Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of soft tissue reconstruction after resection of musculoskeletal tumor and to discuss the strategy of soft tissue reconstruction. Methods Between June 2003 and December 2010, 90 patients with musculoskeletal tumor underwent tumor resection and soft tissue reconstruction. There were 59 males and 31 females with a median age of 37.2 years (range, 9-85 years), including 52 bone tumors and 38 soft tissue tumors. One stage reconstruction of soft tissue was performed after tumor resection in 75 cases; reconstruction of soft tissue was performed after debridement in 7 cases of wound dehiscence; and two stage reconstruction of soft tissue was performed after debridement and vacuum sealing drainage placement in 8 cases of infected wounds. The gastrocnemiums flap was used in 40 cases, the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap in 6 cases, rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in 4 cases, gluteus maximus musculocutaneous flap in 1 case, pectoralis major muscle flap in 1 case, cross-abdominal flap in 1 case, local transfer flap in 27 cases, pedicled flaps in 5 cases, and skin grafts in 5 cases. The size of the flap ranged from 6.5 cm × 4.5 cm to 21.0 cm × 9.0 cm. Results Eighty-seven flaps survived, and incisions healed by first intention in 81 cases. In 6 cases of healing by second intention, 2 had partial flap necrosis, which was cured by dressing change; 3 had delayed healing; 1 had mild infection, which was cured after conservative treatment. Wound of donor site healed primarily, and the grafted skin survived. Seventy-three patients were followed up 10-102 months (mean, 36.1 months). Local tumor recurrence was observed in 6 patients, who received second resection at 2-27 months (mean, 8.2 months) after operation. Thirteen patients dead of primary disease at 6-34 months (mean, 19.2 months) after operation. Conclusion The defects caused by resection of musculoskeletal tumor require soft tissue reconstructions. Optimal reconstruction can enhance wound closure, decrease incidence of wound complication, preserve limb function.
Objective To investigate the surgical characteristics and preliminary effectiveness of Orthofix unilateral external fixator in the treatment of musculoskeletal tumors. Methods Twenty-two patients received Orthofix unilateral external fixator treatment for bone defect after tumor excision or complications after limb salvage surgery between June 2011 and March 2016. There were 11 males and 11 females with a median age of 23.5 years (range, 4-57 years). The bone defect or limb length discrepancy after tumor resection was at proximal femur in 6 cases, distal femur in 8 cases, diaphysis of femur in 3 cases, proximal tibia in 2 cases, and diaphysis of tibia in 3 cases. The external fixation was used for temporary fixation after reconstruction of bone defect in 10 cases [the length of bone defect was 6-19 cm (mean, 12.3 cm); using vascularized fibular graft in 2 cases, allograft bone and free fibular graft in 2 cases, allograft bone and autogenous bone graft in 5 cases, allograft bone reconstruction in 1 case]; bone distraction lengthening for limb length discrepancy in 5 cases [the length of shortening was 6.5-8.5 cm (mean, 7.5 cm)]; temporary fixation after open biopsy in 3 cases; bone transportation over locking plate in 1 case (the length of bone defect was 7.5 cm); fixation for preoperatively pathology fracture in 1 case; and joint distraction for dislocation after tumor ablation in 2 cases. Results All the patients were followed up 12-72 months (mean, 36 months). In 10 patients with bone defect reconstruction, the wearing external fixator time was 3-8 months (mean, 4.8 months); all got bone union with the healing time of 3-16 months (mean, 6.4 months); the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 93 (MSTS 93) score was 73.3-93.3 (mean, 87.2); and no complication occurred during wearing external fixator. In 5 patients with bone distraction lengthening for limb length discrepancy, the wearing external fixator time was 7-15 months; 2 patients had axial deviation during distraction and2 had greenstick fracture after apparatus removal; pin site infection was observed in 2 cases with grade 1 and 1 case with grade 2 according to Checketts-Otterburn classification system; the MSTS 93 score was 80.0-96.7 (mean, 89.2). The remaining patients had no complications, the knee and ankle joint movement was normal. Conclusion Orthofix unilateral external fixator can be used in fixation for complex bone defect after tumor resection and to correct limb length discrepancy after limb salvage surgery.