29) d. Postoperative complications occurred in 8 cases (13.8%), including bile leakage (3 cases), wound bleeding (1 case), pancreatoenteric anastomotic leakage (2 cases), pulmonary infection (1 case), and renal failure (1 case). Of these 8 cases, 6 cases recovered smoothly and 2 cases die of severe pulmonary infection and renal failure after conservative treatment (3 or 4 weeks), therefore, the mortality of patients was 3.4%. In 36 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma, 19 cases died (on 2 monthes 4 cases, on 6 monthes 5 cases, on 10 monthes 8 cases, and on 12 monthes 2 cases after operation), 11 cases survival well (gt;26 monthes 4 cases, gt;22 monthes 3 cases, and gt;19 monthes 4 cases), and 6 cases required hospitalization. Of 10 patients with gallbladder carcinoma, 7 cases died (on 3 monthes 1 case, on 5 monthes 1 case, on 8 monthes 1 case, on 11 monthes 3 cases, and on 12 monthes 1 case after operation) and 3 cases survival (gt;17 monthes 2 cases, gt;13 monthes 1 case). In 8 cases undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy, 5 cases died (on 4 monthes 2 cases, on 6 monthes 2 cases, and 10 monthes 1 case after operation) and 3 cases survived well over 2 years. Three patients with intrahepatic bile duct cystadenocarcinoma survived over 1 year. Conclusionsda Vinci surgical system can carry out all kinds of surgery for biliary malignant tumor, especially prominent in the complicated surgeries for hepatic portal, which breaks through the restricted area of laparoscope in hepatobiliary malignant tumor.
Objective To review the latest comparative research of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and traditional open approach. Methods The domestic and foreign literature concerning the comparative research of minimally invasive TLIF and traditional open TLIF was reviewed, then intraoperative indicators, length of hospitalization, effectiveness, complication, fusion rate, and the effect on paraspinal muscles were analyzed respectively. Results Minimally invasive TLIF has less blood loss and shorter length of hospitalization, but with longer operation and fluoroscopic time. Minimally invasive surgery has the same high fusion rate as open surgery, however, its effectiveness is not superior to open surgery, and complication rate is relatively higher. In the aspect of the effect on paraspinal muscles, in creatine kinase, multifidus cross-sectional area, and atrophy grading, minimally invasive surgery has no significant reduced damage on paraspinal muscles. Conclusion Minimally invasive TLIF is not significantly superior to open TLIF, and it does not reduce the paraspinal muscles injury. But prospective double-blind randomized control trials are still needed for further study.
Objective To explore the effectiveness of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) for degenerative lumbar scoliosis stenosis by expandable tubular retractor. Methods Between April 2009 and October 2010, 39 patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis stenosis were treated. Of 39 patients, 20 underwent MI-TLIF (group A) and 19 underwent open surgery (group B). There was no significant differences in gender, age, disease duration, range of lumbar degenerative scoliosis, Cobb angle, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and visual analogue scale (VAS) between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative independently turning over time, postoperative complication rate, Cobb angle, fusion rates, ODI score, and VAS score were compared between 2 groups. Results The operation time of group A was significantly longer than that of group B (P lt; 0.05), and the intraoperative blood loss of group A was significantly less than that of group B (P lt; 0.05); no significant difference was found in postoperative independently turning over time between 2 groups (t=1.869, P=0.069). The complication rate was 20.0% (4/20) in group A and 26.3% (5/19) in group B, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.219, P=0.640). All patients were followed up 2 years to 3 years and 6 months (mean, 2.9 years). At last follow-up, the fusion rate of bone graft was 92.9% (78/84) in group A and 95.2% (80/84) in group B, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.425, P=0.514). According to the Macnab standard for effectiveness evaluation, the results were excellent in 12 cases, good in 6 cases, fair in 1 case, and poor in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 90.0% in group A; the results were excellent in 12 cases, good in 5 cases, and fair in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 89.5% in group B; there was no significant difference between 2 groups (Z= — 0.258, P=0.835). The postoperative VAS score, ODI score, and Cobb angle were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05); and there was no significant differences between 2 groups at 2 weeks after operation and last follow-up (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion MI-TLIF by expandable tubular retractor is an available clinical choice in treating degenerative lumbar scoliosis stenosis. It can obtain the same effectiveness as the open surgery.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) assisted with microscope in treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. MethodsBetween January 2011 and June 2012, 52 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis underwent MI-TLIF assisted with microscope. There were 29 males and 23 females with an average age of 46 years (range, 32-67 years). The median disease duration was 3.2 years (range, 3 months to 6 years). There were 38 cases of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis and 14 cases of degenerative spondylolisthesis; 12 cases had stenosis secondary to lumbar spondylolisthesis. The affected segments were L4, 5 (29 cases) and L5, S1 (23 cases). According to the Meyerding evaluating system, 24 cases were classified as degree I and 28 cases as degree Ⅱ. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Oswestry disability index (ODI)were used for clinical assessment, and the clinical effects were also analyzed by Macnab criterion at last follow-up. The radiographic data were used to evaluate reduction of spondylolisthesis, including slipping degree, slipping angle, and intervertebral space height. The fusion rate was assessed by Suk criterion. ResultsThe operations were performed successfully in all patients. No dural tear or cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred during operation. The average operation time was 105 minutes; the average intraoperative blood loss was 225 mL; the average postoperative drainage volume was 75 mL; and the average hospitalization days were 5.5 days. Superficial infection of incision occurred in 1 case and was cured after change dressing, and primary healing of incision was obtained in the others. All patients were followed up 12-26 months (mean, 18 months). No loosening, breakage, and displacement of pedicle screw and no Cage dislocation occurred by X-ray films after operation. The lumbar spondylolisthesis all got good correction. The three-dimensional CT showed continuous bone trabecula between centrums. The VAS score, ODI, and the slipping degree, slipping angle, and intervertebral space height were significantly improved at last follow-up when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05). According to Macnab criterion at last follow-up, the results were excellent in 20 cases, good in 29 cases, and fair in 3 cases; the excellent and good rate was 94.2%. According to Suk criterion for fusion, 49 cases obtained complete fusion and 3 cases got possible fusion. ConclusionAs long as indications are seized, MI-TLIF assisted with microscope is safe and reliable for treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis (Meyerding dergee I or Ⅱ), and it has the advantage of less injury, less blood loss, less complications, and definite short-term effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo summarize the priority and indications of the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and the evolution of minimally invasive surgery-UKA (MIS-UKA), and to discuss the effectiveness. MethodsThe related literature on UKA was extensively reviewed, summarized, and analyzed. ResultsRecently, satisfactory results has been achieved in UKA for the treatment of single room knee osteoarthritis. Both the design of the single condyle prosthesis and the surgical technique are becoming more advanced, which make the MIS-UKA possible. Especially the application of navigation computer and robot assisted system on UKA improves the accuracy of unicompartmental prosthesis implantation greatly. ConclusionThe superiority and indications of MIS-UKA are gradually expanding with the progress of surgical technique and the design of the single condyle prosthesis. However, whether the application of navigation computer and robot assisted system can improve the effectiveness needs to be further confirmed.
ObjectiveTo compare the outcomes of concomitant mitral valve surgery and tricuspid valve surgery through right minithoracotomy and conventional median sternotomy approaches. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 475 patients underwent mitral valve surgery combined with tricuspid valve surgery through right minithoracotomy or conventional median sternotomy in Xinhua Hospital between June 2006 and June 2013. The patients were divided into two groups including a minimally invasive group(116 patients) and a conventional group (359 patients). ResultsAll the patients successfully underwent mitral valve and tricuspid valve surgery. During operation, there were 426 patients with no trivial mitral regurgitation (MR) and 49 patients with trivial MR. There were 282 patients with no tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and 193 patients with trivil TR. At discharge, transesophageal echocardiography showed that trivial MR in 38 patients, mild MR in 5 patients, trivial tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in 150 patients and mild TR in 7 patients. There was no significant difference between the two groups in complications. ConclusionRight minithoracotomy can achieve the similar therapeutic effect to conventional median sternotomy for patients with mitral valve disease and concomitant tricuspid valve disease. In addition, patients through right minithoracotomy had better cosmetic outcomes.
Objective To evaluate the outcomes and summarize the clinical experience of totally endoscopic mitral valve repair with artificial chordae implantation. Methods From May 2013 to June 2016, 71 patients with mitral valve insufficiency were admitted to our hospital who underwent totally endoscopic mitral valve repair with artificial chordae implantation. There were 47 males and 24 females with the age of 46.0±14.4 years ranging from 13-78 years. The pathogenesis included degenerative valvular diseases in 63 patients, congenital valvular diseases in 4, infectious endocarditis in 2, rheumatic disease in 1 and cardiomyopathy in 1. Prolapse of anterior, posterior, or both leaflets was present in 26 (36.6%), 19 (26.8%), and 25 (35.2%) patients, respectively; one patient (1.4%) presented valve annulus enlargement and thirteen were associated with commissure lesion. The mitral regurgitation area ranged from 4.2 to 26.3 cm2 (mean, 12.2±5.6 cm2). All the procedures were performed by total endoscopy under cardiac arrest. 5-0 Gore-tex sutures were used as the material of artificial chordae which was implanted one by one. Results There was no in-hospital death. One patient was transferred to mitral valve replacement, and one median sternotomy due to bleeding. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 156.0±31.6 min and aortic cross-clamp time 110.0±20.1 min. We finally had 39 isolated mitral valve repair, 28 mitral valve repair combined tricuspid valve repair, 3 mitral valve repair combined atrial septal defect closure, and 1 mitral valve repair combined correction of partial anomalous pulmonary vein connection. Each patient was implanted artificial chordae of 2.5±1.7 (ranging from 1 to 7), and 65 patients received mitral annulus (full ring). The intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography found no mitral regurgitation in 44 patients, the area of mitral regurgitation was 0-2 cm2 in 24, and 3 patients with mitral regurgitation>2 cm2 experienced serious systolic anterior motion. Of the 3 patients with systolic anterior motion (SAM), one transferred to mitral valve replacement, one underwent mitral re-repair, and one took conservative treatment. The mean follow-up was 12.7±10.5 months (range: 1 to 36 months), while 2 patients were lost to follow up with the follow-up rate of 97.2%. Recurrent severe regurgitation occured in 3 patients, moderate in 5, mild or trivial in 27 and no regurgitation in 36. During the follow-up, 1 patient died of myocardiopathy-induced heart failure post discharge, 1 suffered from cerebral infarction, and no patient underwent reoperation. Conclusion The totally endoscopic surgical treatment of mitral valvuloplasty with artificial chordae is reliable for patients with mitral valve prolapse, which provides favorable clinical efficacy and outcomes. The difficulty lies in how to determine the appropriate length of the chordae and keep the stability of length.
ObjectiveTo compare the outcomes of repeated tricuspid valve surgery for patients with late severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after cardiac surgery through right anterior minithoracotomy and conventional median sternotomy approaches. MethodsBetween June 2002 and June 2013, 89 patients with late severe tricuspid regurgitation after cardiac surgery underwent repeated tricuspid valve surgery through right anterior minithoracotomy in our hospital. The patients were divided into two groups. Fifty one patients were in a minimally invasive group with 28 males and 23 females at age of 46.59±11.53 years. Thirty eight patients were in a conventional median sternotomy (conventional group) with 15 males and 23 females at age of 50.42±9.30 years. The outcomes of the two groups were compared. ResultsThere was no statisitcal difference in preoperative clinical data between two groups. All patients successfully underwent repeated tricuspid valve surgery. Tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) was performed in 68 patients (38 patients vs. 30 patients), and tricuspid valvuloplasty (TVP) was performed in 21 patients (13 patients vs. 8 patients). Compared with the conventional group, operation time, time of establishing cardiopulmonary bypass and postoperative in-hospital time were significantly shorter in the minimally invasive group (P<0.001). The postoperative drainage was significantly reduced in the minimally invasive group compared with the value of the conventional group (P<0.001). Three patients died in the early postoperative period (1 patient vs. 2 patients). In the conventional group, one patient needed re-exploration for bleeding and 2 patients had wound infection. At discharge, transthoracic echocardiography showed that all patients had no or mild TR and no paravalvular leakage occurred. During the follow-up (12-144 months), 4 patients died (2 patients vs. 2 patients). In the minimally invasive group, one patient underwent repeated TVR due to severe TR associated with infective endocarditis, and another patient had moderate TR. In the conventional group, one patient underwent repeated TVR due to mechanical valve thrombosis. ConclusionRight anterior minithoracotomy is safe, effective and reliable for patients with late severe TR after cardiac surgery. It has the similar effect of the correction of valvular lesions with conventional median sternotomy, but right anterior minithoracotomy has more benefits, including more, minimally invasive, less blood loss, shorter operation time and faster recover.