Objective To compare the effects of operative versus nonoperative treatment for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Methods All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of operative versus nonoperative treatment for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures were identified. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed by two reviewers independently. Results Four published trials involving 530 patients were included. All studies compared operative with nonoperative treatment. It was clear that operative treatment was superior to nonoperative treatment in terms of helping patients back to work, reducing problems wearing shoes, expanding the range of motion of subtalar joint, and improving the recovery of Bohler’s angle. As for foot pain, there was no difference between the two methods. Because the outcome measures varied across the trials, a meta-analysis could not be performed. Conclusions Both operative and nonoperative treatments produce comparable long-term outcomes in the treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Because of the poor reporting of outcomes, it is not possible to determine if there is any significant difference in outcome measures apart from those listed above. More trials with high methodological quality are needed.
ObjectiveTo study the application value of mixed formulations consisting of paraffin oil, dimethyl silicone oil, and senna preparations in treatment for incomplete adhesive intestinal obstruction after laparotomy. MethodsOne hundred and twentyeight patients diagnosed incomplete adhesive intestinal obstruction admitted to this hospital from March 2005 to May 2008 were randomly divided into trial group and control group. For the control group, the tradition therapy including fasting, gastrointestinal decompression, fluid replacement therapy, and enema with soap and water were used for treatment. For the trial group, the mixed formulations consisting of paraffin oil, dimethyl silicone oil, and senna preparations were injected into stomach by the nasogastric tube on the basis of traditional treatment used for the control group. Some indicators including the successful rate of nonoperative treatment, the time that obstructive symptoms resolved and returned to normal exhaust and defecation and normal diet, and recurrence rate were compared between two groups. ResultsThe successful rate of nonoperative treatmentin in the trial group were significantly higher than that in the control group 〔92.1% (70/76) versus 69.2% (36/52), Plt;0.01〕. The average time that recovered to normal exhaust and defecation in the trial group and the control group was 32.5 d and 47.8 d, respectively. The average time that recovered to normal diet in the trial group and the control group was 3.2 d and 5.3 d, respectively. The time that recovered to normal exhaust and defecation, and diet in the trial group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (Plt;0.01). The recurrence rate had no significant difference between two groups (Pgt;0.05). ConclusionThe mixed formulations consisting of paraffin oil, dimethyl silicone oil, and senna preparations improve recovery of intestinal function and reduce surgical intervention rate.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of operative treatment versus nonoperative treatment in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD).MethodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, and CQVIP databases were searched for controlled studies about operative treatment versus nonoperative treatment for ASD published up till June 2019. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for grey literatures informally published up till June 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literatures, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 14.0 softwares.ResultsA total of 10 non-randomized controlled studies were included, including 1 601 patients. The pooled results indicated that the operative group was superior to the nonoperative group in ability improvement [the increment of Scoliosis Research Society-22 score: weighted mean difference (WMD)=0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.69, 0.70), P<0.000 01; the decrement of Oswestry Disability Index score: WMD=11.12, 95%CI (10.74, 11.50), P<0.000 01], pain relief [the decrement of Numeric Rating Scale score: WMD=3.25, 95%CI (3.16, 3.35), P<0.000 01], and Cobb correction [WMD=14.06°, 95%CI (13.60, 14.53)°, P<0.000 01]. The incidence of complications was higher in the operative group than that in the nonoperative group [relative risk=5.38, 95%CI (3.67, 7.88), P<0.000 01].ConclusionsSurgery shows superior efficacy on ability improvement, pain relief, and Cobb correction compared with nonoperative treatment in ASD patients, though its incidence of complications is high. Nonoperative treatment is also an effective treatment for patients with poor physical condition and intolerance to surgery. Due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusions.