The prevalence, incidence, and medical expenses of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is extremely high in Taiwan, China; so decreasing the incidence of ESRD is a major work for kidney disease prevention in Taiwan, China. Current chronic kidney disease (CKD) guideline suggests multidisciplinary team (MDT) care for CKD patient with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 30 mL/(min·1.73 m2). MDT includes not only nephrologist but also nursing specialty, dietitian, social worker, psychologist, and other professional personnel. The aim of the MDT care is to preserve renal function, decrease complications, provide nutrient support and nephrotoxic drug consultation, establish the concept of renal replacement therapy and preparation for dialysis access, provide the renal transplantation information, and give the psychosocial support. These cares should provide to CKD patients one year before starting renal replacement therapy. The MDT care for CKD could delay the progression from CKD to ESRD, lower the mortality and hospitalization of CKD, slow the renal function decline, provide better medical care and quality of life for patients, and decrease the medical expenditures. Besides, advanced CKD patients receiving MDT care have higher arteriovenous access preparation rate that prevent the additional intervention and hospitalization while starting dialysis. MDT care also decreases the hospitalization costs and medical expenditures, and decrease 3-year mortality rate after dialysis initiation. The further developing MDT care includes: (1) providing personalized renal care and treatment model, and intergraded care by cardiology-nephrology-diabetes-neurology model; (2) new iCKD care with health management platform and care mode combined with communication technology; (3) shared decision making for choice of renal replacement therapy; (4) advance care planning clinic for palliative treatment of ESRD. All MDT care hopes to establish a person-oriented care policy, provides a better quality care model, not only for the patient’s personalized medical care, but also hopes to improve the overall kidney disease care and prevention work. In addition, we can extend the CKD prevention and treatment experience to other countries worldwide.
ObjectiveTo investigate multidisciplinary collaborative role in the treatment of patients with lower extremity degloving injury. MethodsThe wound therapy group and the Department of Orthopedics, Nutrition, and Psychology, and the Pain Clinic and Rehabilitation team collaboratively carried out the comprehensive intervention for a patient with lower extremity degloving injury in March 2013 in our hospital. The wound therapist was responsible for correct evaluation, debridement, infection control, maintaining moisture balance, and protecting wound edges of the skin; The wound team members were responsible for the entire treatment and healing process in the form of text and photos; Department of Orthopedics was responsible for secondary skin graft; Nutrition division was responsible for the correction of anemia in patients with hypoalbuminemia; Psychological service was responsible for psychological counseling as treatment accident sometimes brought psychological trauma; Pain outpatient service was responsible for consultation, formulating specific plans to control and relieve the patient's pain, and promote the patient's physical and mental rehabilitation process; Rehabilitation division was responsible for the guidance of patients on lower limb function exercise, prevention of knee joint rigidity, muscle stiffness, to promote the functional recovery of lower limbs. ResultsThe patient's wound was healed completely without scar or joint contracture. Function of lower limbs recovered to normal. Patients was very satisfied to the treatment, and had a total full recovery of body and mind, and returned to the family and society. ConclusionMultidisciplinary collaboration treatment for patients with lower extremity degloving injury can ease pain, eliminate psychological barriers, promote wound healing, and maintain the limb function.
ObjectiveTo investige the effects of multidisciplinary perioperative nutrition management on nutrition and postoperative complications of patients with esophageal cancer.MethodsA total of 239 patients with esophageal cancer who received elective surgical treatment were included in the study. They were divided into a trial group (120 patients) and a control group (119 patients) according to the random number table method. There were 97 males and 23 females in the trial group with an average age of 63.78±9.13 years, and 94 males and 25 females in the control group with an average age of 64.12±7.91 years. The control group received routine diet management, and the trial group received multidisciplinary perioperative nutrition management. The differences of nutrition and postoperative complications between the two groups were compared.ResultsThe total protein and albumin levels on postoperative days 3 and 7 in the trial group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05), patients' postoperative anal exhaust time was shorter than that in the control group (P<0.05), the incidence of postoperative gastrointestinal adverse reactions, lung infection, postoperative anastomotic fistula, hypoproteinemia on postoperative days 3 and 7 was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05), and hospitalization cost was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05).ConclusionMultidisciplinary nutrition management can effectively improve the nutrition of patients, promote the rapid recovery of postoperative gastrointestinal function, reduce postoperative complications, and reduce hospitalization costs. It has high clinical reference and promotion value.
With the increasing number of chronic kidney disease (CKD) population globally, establishing an optimal model of CKD care has become an important issue. The major contents of CKD care include patient education, control of CKD risk factors (such as increased blood pressure and glucose), management of CKD complications, and preparation process of renal replacement therapy in pre-dialysis patients. Compared with other non-communicable diseases management, evidence-based evidence related to CKD care is limited. Based on the related studies worldwide, combined with the characteristics of CKD population and previous experiences in China, this paper discusses the management mode of non-dialysis CKD population.
Objective To explore the clinical effect of multidisciplinary team (MDT) in elderly patients with hip fracture under the model of close-type medical alliance. Methods The elderly patients with hip fracture treated in the Department of Orthopedics of Deyang People’s Hospital between January 2015 and December 2020 were included retrospectively. According to different treatment modes, the patients were divided into traditional mode treatment group (traditional group) and MDT mode treatment group (MDT group). The waiting time for operation, hospitalization time after operation, total hospitalization time, total hospitalization cost, and death and loss of follow-up were analyzed. Results A total of 661 patients were enrolled, including 275 in the traditional group and 386 in the MDT group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, Charlson comorbidity index, types of fracture or surgical methods (P>0.05). The waiting time for operation [5.50 (3.50, 7.50) vs. 6.00 (4.00, 6.00) d; Z=−3.473, P=0.001], hospitalization time after operation [7.44 (6.27, 8.67) vs. 8.34 (6.72, 13.70) d; Z=−4.996, P<0.001] and total hospitalization time [12.95 (10.46, 16.30) vs. 15.49 (11.77, 19.91) d; Z=−5.718, P<0.001] in the MDT group were shorter than those in the traditional group. The total hospitalization cost of the MDT group was higher than that of the traditional group, but the difference was not statistically significant [39 300 (33 400, 46 400) vs. 38 000 (31 800, 44 000) Yuan; Z=1.524, P=0.128]. There was no significant difference in the lost follow-up rate between the traditional group and the MDT group (9.82% vs. 6.48%; χ2=2.474, P=0.116). Except in-hospital mortality and 30-day postoperative mortality (P>0.05), there was significant difference between the traditional group and the MDT group in 6-month (6.45% vs. 2.77%; χ2=4.875, P=0.027) and 1-year (11.29% vs. 6.37%; χ2=4.636, P=0.031) postoperative mortality. Conclusion Under the model of close-type medical alliance, MDT can reduce the waiting time for operation, hospitalization time after operation, total hospitalization time, as well as 6-month and 1-year postoperative mortality.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of multidisciplinary team (MDT) on perioperative complications and clinical efficacy of patients who were receiver radical operation to treat lung cancer by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). MethodsEighty patients in the Thoracic Surgery Department of First Hospital of Lanzhou University from December 2017 to February 2019 who were diagnosed lung cancer were divided into two groups. Forty patients in the MDT group were treated with MDT discussion. The control group consisted of 40 patients who were treated without MDT discussion. The incidence of postoperative complications and clinical efficacy were compared between the two groups . ResultsThere was no statistical difference in incision infection, atelectasis, pleural effusion and pulmonary leakage between the two groups. However, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection (5% vs. 20%, P=0.043) and the overall postoperative complications (17.5% vs. 42.5%, P=0.015) in the MDT group was lower than that in the control group with a statistical difference. In the MDT group, the operative time (140.3±8.0 min vs. 148.8±6.8 min, P<0.001), intraoperative bleeding ( 207.8±19.4 mL vs. 222.0±28.3 mL, P=0.010), lymph node dissection number (25.1±6.2 vs. 20.1±7.0, P=0.001), postoperative drainage (273.0±33.5 mL vs. 24.0±52.5 mL, P<0.001), drainage duration (81.9±6.1 h vs. 85.3±8.1 h, P=0.039), pain on the first day after surgery (4.6±0.7 vs. 5.4±0.7), P<0.001), pain on the second day (2.5±0.7 vs. 3.0±0.8, P=0.002), pain on the third day (1.1±0.8 vs. 1.5±0.6, P=0.014), postoperative activity time (40.7±6.7 h vs. 35.3±7.1 h, P<0.001), postoperative recovery time (6.8±0.9 d vs. 7.4±0.7 d, P=0.003), patient satisfaction (8.1±1.4 vs. 7.2±2.0, P=0.020) were significantly better than those of the control group with statistical differences. But there was no statistical difference in the conversion to thoracotomy between the two group. ConclusionMDT discussion can reduce the surgical risk and postoperative complications, improve the clinical efficacy and accelerate the postoperative rehabilitation of patients, which has a good clinical significance.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy of multidisciplinary team (MDT) model combined with Da Vinci robot-assisted thoracic surgery in the treatment of early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MethodsFrom July 2020 to December 2021, the patients with NSCLC who received Da Vinci robot-assisted thoracic surgery in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command were collected. According to whether MDT were performed before hospitalization, the patients were divided into an MDT group and a common group. The recovery and clinical efficacy were compared between the two groups. ResultsA total of 187 patients were enrolled, including 81 males and 106 females, aged 63 (56, 67) years. There were 85 patients in the MDT group, and 102 patients in the common group. Compared with the common group, the MDT group had lower incidence of postoperative complications (9.4% vs. 29.4%, P=0.017), shorter intraoperative operation time [55 (45, 61) min vs. 79 (65, 90) min, P<0.001], and less intraoperative blood loss [25 (20, 30) mL vs. 30 (20, 50) mL, P=0.029] in the same operation mode. In addition, the drainage volume on the second postoperative day [270 (200, 350) mL vs. 215 (190, 300) mL, P=0.004], the number of dissected lymph nodes groups [6 (5, 6) groups vs. 5 (3, 6) groups, P=0.004] and the number of dissected lymph nodes [16 (13, 21) vs. 13 (9, 20), P=0.005] in the MDT group were significantly better than those in the common group. The differences in the postoperative intubation time and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). ConclusionMDT combined with Da Vinci robot-assisted thoracic surgery can further reduce the risk of surgery, improve the clinical treatment effect, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, and accelerate the rehabilitation of patients.
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a neurological disorder characterized by an unexplained increase in intracranial pressure that primarily affects obese women of childbearing age, but individuals of any age, gender, or weight may also be affected. Its signature symptoms include disc edema, headache, visual disturbance, and throbbing tinnitus. Due to potentially serious complications, such as vision loss, accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment management are critical to improving patients' quality of life. Ophthalmologists play a key role in the treatment process, as about half of patients first visit the eye department. Diagnosis of IIH depends not only on clinical presentation, but also on the exclusion of other diseases that may cause similar symptoms, and imaging and other tests to ensure an accurate diagnosis. In order to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficiency, multidisciplinary collaborative diagnosis and treatment mode is advocated, especially in the face of patients with complex trauma or systemic diseases, which can effectively shorten the treatment time and ensure patient safety. Future research directions include establishing China's IIH epidemiological database, exploring clinical diagnosis and treatment methods and basic scientific research, aiming at forming diagnosis and treatment standards suitable for China's national conditions, improving medical level and improving patient prognosis. At the same time, a deeper understanding of the different forms of IIH will better serve the affected populations.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of early graded respiratory severe rehabilitation training for patients with mechanical ventilation under a multidisciplinary model.MethodsTwo hundred and thirty-six patients were surveyed, who were hospitalized in the intensive care unit of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from June 3, 2019 to March 31, 2020. They were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, with 118 patients in each group. The observation group received rehabilitation training using early graded rehabilitation training under the mode of multidisciplinary cooperation, while the control group received routine respiratory rehabilitation training. Diaphragmatic excursion (DE) and diaphragmatic thickening fraction (DTF) of the patients before ventilator weaning were measured by ultrasound. The differences of DE, DTF, peak expiratory flow (PEF), maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), success rate of withdrawal, duration of mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) stay between the two groups were recorded and compared.ResultsAll evaluation indexes were statistically significant between the observation group and the control group (all P<0.05). There were interaction between oxygenation index, PEF, MIP, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Score, Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score and recovery time.ConclusionRehabilitation training on early graded severe respiratory diseases under a multidisciplinary model can improve the respiratory function of patients on mechanical ventilation and shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay.
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is a treasure of the Chinese nation. Presence of clinical effects represents a fundamental issue for TCM development. Nevertheless, the complexities of TCM interventions often result in presented effects deviating from expected ones, a phenomenon so called as "effect off-target"; this issue has become a major challenge for the development and use of TCM interventions. In continuing efforts, we have proposed an innovative evidence-based medicine model for studying the effects of TCM interventions, termed "systems evidence-based medicine (sysEBM)". Essentially, the sysEBM model integrates clinical and non-clinical evaluation to develop a systematic pathway for studying effects of TCM interventions, and the methodological steps typically include the development of PICO framework for a putative effect, exploration of the effect and confirmation of the effect by using animal models, observational studies and clinical trials. As an additional step, multidisciplinary technologies including pharmaceutical, pharmacological, information and biological technologies will be used to provide multidimensional analyses of potential action networks and mechanisms of TCM interventions. Building on this concept, we have developed a sysEBM model ("6R" model) for acupuncture and marketed Chinese patent medicines by integrating real-world evidence, clinical trials, evidence syntheses, and rapid recommendation methodologies, as well as information technology and biomedical technologies. We also applied this model for developing TCM interventions for maternal health, critical care, and knee osteoarthritis.