Objective To compare the clinical outcomes and safety of minimally invasive and routine mitral valve repair or replacement for patients with single mitral valve disease. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 67 patients with single mitral valve disease （without aortic valve and tricuspid valve lesion or other heart diseases including atrial septal defect） who underwent mitral valve repair or replacement in the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University between January and July 2011. The patients were divided into two groups according to different surgical approaches：the minimally invasive surgery group （n=29，8 males and 21 females，age 51.4±9.4 years） underwent minimally invasive mitral valve repair or replacement via right mini-thoractomy；and the routine surgery group （n=38，11 males and 27 females，age 53.6±11.9 years） underwent mitral valve repair or replacement via middle sternotomy. In the minimally invasive surgery group，9 patients underwent mitral valve repair while the other 20 patients underwent mitral valve replacement. And no patient underwent transition to routine operation. In the routine surgery group，15 patients underwent mitral valve repair and 23 patients underwent mitral valve replacement. Clinical outcomes and safety of the operations were compared between the two groups. Results There was no statistical difference in operation time between the two groups （207.9±18.1 min versus 198.4±27.5 min，P=0.076）. The amount of postoperative drainage （126.7±34.5 ml versus 435.6±87.2 ml，P=0.000） and blood transfusion （red blood cell 1.4±0.8 U versus 2.3±1.1 U，P=0.000；blood plasma 164.3±50.4 ml versus 405.6±68.9 ml，P=0.000） of the minimally invasive surgery group were significantly lower than those of the routine surgery group. The cardiopulmonary bypass time （81.7±23.9 min versus 58.7±13.6 min，P=0.000） and aortic-clamping time （51.6±12.7 min versus 38.4±11.7 min，P=0.000） of the minimally invasive surgery group were significantly longer than those of the routine surgery group. The length of ICU stay （22.5±3.6 h versus 31.7±8.5 h，P=0.000），mechanical ventilation （7.4±3.2 h versus 11.2±5.1 h，P=0.000） and postoperative hospitalization （7.1±1.6 d versus 13.5±2.4 d，P=0.000） of the minimally invasive surgery group were significantly shorter than those of the routine surgery group. There was no statistical difference in postoperative complications between the two groups. Minimally invasive surgery group patients were followed up for 5.3±2.4 months with a follow-up rate of 72.4%（21/29）. Routine surgery group patients were followed up for 5.5±3.8 months with a follow-up rate of 71.0%（27/38）. There was no significant complication during follow-up in both two groups. Conclusion Minimally invasive mitral valve operation via right mini-thoracotomy is effective and safe with a good cosmetic result. Compared with routine operation，patients undergoing minimally invasive operation recover better and faster.
Abstract： Objective To summarize our experience and clinical outcomes of preservation of posterior leaflet and subvalvular structures in mitral valve replacement（MVR）. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 1 035 patients who underwent MVR in Beijing An Zhen Hospital from January 2006 to March 2011. There were 562 male patients and 473 female patients with their age of 37-78（53.84±13.13）years old. There were 712 patients with rheumatic valvular heart disease and 323 patients with degenerative valve disease, 389 patients with mitral stenosis and 646 patients with mitral regurgitation. No patient had coronary artery disease in this group. For 457 patients in non-preservation group, bothleaflets and corresponding chordal excision was performed, while for 578 patients in preservation group, posterior leafletand subvalvular structures were preserved. There was no statistical difference in demographic and preoperative clinical characteristics between the two groups. Postoperative mortality and morbidity, and left ventricular size and function were compared between the two groups. Results There was no statistical difference in postoperative mortality（2.63% vs. 1.21%, P =0.091）and morbidity （8.53% vs. 7.44%, P=0.519）between the non-preservation group and preservation group, except that the rate of left ventricular rupture of non-preservation group was significantly higher than that of preservation group（1.09% vs. 0.00%, P=0.012）. The average left ventricular end-diastolic dimension （LVEDD）measured by echocardiography 6 months after surgery decreased in both groups, but there was no statistical difference between the two groups. The average left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 6 months after surgery was significantly improved compared with preoperative average LVEF in both groups. The average LVEF 6 months after surgery in patients with mitral regurgitation in the preservation group was significantly higher than that in non-preservation group （56.00%±3.47% vs. 53.00%±3.13%，P =0.000）, and there was no statistical difference in the average LVEF 6 months after surgery in patients with mitral stenosis between the two groups（57.00%±5.58% vs. 56.00%±4.79%，P =0.066）. Conclusion Preservation of posterior leaflet and subvalvular structures in MVR is a safe and effective surgical technique to reduce the risk of left ventricle rupture and improve postoperative left ventricular function．
Objective To evaluate long-term clinical results in patients who underwent mitral valve replacement and suture tricuspid annuloplasty. Methods We included 401 patients who underwent mitral valve replacement and suture tricuspid annuloplasty in our hospital between January 2006 and March 2011. There were 309 females and 92 males at age of 17-71 (46.2±12.0) years. All patients were investigated by echocardiography at postoperative 5 years. The tricuspid valve procedures consisted of bicuspidization, modified Kay annuloplasty and leaflet repair according to the actual conditions. Results The patients were followed up for 5–10 (7.4±1.4) years. As compared with preoperation, the right atrium (RA, 7.6±13.0 mm vs. 49.3±13.2 mm), right ventrium (RV, 23.2±4.7 mm vs. 22.0±3.6 mm), left atrium (LA, 59.7±19.0 mm vs. 53.6±14.7 mm, left ventrium (LV, 49.3±8.6 mm vs. 47.7±6.2 mm), tricuspid of end-distolic diameters (TEDD, 35.9±5.7 mm vs. 32.8±5.9 mm) and tricuspid of end-systolic diameters (TESD, 9.4±5.7 mm vs. 26.5±4.9 mm) of patients decreased significantly at postoperation (P<0.01). As compared with preoperation, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, 60.3%±8.9% vs. 61.7%±8.3%) and left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS, 32.6%±6.3% vs. 33.8%±5.5%) raised significantly at postoperation (P<0.01). As compared with preoperation, the constituent rate of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) improved significantly at postoperation (P<0.01). Conclusion Tricuspid annuloplasty adopting TEDD as a surgical indication is reasonable for patients with mitral diseases. Combined and individualized suture tricuspid annuloplasty can obtain better long-term results. It is needed to order aggressive diuretics treatment for patients with postoperative TR.
ObjectiveTo compare early outcomes of the minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) through right anterolateral mini-thoracotomy (ALMT) with conventional mitral valve surgery (MVS), and evaluate feasibility and safety of MIMVS. MethodsFrom January 2011 to December 2013, 120 patients undergoing elective MVS in Nanjing First Hospital were prospectively enrolled in this study. There were 72 male and 48 female patients with their age of 22-71 (42.4±11.0) years. Using a random number table, all the patients were randomly divided into a portaccess MIMVS group (MIMVS group, n=60) and a conventional MVS group (conventional group, n=60). MIMVS group patients received port-access cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) establishment via femoral artery, femoral vein and right internal jugular vein cannulation through right ALMT 5-6 cm in length. Special MIMVS operative instruments were used for mitral valve repair or replacement. Conventional group patients received mitral valve repair or replacement under conventional CPB through median sternotomy. Perioperative clinical data, morbidity and mortality were compared between the 2 groups. ResultsThere was no death in-hospital or shortly after discharge in this study. CPB time (98.0±26.0 minutes vs. 63.0±21.0 minutes) and aortic cross-clamping time (68.0±9.0 minutes vs.37.0±6.0 minutes) of MIMVS group were significantly longer than those of conventional group (P<0.05). Postoperative mechanical ventilation time (6.0±3.9 hours vs. 11.2±5.6 hours), length of ICU stay (18.5±3.0 hours vs. 28.6±9.5 hours) and postoperative hospital stay (8.0±2.0 days vs. 13.5±2.5 days) of MIMVS group were significantly shorter than those of conventional group (P<0.05). Chest drainage volume within postoperative 12 hours (110.0±30.0 ml vs. 385.0±95.0 ml) and the percentage of patients receiving blood transfusion (25.0% vs. 58.3%) of MIMVS group were significantly lower than those of conventional group (P<0.05). Patients were followed up for 1-24 months, and the follow-up rate was 94.2%. There was no statistical difference in postoperative morbidity or mortality between the 2 groups (P>0.05). ConclusionMIMVS through right ALMT is a safe and feasible procedure for surgical treatment of mitral valve diseases. MIMVS can achieve similar clinical outcomes as conventional MVS, but can significantly shorten postoperative ICU stay and hospital stay, reduce blood transfusion, and is a good alternative to conventional MVS.
ObjectiveTo evaluate outcomes of mitral valvuloplasty with artificial chord and mitral annuloplasty ring in patients with mitral valve prolapse. MethodsFrom January 2012 to March 2014, mitral valvuloplasty with artificial chord and mitral annuloplasty ring were performed for 58 patients with mitral valve prolapsed in Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, among which 47 simple anterior or posterior mitral valvuloplasty and 11 combined anterior-posterior mitral valvuloplasty were completed. There were 33 males and 25 females aged (53.7±14.3) years. ResultsThere was no in-hospital death. Three patients received mitral valve replacement. The transoesophageal echocardiography found no or trivial mitral regurgitation in 48 patients, mild mitral regurgitation in 7 patients. The diameter of the left atrium (LA) and left ventricle (LV), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) were significantly decreased after the operation. During the follow-up of 6 months to 2 years, the cardiac function of the patients improved. ConclusionMitral valvuloplasty with artificial chord and mitral annuloplasty ring is simple, reliable and effective treatment for patients with mitral valve prolapse, and its shortand mid-term outcome is good.
Objective To examine the regression, residue, or progression of tricuspid regurgitation （TR） after mitral valve replacement so as to improve the clinical evaluation and management of TR. Methods From January 1998 to December 2003, a total of 287 consecutive patients of mitral valve replacement were followed and reviewed for this study. There were 86 male patients and 201 female patients whose ages ranged from 15 to 66 years （41.0±11.0 years）. The predominant mitral vane lesion was stenosis in 199 patients （69%）, regurgitation in 66 patients （23%） and mixed in 22 patients （8%）. A total of 201 patients （70%） had atrial fibrillation and 86 patients （30%） were in sinus rhythm. According to ratio of maximal regurgitation area to right atrial area TR was graded as mild （＋）, mild-moderate （＋/＋＋） moderate （＋＋） moderate-severe （＋＋/＋＋＋） and severe （＋＋＋）. There were 101 mild TR （36.7%）, 5 mild-moderate（1.8%）, 27 moderate （9.8%）, 2 moderate-severe （0.7%） and 21 severe （7.6%）. Depending on the surgical findings tricuspid annuloplasty was performed. The patients were followed in outpatient clinical and had echocardiography evaluation regularly. Results The follow-up ranged from 2 to 7 years （4.0±1.6 years）. Twelve patients were lost during the follow-up periods. Compared with preoperation, clinical condition of the majority of patients was improved after surgery. The diameter of left atrium, right atrium, left ventricle and right ventricle decreased significantly after operation （P〈0.01）. The ejection fraction and fraction of shorting increased significantly after surgery （P〈0.05）. However there were no significantly changes between pre- TR and post- TR in these patients （P〉0.05）. Tricuspid annuloplasty was not performed for 129 patients who had TR because TR was judged intraoperatively not to be severe. Of those patients, TR regressed in 54 patients, improved in 12 patients, did not change in 46 patients and progressed in 17 patients respectively after surgery. There were 27 patients who received De Vega tricuspid annuloplasty. Among them, TR regressed in 10 patients, improved in 12 patients and did not change in 5 patients respectively after surgery. Conclusion It is not adequate to evaluate the degree of TR in mitral valve diseases with rate of maximal regurgitation area to right atrial area. It should be improved to adopt intraoperative findings for tricuspid annuloplasty. TR may occur in patients who do not have TR before operation.
Objective To observe whether the adoptation of tricuspid annulus diameter as surgical indication for tricuspid annuloplasty will reduce the occurrence of moderate-severe tricuspid regurgitation(TR) in patients after mitral valve replacement (MVR). Methods Between April 2005 and June 2006, MVR was performed in 56 patients with no or mild TR in our Department. The patients were divided into two groups according to tricuspid annulus diameter(TAD)/body surface area (BSA)≥21mm/m2. Tricuspid annuloplasty group(TA group): 22 cases, male 8, female 14, age 45.0±7.7 years, TAD 36.8±3.8mm, BSA 1.57±0.15m2, New York Heart Association(NYHA) functional class Ⅲ/Ⅲ-Ⅳ 18/4, sinus rhythm(SR)/atrial fibrillation (AF) 2/20. Notricuspid annuloplasty group (NTA group): 34 cases, male 9, female 25, age 42.9±11.0 years, TAD 28.5±4.4mm, BSA 1.58±0.13m2, NYHA Ⅲ/Ⅲ-Ⅳ 28/6, SR/AF 9/25. Kay annuloplasty was performed for TA group patients. The patients were followed in outpatient clinical regularly and evaluated by echocardiography at 6 months after operation. Results All patients recovered and were discharged from hospital. The duration of follow-up was 11.0±2.4 months. Except 2 cases, all patients received echocardiography evaluation at 6 months after operation. There were no significantly differences between two groups patients in general clinical characteristics (Pgt;0.05). Compared with NTA group before operation, right atrial diameter (RAD, 49.3±7.0mm) and TAD(36.8±3.8mm) were bigger and more mild TR in TA group (Plt;0.05). RAD(44.1±8.9mm) and TAD(28.9±6.1mm) reduced and the proportion of TR degree improved (Plt;0.05) in TA group but did not occur in NTA group after surgery (Pgt;0.05). There were three cases of moderate TR in NTA group. Conclusion Tricuspid annuloplasty adopting TAD as surgical indication may reduce the occurrences of postoperative moderate-severe TR for patients of MVR with no or mild preoperative TR.
Objective To summarize the clinical characteristics and management experiences of patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after mitral valve surgery. Methods Thirty patients were followed up and reviewed for this report. There were 1 male and 29 female patients whose ages ranged from 32 to 65 years (47.1±92 years). A total of 28 patients had atrial fibrillation and 2 patients were in sinus rhythm. There were 13 patients of mild TR, 10 patients of moderate TR and 7 patients of severe TR at the first mitral valve surgery. Five patients received the tricuspid annuloplasty of De Vega procedure at the same time, 2 patients received Kay procedure. The predominant presentation of patients included: abdominal discomfort (93.3%, 28/30), edema (66.7%,20/30), palpitation (56.7%, 17/30), and ascites (20%, 6/30). Results Nine patients underwent the secondary surgery for severe TR. The secondary surgery included tricuspid valve replacement (6 cases), mitral and tricuspid valve replacement (2 cases) and Kay procedure (1 case). Eight patients were recovered and discharged and 1 patient died from the bleeding of right atrial incision and low output syndrome. Twentyone patients received medical management and were followed up. One case was lost during followup. Conclusion Surgery or medical management should be based on the clinical characteristics of patients with severe TR after mitral valve surgery. It should be based on the features of tricuspid valve and the clinical experience of surgeon to perform tricuspid annuloplasty or replacement.
Abstract: Objective To summarize the clinical results of homemade flexible annuloplasty ring in mitral valve repair, in order to discuss the appropriate ring size. Methods Sixtysix patients (55 males,and 11 females with a mean age of 44.62±15.94 years) with mitral insufficiency underwent mitral valve repair with homemade flexible annuloplasty ring from April 2002 to November 2009 in Fu Wai Hospital. In order to choose the ring with an appropriate size, we made and kept to the following principles: if the intercommissural distance was bigger than size 30, we chose a ring 2size smaller; if the measured distance was smaller than size 30, 1size smaller ring would be chosen. Patients were followed by echocardiography to observe the mitral valve function. Results All patients were cured and discharged from the hospital. The results of echocardiography showed mild to moderate regurgitation in 1 patient, mild regurgitation in 11 patients, and normal mitral function or trace regurgitation in the rest 54 patients. Mitral valve forward velocity was 1.40±0.30 m/s with no mitral stenosis or systolic anterior motion (SAM) of the anterior mitral leaflet. Fiftyone patients were followed up from 2 months to 7 years(24.60±25.90 months). The results of echocardiography on 38 patients showed that 1 patient had moderate regurgitation, 5 patients had mild to moderate regurgitation, 9 patients had mild regurgitation and others had normal mitral function or trace regurgitation. For these 38 patients included in the followup study, mitral valve forward velocity was 1.50±0.40 m/s with no mitral stenosis, SAM or left ventricular outlet tract obstruction. During the followup, the left atrium size (43.19±10.48 mm vs. 48.59±9.40 mm, t=4.524, P=0.000) and left ventricular end diastolic diameter (52.64±7.35 mm vs. 6269±8.77 mm, t=7.607, P=0.000) decreased significantly than the preoperative size and diameter respectively. The application of restrictive homemade flexible annuloplasty ring in mitral valve annuloplasty had satisfactory, durable and stable clinical results.
ObjectiveTo summarize clinical outcomes of mitral valve replacement (MVR) with modified anterior leaflet preservation technique,improve therapeutic effects and reduce postoperative mortality and morbidity. MethodsFrom May 2005 to December 2012,128 patients underwent MVR with modified anterior leaflet preservation technique (modified group) in Beijing Anzhen Hospital,among whom 14 patients received concomitant aortic valve replacement. There were 49 male and 79 female patients in the modified group with their age of 45.0±12.3 years. Another 128 patients who underwent routine MVR during the same period were also included in this study as the control group,including 55 male and 73 female patients with their age of 48.0±8.4 years. There was no statistical difference in preoperative clinical characteristics between the 2 groups (P>0.05). ResultsIn the modified group,there was no perioperative death. Postoperatively,6 patients received reexploration for bleeding,4 patients had low cardiac output syndrome,5 patients had pulmonary infection,1 patient received tracheostomy,and 3 patients had acute kidney failure (AKI). In the control group,5 patients died postoperatively including 3 patients with left ventricular rupture and 2 patients with severe low cardiac output syndrome. Postoperatively,5 patients received reexploration for bleeding,12 patients had low cardiac output syndrome,4 patients had pulmonary infection,and 6 patients had AKI. Echocardiography at 6th month during follow-up showed that left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) and left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD) of modified group patients were improved compared with control group patients. There was statistical difference in LVEF and LVESD between the 2 groups (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in LVEDD between the 2 groups (P>0.05). LVEF,LVEDD and LVESD of modified group patients during follow-up were statistically different from preoperative values (P<0.05). LVEDD of control group patients during follow-up was statistically different from preoperative LVEDD (P<0.05). LVEF and LVESD of control group patients during follow-up was not statistically different from preoperative values (P>0.05). ConclusionMVR with modified anterior leaflet preservation technique is simple to perform with satisfactory short-term results. This technique is suitable for various types of mitral valve diseases especially degenerative mitral valve disease and infective endocarditis.