Objective To evaluate the efficiency and associated factors of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation( NPPV) in the treatment of acute lung injury( ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome( ARDS) .Methods Twenty-eight patients who fulfilled the criteria for ALI/ARDS were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized to receive either noninvasive positive pressure ventilation( NPPV group) or oxygen therapy through a Venturi mask( control group) . All patients were closely observed and evaluated during observation period in order to determine if the patients meet the preset intubation criteria and the associated risk factors. Results The success rate in avoiding intubation in the NPPV group was 66. 7%( 10/15) , which was significantly lower than that in the control group ( 33. 3% vs. 86. 4% , P = 0. 009) . However, there was no significant difference in the mortality between two groups( 7. 7% vs.27. 3% , P =0. 300) . The incidence rates of pulmonary bacteria infection and multiple organ damage were significantly lower in the NPPV success subgroup as compared with the NPPV failure group( 2 /10 vs. 4/5, P =0. 01;1 /10 vs. 3/5, P = 0. 03) . Correlation analysis showed that failure of NPPV was significantly associated with pulmonary bacterial infection and multiple organ damage( r=0. 58, P lt;0. 05; r =0. 53, P lt;0. 05) . Logistic stepwise regression analysis showed that pulmonary bacterial infection was an independent risk factor associated with failure of NPPV( r2 =0. 33, P =0. 024) . In the success subgroup, respiratory rate significantly decreased( 29 ±4 breaths /min vs. 33 ±5 breaths /min, P lt; 0. 05) and PaO2 /FiO2 significantly increased ( 191 ±63 mmHg vs. 147 ±55 mmHg, P lt;0. 05) at the time of 24 hours after NPPV treatment as compared with baseline. There were no significant change after NPPV treatment in heart rate, APACHEⅡ score, pH and PaCO2 ( all P gt;0. 05) . On the other hand in the failure subgroup, after 24 hours NPPV treatment, respiratory rate significantly increased( 40 ±3 breaths /min vs. 33 ±3 breaths /min, P lt;0. 05) and PaO2 /FiO2 showed a tendency to decline( 98 ±16 mmHg vs. 123 ±34 mmHg, P gt; 0. 05) . Conclusions In selected patients, NPPV is an effective and safe intervention for ALI/ARDS with improvement of pulmonary oxygenation and decrease of intubation rate. The results of current study support the use of NPPV in ALI/ARDS as the firstline choice of early intervention with mechanical ventilation.
Objective The risk factors of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) combined with failure of respiratory failure were identified by meta-analysis, so as to provide a basis for early clinical prevention and treatment failure and early intervention. Methods PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, VIP and CBM Data were searched to collect studies about risk factors about failure of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in AECOPD and respiratory failure published from January 2000 to January 2021. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, literature data extraction and quality assessment. Meta-analysis was performed on the final literature obtained using RevMan 5.3 software. Results Totally 19 studies involving 3418 patients were recruited. The statistically significant risk factors included Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHEⅡ) score, pre-treatment PCO2, pre-treatment pH, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), respiratory rate (RR) before treatment, body mass index (BMI), age, C-reactive protein (CRP), renal insufficiency, sputum disturbance, aspiration of vomit. Conclusions High APACHE-Ⅱ score, high PCO2 before treatment, low pH value before treatment, low GCS score, high RR before treatment, low BMI, advanced age, low albumin, high CRP, renal insufficiency, sputum disturbance, and vomit aspiration were the risk factors for failure of respiratory failure in patients with COPD treated by NIPPV. Failure of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in COPD patients with respiratory failure is affected by a variety of risk factors, and early identification and control of risk factors is particularly important to reduce the rate of treatment failure.
Objective To explore the effects of enteral tube feeding on moderate AECOPD patients who underwent noninvasive positive pressure ventilation ( NPPV) . Methods Sixty moderate AECOPD patients with NPPV admitted from January 2009 to April 2011 were recruited for the study. They were randomly divided into an enteral tube feeding group (n=30) received enteral tube feeding therapy, and an oral feeding group (n=30) received oral feeding therapy. Everyday nutrition intake and accumulative total nutrition intake in 7 days, plasma level of prealbumin and transferrin, success rate of weaning, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, rate of trachea cannula, and mortality rate in 28 days were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the oral feeding group, the everyday nutrition intake and accumulative total nutrition intake in 7 days obviously increased (Plt;0.05) , while the plasma prealbumin [ ( 258.4 ±16.5) mg/L vs. (146.7±21.6) mg/L] and transferrin [ ( 2.8 ±0.6) g/L vs. ( 1.7 ±0.3) g/L] also increased significantly after 7 days in the enteral tube feeding group( Plt;0.05) . The success rate of weaning ( 83.3% vs. 70.0%) , the duration of mechanical ventilation [ 5. 6( 3. 2-8. 6) days vs. 8. 4( 4. 1-12. 3) days] , the length of ICU stay [ 9. 2( 7. 4-11. 8) days vs. 13. 6( 8.3-17. 2) days] , the rate of trachea cannula ( 16. 6% vs. 30. 0% ) , the mortality rate in 28 days ( 3. 3% vs. 10. 0% ) all had significant differences between the enteral tube feeding group and the oral feeding group. Conclusions For moderate AECOPD patients with NPPV, enteral tube feeding can obviously improve the condition of nutrition and increase the success rate of weaning, shorten the mechanical ventilation time and the mean stay in ICU, decrease the rate of trachea cannula and mortality rate in 28 days. Thus enteral tube feeding should be preferred for moderate AECOPD patients with NPPV.
ObjectiveTo analyze the effect of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) on the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) combined with lung injury [acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)] in emergency treatment. MethodsFifty-six patients with SAP combined with ALI/ARDS treated between January 2013 and March 2015 were included in our study. Twenty-eight patients who underwent NPPV were designated as the treatment group, while the other 28 patients who did not undergo NPPV were regarded as the control group. Then, we observed patients' blood gas indexes before and three days after treatment. The hospital stay and mortality rate of the two groups were also compared. ResultsBefore treatment, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of pH value and arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) (P>0.05). Three days after treatment, blood pH value of the treatment group and the control group was 7.41±0.07 and 7.34±0.04, respectively, with a significant difference (P＜0.05); the PaO2 value was respectively (60.60±5.11) and (48.40±3.57) mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa), also with a significant difference (P＜0.05). The hospital stay of the treatment group and the control group was (18.22±3.07) and (23.47±3.55) days with a significant difference (P＜0.05); and the six-month mortality was 17% and 32% in the two groups without any significant difference (P>0.05). ConclusionIt is effective to treat patients with severe acute pancreatitis combined with acute lung injury in emergency by noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of goal directed analgesia on patients with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in the intensive care unit (ICU).MethodsThis was a retrospective study. Two hundred sixty-four patients requiring non-invasive positive pressure ventilation were enrolled in the ICU of this hospital, including 118 patients in the empirical analgesia group and 146 in the goal directed analgesia group. The empirical analgesia group was treated with remifentanil to analgesia and propofol, midazolam or dexmedetomidine to sedation. The sedative depth maintained <1 measured by the score of the Richmond restless sedative scale (RASS). The same analgesic and sedative drug were first used in the goal directed analgesia group to maintain the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool score <2, and the RASS score <1 was maintained after the analgesia depth were achieved. Whether the patients occurred delirium was assessed by the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU. The dosage of analgesic and sedative drugs, the dependability (based on the total ventilation time in the first 24 hours after ventilation), the incidence of delirium, the rate of invasive ventilation, the total time of NPPV and the length of stay of ICU were observed in the two groups.ResultsThere were no significant differences in age, sex, APACHEⅡ score, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, SpO2, arterial blood gas and the reason of NPPV between the two groups. The dosage of analgesic and sedative drugs in the goal directed analgesia group were less than the empirical analgesia group, and the dependability was higher than that of the empirical analgesia group ［(12.6±5.8)h vs. (10.9±4.8)h, P<0.05), and the incidence of delirium and the rate of invasive ventilation were also lower than those of the empirical analgesia group (15.8% vs. 25.4%, P<0.05; 32.9% vs. 44.9%, P<0.05). The total time of NPPV in the goal directed analgesia group was shorter than that of the empirical analgesia group ［(28.6±8.8)h vs. (37.3±10.7)h, P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the length of stay in ICU.ConclusionGoal directed analgesia can improve the dependability of NPPV patients, reduce the use of sedative drugs, and decrease the incidence of delirium and rate of invasive ventilation.
Objective To investigate the feasibility of dexmedetomidine hydrochloride in sedation practices during NPPV for patients with acute exacerbation of COPD ( AECOPD) and respiratory failure. Methods 50 patients with AECOPD and respiratory failure, admitted in ICU between January 2011 and April 2012, were divide into an observation group and a control group. All patients received conventional treatment and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation ( NPPV) . Meanwhile in the observation group, dexmedetomidine hydrochloride ( 1 μg/kg) was intravenously injected within 10 minutes, then maintained using a micropump by 0.1 ～0. 6 μg·kg- 1 ·h- 1 to maintaining Ramsay Sedation Scale ( RSS) score ranged from 2 to 4. The patients’compliance to NPPV treatment ( conversion rate to invasive ventilation) and ICU stay were compared between two groups. Heart rate,mean arterial pressure, respiratory rate, and arterial blood gas ( pH, PaO2 , PaCO2 ) before and 24 hours after treatment were also compared. Results After 24 hours treatment, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, respiratory rate, and arterial blood gas were all improved in two groups, while the improvements were more remarkable in the observation group. The conversion rate to invasive ventilation ( 4% vs. 16% ) and ICUstay [ ( 5.47 ±3.19) d vs. ( 8.78 ±3.45) d] were lower in the observation group than those in the control group. ( P lt;0.05) . Conclusion Dexmedetomidine hydrochloride may serve as a safe and effective sedative drug during NPPV in patients with AECOPD and respiratory failure.
Objective To investigate the effects of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) on patients with acute left heart failure. Methods Twenty patients with acute left heart failure diagnosed between September 2013 and July 2014 were randomized into treatment group (n=10) and control group (n=10). Both groups used conventional sedations, diuretics and drugs that strengthened the heart and dilated the vessels, while early use of NPPV was applied in the experimental group. Arterial blood gas analysis [pH value, pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2), and pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2)], heart rate (HR), respiration, duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay and invasive mechanical ventilation, duration of overall mechanical ventilation, and success case numbers before and two hours after treatment were observed and analyzed. Results For the control group, two hours after treatment, PaO2 was (67.0±8.5) mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa), HR was (124±10) times/min, Respiration was (34±4) times/min, the duration of ICU stay was (6.0±1.1) days, invasive ventilation was for (32.0±3.1) hours, and the total time of mechanical ventilation was (32.0±3.1) hours. Those indexes for the treatment group two hours after treatment were: PaO2, (82.3±8.9) mm Hg; HR, (98±11) times/min; respiration, (24±4) times/min; the duration of ICU stay, (4.0±0.8) days; invasive ventilation time, (16.0±1.3) hours; the total time of mechanical ventilation, (26.0±1.8) hours. All the differences for each index between the two groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion Early application of NPPV can rapidly relieve clinical symptoms and reduce the medical cost for patients with acute left heart failure.
Objective Sedation and/or analgesia is often applied during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) to make patients comfortable, and thus improve the synchronization between patients and ventilator. Nevertheless, the effect of sedation and/or analgesia on the clinical outcome of the patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) after extubation remains controversial. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on patients with AECOPD who received NIPPV after extubation in seven intensive care units in West China Hospital, Sichuan University between December 2013 and December 2017 . A logistic regression model was used to analyze the association between the use of sedation and/or analgesia and clinical outcomes including rate of NIPPV failure (defined as the need for reintubation and mechanical ventilation), hospital mortality, and length of intensive care unit stay after extubation. Results A total of 193 patients were included in the analysis, and 62 cases of these patients received sedation and/or analgesia during NIPPV. The usage of sedation and/or analgesia could result in failure of NIPPV (adjusted odd ratio [OR] 0.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02 - 0.52, P=0.006) and death (adjusted OR=0.13, 95%CI 0.04 - 0.42, P=0.001). Additionally, intensive care unit stay after extubation was longer in the patients who did not receive sedation and/or analgesia than those who did (11.02 d vs. 6.10 d, P< 0.01). Conclusion The usage of sedation and/or analgesia during NIPPV can decrease both the rate of NIPPV failure and hospital mortality in AECOPD patients after extubation.
ObjectiveTo explore the reason of failure in noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) for treatment of postoperative hypoxemia, in order to better guide use of NPPV after cardiac surgery. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 64 patients after heart surgery with undergoing NPPV treatment due to hypoxemia in our hospital between January 2012 and December 2013 year.There were 49 males and 15 females at age of 28 to 87 years. There were 17 patients with NPPV failure. The related factors for failure of NPPV were analyzed. ResultsFactors associated with failure of NPPV included smoking history, preoperative pulmonary function abnormalities, blood transfusion amount > 1 000 ml, simplified acute physiology score Ⅱ(SAPS Ⅱ) before NPPV > 35 points, oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) < 100 mm Hg before NPPV, PaO2/FiO2 < 150 mm Hg after NPPV treatment for 1 h, mechanical ventilation time > 72 h at the first time, and pneumonia (P < 0.05). The SAPS Ⅱ > 35 points before NPPV and pneumonia were the independent risk factors for NPPV treatment failure for postoperative hypoxemia. ConclusionPostoperative NPPV for heart disease should be according to the cause of low oxygen and severity. For patients with SAPS less than 35 points before NPPV or patients with pneumonia, NPPV should not be used. In the process of NPPV, if clinical effect is not satisfied, it should be converted to invasive ventilation immediately.
Objective To analyze the risk factors of treatment failure by noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) due to acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), and explore the best time that NPPV be replaced by invasive ventilation when NPPV failure occurs. Methods The data of patients with ARF due to AECOPD who were treated with NPPV from January 2013 to December 2015 were retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into two groups: the NPPV success group and the NPPV failure group (individuals who required endotracheal intubation or tracheotomy at any time). The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) Ⅱ score was analyzed; the Glasgow Coma Scale score, respiratory rate (RR), pH value, partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio, and partial pressure of carbon dioxide were also analyzed at admission, after 2 hours of NPPV, and after 24 hours of NPPV. Results A total of 185 patients with ARF due to AECOPD were included. NPPV failed in 35.1% of the patients (65/185). Multivariate analysis identified the following factors to be independently associated with NPPV failure: APACHEⅡscore≥30 [odds ratio (OR)=20.603, 95% confidence interval (CI) (5.309, 80.525), P<0.001], RR at admission≥35 per minute [OR=3.723, 95%CI (1.197, 11.037), P=0.020], pH value after 2 hours of NPPV<7.25 [OR=2.517, 95%CI (0.905, 7.028), P=0.070], PaO2 after 2 hours of NPPV<60 mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa) [OR=3.915, 95%CI (1.374, 11.508), P=0.010], and PaO2/FiO2 after 2 hours of NPPV<200 mm Hg [OR=4.024, 95%CI (1.542, 11.004), P=0.010]. Conclusion When patients with ARF due to AECOPD have a higher severity score, have a rapid RR at admission, or fail to improve in terms of pH and oxygenation after 2 hours of NPPV, the risk of NPPV failure is higher.