ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and find the mechanism of multidrug resistance. MethodsTwenty patients with gastric cancer and 31 patients with colorectal cancer underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and then operations. The preoperative specimens were stained by immunohistochemical techniques for testing p53,multidrug resistanceassociated protein (MRP), glutathione S transferase（GST）, telomerase. Resection specimens were evaluated for chemotherapy effect by routine histology; at the same time, the postoperative morbidity and mortality were observed. ResultsIn 51 patients, the response rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 27.45%(14/51),so multidrug resistance was a kind of common phenomena in gastrointestinal carcinomas. The postoperative morbidity was 15.69%(8/15), the main operation complication was infection,the mortality was 1.96%(1/51),only one person died from severe infection.The expression rate of p53, MRP, GST, telomerase was 58.0%,51.0%,66.7%,74.0%respectively, the location of p53 was at cell nucleus,location of MRP,GST was at cell memberane and cytoplasm,location of telomerase was at cytoplasm.The response rate had nothing to do with age, sex and metastasis. But it was related with p53 and telomerase expression. ConclusionNeoadjuvant chemotherapy is an effective, safe therapy. But the rate of drug resistance is high in gastrointestinal carcinomas, and the response rate is related to p53, telomerase expression.
Objective To investigate the impacts of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the expression of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) and on operation procedure and the significance of prognosis. Methods The expression of IGF-1R in 40 patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was measured by immunohistochemistry. The diagnosis was proved by core biopsy. All the patients took the TAC chemotherapy regimen. Modified radical operation was performed after two chemotherapy cycles and the IGF-1R expression was measured again. The clinical effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was assessed according to WHO criterion by measuring the size of tumor by physical examination and B type ultrasound. Results After neoadjuvant chemotherapy the tumor size shrank in 29 patients, there was no CR (complete response) or PD (progressed disease) to be documented. IGF-1R expression could be downregulated in 25 patients. Conclusion Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can inhibit the tumor growth by downregulation of the expression of IGF-1R.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of CTX, EADM, VCR, and Pred (CHOP) as preoperative regional intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy in primary gastric malignant lymphoma (PGML). MethodsForty-one patients with PGML underwent preoperative regionalarterial infusion chemotherapy. The regimen consisting of CTX 600 mg/m2, EADM 50 mg/m2, VCR 1.4 mg/m2, and Pred 60 mg/m2, was administrated 14－21 d before operation. Another 33 patients with similar PGML during the same period underwent surgery directly. The response of the tumor and chemotherapy toxicity were observed, together with the survival of the cases. ResultsAmong the 33 patients undergoing surgery directly, 24 cases (72.7%) had curative resection, the 5-year survival rate was 58.3% (14/24). All 41 patients of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group completed the planned regimen of chemotherapy and surgery successfully. The most common related adverse effects were grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ gastrointestinal discomfort (22 cases) and bone marrow suppression (14 cases). Thirtyseven cases (90.2%) underwent curative resection, the 5year survival rate was 67.7% (21/31). There was no significant difference between two groups in 5year survival rate (χ2=0.517， P＝0.471), while with significant difference in curative resection rate (P＝0.041). ConclusionsNeoadjuvant intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy (CHOP) has been wellrated; it appears to have improved the resectable rate of the PGML patients studied.
Objective To investigate the advances and clinical efficacy evaluation method on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer. Methods Literatures on the advances and clinical efficacy evaluation method on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer were reviewed and analyzed. The agreement between computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) and the results of histopathology and survival was analyzed.Results CT and EUS were the method of efficacy evaluation commonly used at present, but the evaluation indexes and criteria were controversial, and the criteria for solid tumors seemed to be not feasible for gastric cancer. Diffusionweighted imaging (DWI) method needed more investigation, while PET held advantage in early selection of patients without response accurately.Conclusion There is no uniform standard for clinical efficacy evaluation yet, so an integration of diverse imaging methods may be the best choice to improve the accuracy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of TEC and CEF regimen in preoperative chemotherapy for patients with breast cancer. MethodsA total of one hundred breast cancer patients undergoing preoperative chemotherapy were divided into TEC group (n=50) and CEF group (n=50) by the pairgroup method and received surgical therapy after three courses of chemotherapy. The efficacy and toxicity of preoperative chemotherapy of patients in two groups were analyzed. ResultsFour patients with stage ⅢB breast cancer quit from CEF group after two courses of treatment because of the worse satisfaction. Clinical complete remission (cCR) was 7 cases, clinic partial remission (cPR) was 34 cases, stable disease (SD) was 9 cases, therefore, the remission rate (RR) was 82.0% (41/50), and reduction rate of tumor was 64.0% (32/50) in TEC group. cCR was 2 cases, cPR was 32 cases, SD was 12 cases, thus the RR was 680% (34/50), and reduction rate of tumor was 40.0% (20/50) in CEF group. The clinical efficacy and reduction rate of tumor of patients in TEC group were significantly superior than those in CEF group (Plt;0.05). The negative conversion ratio of lymph nodes were 54.1% (20/37) and 57.1% (20/35) in TEC group and CEF group, which was not statistically different (Plt;0.05). The occurrence of hair loss and leukopenia of patients in TEC group were significantly higher than those in CEF group (Plt;0.05), while the differences in thrombocytopenia, low concentration of hemoglobin, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, cardiac toxicity, and neurotoxicity were not significant (Pgt;0.05). ConclusionTEC regimen is better than CEF regimen in the efficacy and safety of neo-adjuant therapy for patients with breast cancer, and well tolerated.
ObjectiveTo evaluate clinical effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with laparoscopic gastrectomy in treatment of local advanced gastric cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of 24 patients with local advanced gastric cancer undergoing 2 courses of FLEEOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy from July 2012 to July 2015 were analyzed. The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on radiographic results was evaluated. The gastrectomy was performed on week 2 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were treated with XELOX regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy after laparoscopic gastrectomy. Results① Complete response occurred in 4 cases (16.6%), partial response in 18 cases (75.0%), stable disease in 1 case (4.2%), disease progressive in 1 case (4.2%). The total effective rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 91.6% (22/24). ② The serum tumor markers CEA, CA19-9, and CA125 levels after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were significantly lower than those before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001) and reached normal levels. ③ Two courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and laparoscopic exploration were completed successfully in these 24 patients. Two patients with intraabdominal metastasis were underwent palliative gastrojejunostomy, the other 22 patients were underwent laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy. The operative time was (236±45) min, the intraoperative blood loss was (150±50) mL, the number of lymph node dissected was 17.4 ± 5.3, the postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery time was (3.1±0.8) d. ④ There was no death due to surgery. One case suffered anastomotic leakage, 1 case intestinal obstruction, and 1 case pulmonary infection after surgery. The postoperative complications were cured by conservative treatment. ⑤ The haematological adverse events included anemia (9 patients), leukopenia (14 patients), thrombocytopenia (8 patients), aminotransferase abnormality (5 in elevated ALT, 6 in elevated AST), the most common toxicity was nausea (19 patients), 10 patients suffered nerve toxicity. All the patients were relieved after treatment. ⑥ The patients were followed up for 4-39 months, 1 case died of cachexia as the result of extensive abdominal metastasis, 1 case died of liver failure as the result of multiple liver metastases, 1 case was death as the result of brain metastasis, 1 case was death as the result of the other cause, the other 20 patients were alive. ConclusionsThe preliminary results of limited cases in this study show that FLEEOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with laparoscopic gastrectomy for local advanced gastric cancer is safe and effective. It has advantages of minimal invasion and fast recovery.
Objectives To systematically review the efficacy and safety of TE regimen versus CEF regimen for Chinese women with ⅡA to ⅢC stage breast cancer. Methods Databases including PubMed, EMbase, VIP, CNKI, WanFang Data and CBM were electronically searched from inception to December 2016 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCT) on TE regimen versus CEF regimen for Chinese women with ⅡA to ⅢC stage breast cancer. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 14 RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: the complete remission rate (CR) (RR=1.73, 95%CI 1.35 to 2.22, P<0.000 1) and clinical efficacy rate (RR) (RR=1.31, 95%CI 1.22 to 1.42,P<0.000 01) of the TE group were superior to those of the CEF group. But there were no significant differences between two groups in cardiac toxicity, myelosuppression and gastrointestinal reactions. Conclusions TE regimen is superior to CEF regimen in terms of efficacy for the Chinese women with ⅡA to ⅢC stage breast cancer, and there is no difference between the incidence of adverse reactions. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo study the latest progress of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. MethodsLiteratures of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer, involving with theoretical basis, clinical significance, indications, drugs, predictors, and its relationship of breastconserving surgery, sentinel lymph node biopsy were reviewed. ResultsNeoadjuvant chemotherapy could reduce the clinical stage, increase opportunity of breast-conserving surgery, learn the sensitivity of drugs, prevent distant metastases, but the impact of the sentinel lymph node biopsy was still in dispute. ConclusionNeoadjuvant chemotherapy is an important part of a systemic treatment for breast cancer, but how to select sensitive drugs, develop individualized treatment programs and forecast the outcome needs further study.
Objective To explore the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on postoperative risk of colorectal cancer by use of estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress （E-PASS）. Methods A total of 161 patients with colorectal cancer according to the inclusion criteria from January 2009 to December 2009 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University were analyzed retrospectively，who were assigned to neoadjuvant chemotherapy group （NC group, 78 patients） and non-NC group （83 patients）. The postoperative risk of each group was assessed by the E-PASS scale including preoperative risk score （PRS），surgical stress score （SSS），and comprehensive risk score （CRS）. Results The baseline of two groups had no significant difference （P＞0.05）. The postoperative complication incidence of two groups had no significant difference either （P＞0.05）， which was 10.26% （8/78） in the NC group，and 7.23% （6/83） in the non-NC group. The PRS was 78.42 in the NC group and 83.42 in the non-NC group （P=0.497）. The SSS was 80.77 in the NC group and 81.22 in the non-NC group （P=0.951）. The CRS was 80.74 in the NC group and 81.24 in the non-NC group （P=0.976）. The accuracy of the postoperative risk assessment was 70 cases and 78 cases in the NC group and non-NC group，respectively. There was no significant difference of accuracy between two groups （P=0.325）. Conclusions Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not increase the risk of patients with colorectal cancer after operation，and the results suggest that E-PASS scale can provide a more accurate assessment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with surgical risk.
Objective To investigate the effect of FLEEOX regiment on nutritional status of advanced gastric cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods Forty-eight cases of advanced gastric cancer patients from December 2010 to October 2011 in this hospital were included into. The indexes of body composition and the blood related nutritional indicators before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were determined. Results After neoadjuvant chemotherapy，the body weight，intracellular fluid，body mass index，protein，body fat，body cell mass，and arm circumference mildly decreased；extracellular fluid，body water content，inorganic salts，bone mineral content，non-fat group，skeletal muscle，and arm muscle circumference mildly increased，but the differences were not statistically significant （P＞0.05）. The blood albumin，prealbumin，total protein，transferrin，and lymphocytes decreased at different degrees down，but the differences were not statistically significant （P＞0.05）. Conclusion Patients have no obvious changes in nutritional status during chemotherapy of FLEEOX regiment.