ObjectiveTo investigate the status of undernutrition, nutritional risk as well as nutritional support in patients with gastrointestinal tumor. MethodsIn this prospective cohort study, patients with gastrointestinal tumor were recruited from Septemper 2009 to June 2011. Patients were screened by using Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002) at admission. Data of the nutritional risk, application of nutritional support, complications, and tumor staging were collected. ResultsNine hundred and sixty-one patients with gastrointestinal tumor were recruited, the overall prevalence of nutritional risk was 38.9% (374/961) at admission, 49.2% （176/358） in gastric tumor and 32.8% （198/603） in colorectal tumor, respectively. The highest prevalence was found in stage Ⅳ gastric tumor 〔87.3% (48/55)〕 and colorectal tumor 〔58.8% (50/85)〕 while the lowest prevalence was found in stage ⅡA gastric tumor 〔16.1% (5/31)〕 and stageⅠcolorectal tumor 〔9.8% (6/61)〕. 62.3% (152/244) of gastric tumor patients with nutritional risk while 48.6% (144/296) without nutritional risk received nutritional support. 37.7% (92/244) of colorectal tumor patients with nutritional risk while 51.4% (152/296) without nutritional risk received nutritional support. The ratio of parental nutrition and enteral nutrition was 1.251. The rate of complications in the gastrointestinal tumor patients with nutritional risk was higher than that in the patients without nutritional risk 〔32.4% (121/374) versus 20.4% (120/587), P=0.000 0〕. For the gastrointestinal tumor patients with nutritional risk, the complication rate of the patients with nutritional support was significantly lower than that of the patients without nutritional support 〔27.5% (67/244) versus 40.8% (53/130), P=0.008 6〕. For the gas trointestinal tumor patients without nutritional risk, the complication rate of gastric tumor patients with nutritional support was significantly lower than that of the patients without nutritional support (P=0.039 6), while the complication rate was not significantly different in the colorectal tumor patients with nutritional support or not (P=0.464 7). ConclusionsPatient with gastrointestinal tumor has a high nutritional risk which is related to tumor staging. Patients with nutritional risk have more complications, and nutritional support is beneficial to the patients with nutritional risk by a lower complication rate.
【摘要】 目的 观察慢性心力衰竭营养支持治疗的疗效。 方法 将2007年1月〖CD3/5〗2009年10月期间收治的56例慢性心力衰竭住院患者随机分为常规治疗组及强化营养支持治疗组,每组28例患者。其中,强化治疗组是在常规治疗的基础上,给与强化营养支持治疗。比较两组治疗前后6 min步行距离、NYHA心功能评级及射血分数。 结果 治疗后,患者6 min步行距离、心功能评级强化营养治疗组优于常规治疗组。左心室射血分数两组无差异。 结论 对慢性心力衰竭患者,营养支持治疗是重要的治疗手段。【Abstract】 Objective To study the efficacy of nutritional support treatment for chronic heart failure. Methods 56 patients with chronic heart failure hospitalized patients were randomly divided into conventional therapy group and enhanced nutritional support therapy group, 28 patients in each group. Where enhenced therapy group is on the basis of conventional therapy to give extra enhanced intensive nutrition support treatment. Before and after treatment were compared sixminutes walking distance, NYHA cardiac function class, ejection fraction, mortality. Results After treatment, patients with sixminutes walking distance, cardiac function class,enhanced nutritional support therapy group is better than conventional treatment group. Left ventricular ejection fraction was no difference. Conclusion Patients with chronic heart failure, nutritional support treatment is an important treatment.
ObjectiveTo introduce the progresses and applications of nutritional status assessment in hospitalized patients. MethodsThe related literatures of nutritional status assessment were reviewed. ResultsThe rates of malnutrition and nutritional risk were high in hospitalized patients worldwide. Traditional nutrition assessment tools were not in common use in all hospitalized patients. All clinical health care workers should use the most suitable tool when faced with different patients. ConclusionAll hospitalized patients should be screened for nutritional risk on admission in order to improve clinical outcomes and reduce overall treatment costs.
ObjectiveTo investigate the nutritional risk, incidence of malnutrition, and clinical application of nutrition support in hospitalized patients with gastric cancer by the nutritional risk screening (NRS) 2002 score summary table. MethodsFrom June 2009 to February 2010, nutritional risk screen and application of clinical nutritional support were carried out in the hospitalized patients with gastric cancer in this hospital. Nutritional risk was assessed case-by-case according to the severity of illness, nutritional status 〔including body mass index (BMI), recent changes in body weight and eating〕 and patients age. NRS ≥3 was accepted as nutritionally at-risk, while NRS lt;3 no nutritional risk; BMI lt;18.5 kg/m2 (or albumin lt;30 g/L) combined with clinical conditions was judged to be malnourished. Results Three hundreds and eighty-six patients were included, 329 of which completed the NRS2002 screening. One hundred and sixty-five patients (50.15%) were at nutritional risk, while another 164 (49.85%) were no nutritional risk. Malnutrition was found in 57 patients (17.33%). By gender, male malnourished patients and nutritionally at-risk patients were accounting for 16.45% (38/231) and 48.05% (111/231) respectively, while female nutritionally at-risk patients and malnourished patients were accounting for 55.1% (54/98) and 19.39% (19/98) respectively, 72.04% (237/329) of the screened patients accepted clinical nutrition support, among which, 115 patients were at nutritional risk, accounting for 69.70% in that group, and 122 patients were no nutritional risk, accounting for 74.39% in that group. ConclusionsThe incidences of malnutrition and nutritionally at-risk in hospitalized gastric cancer patients are high. And irrationality of clinical nutrition support exists. Evidence-based guidelines are required to improve the nutritional status of support.
Objective To compare the clinical effects of early enteral and parenteral nutrition, and to study their effects on cytokine release, cellular immune function and protein metabolism in early postoperative patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Methods Thirty-six patients with gastrointestinal cancer were randomly divided into early postoperative enteral nutrition (EN) group (19 cases) and parenteral nutrition (PN) group (17 cases), and they were supported with EN or PN during postoperative period of 1-7 days, respectively. The levels of serum tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-10 (IL-10) were measured by ELISA. The total lymphocyte count (TLC) and subgroups of lymphocyte (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD4/CD8 and NK cell) were determined with flow cytometer. The urea and creatinine of the 24 h excretory urine were examined at four different phases: preoperative (pre), 1st d, 3rd d and 5th d after operation (pod). The clinical recovery indicators and the complication incidence were also observed. Results All the patients followed the project of nutritional support and relevant examinations, and there was no severe complication and no patient died during the research. The IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10, the 24 h urea and creatinine increased, while the serum TNF-α and TLC (except 3, 5 pod of EN group) decreased. There was no marked change of the proportion of lymphocyte subgroups after operation and there was no significant difference of the changes of IL-1β, IL-10 and TNF-α between the two groups as well. The levels of IL-6 (3, 5 pod), the 24 h urea (3, 5 pod) and creatinine (3, 5 pod) were significantly lower in EN group than those in PN group （P＜0.05）, whereas TLC (3, 5 pod) were significantly higher than that in EN group （P＜0.05）. In addition, the postoperative infection incidence （10.5% vs 35.3%）, fever duaration, rehabilitation time and medical cost were significantly lower in EN group than those in PN group （P＜0.05）.Conclusion The early postoperative EN has an advantage over PN in the patients with gastrointestinal cancer, which could decrease the release of cytokine and suppress protein metabolism resulting from operational stress, and could reduce the incidence of postoperative infection and inflammatory reaction time. They could also improve the cellular immune function and decrease the rebilitation duration and medical cost.
Objective To observe the effect of parenteral nutrition (PN) on the protein storage and immunofunction in patients with liver cirrhosis. Methods PN regimes consisted of nonprotein calories (NPC) 20-25 kcal/(kg·d) and nitrogen 0.15-0.20 g/(kg·d), the energy ratio of the glucose and fat emulsion was 2∶1. The PN solution was infused by total nutrition admixture (TNA), 12-16 hours per day for 7 days in 21 liver cirrhosis patients. Perior to the surgery and at 1st, 4th, 7th postoperative day, serum pre-Alb, transferrin (TSF), immunofunction (IgG, IgA, IgM, IgE, CH50, C3, C4, CD3, CD4, CD8, NKC), and nitrogen balance were tested. Results Serum pre-Alb, TSF, nitrogen balance and IgG, IgE, CH50, CD3, CD4, NKC were significantly decreased (Ｐ＜0.05), but the foregoing indices were higher than those of postoperative 1, 4d as compared with postoperative 7d. Conclusion These results bly indicated that postoperative nutritional support is safe and useful, and improve the patient’s nutritional status and immunofunction.
ObjectiveTo explore the role of nutritional support in adjuvant therapy for respiratory failure. MethodsWe took 72 patients with respiratory failure who were treated in our hospital from August 2011 to January 2013 as the research objects. They were divided into two groups:control group and trial group, with 36 patients in each group. The division of the groups was in accordance with the state food and drug administration clinical trial institution ethics committee standard operating procedures. In the control group, 36 patients were provided with regular treatments according to their condition, like maintaining the respiratory tract unobstructed, oxygen therapy, mechanical ventilation and anti-infection. In the trial group, we offered nutritional support in addition to the normal treatment. Consecutive 20 days was a course of treatment. After four courses, we inspected and put down two groups' respective clinical features, and made a contrast of their treatment conditions. We analyzed the treatments through observational indexes including assessment of eutrophication, treatment efficiency, pulmonary function and arterial blood gases. ResultsBoth groups had obvious therapeutic effects. The observational indexes in the trial group were better than those in the control group. The total effective rate was 91.7% in the trail group after treatment, significantly higher than that in the control group (66.7%) (χ2=8.692, P=0.003); the lung capacity, the ventilation flow ratio and arterial blood gas analysis values in the trial group was better than those in the control group. ConclusionThe effect of the nutritional support for the respiratory failure treatment is much better than the regular treatment. The total effective rate is improved while the death rate is lower than before and the patients recover quickly.
ObjectiveTo investigate the prevalence of the nutritional risks, the relationship between application of nutritional support and the clinical outcome of patients with gastrointestinal major surgery in the Frist People's Hospital of Shuangliu. MethodsGastrointestinal major surgery patients in Department of General Surgery in the Frist People's Hospital of Shuangliu from March 2010 to March 2014 were consecutively enrolled. Patients who provided informed consent were screened by NRS 2002, tracking nutrition support status and analysis the relationship between nutrition support and clinical outcome. In this study, the clinical outcome index included postoperative complications and hospitalization time. ResultsThere were totally 130 cases enrolled, 112 cases completed assessment by NRS 2002. The prevalence of nutritional risk was 75.9%(85/112), there were totally 57 patients(50.9%) received nutrition support, and all for parenteral nutrition. The prevalence of postoperative complication was 46.4%(52/112). The prevalence of postoperative complication in patients who had nutritional risk and received nutritional support was 41.7%(15/36), whereas, in patients who had nutritional risk but not received nutritional support was 73.5%(36/49), there was statistically significant difference between the 2 groups(P=0.002). In patients who not had nutritional risk, the postoperative complication rate was only 3.7%(1/27). ConclusionsBecause of noninvasive and easy to operate, NRS 2002 are adpted to hospitalized patients with gastrointestinal major surgery. Because of the specific of disease metabolism, the higher nutritional risk occurres in patients with gastrointestinal major surgery, appropriate nutritional support for this kinds of patients can reduce the incidence of postoperative complication, and improve the prognosis.
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of nutritional support with different proportion of fat on the prognosis of patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP). Methods Ninety SCAP patients with nutritional risk treated between January 2014 and July 2015 were randomized into high, normal, and low-proportion fat groups with 30 patients in each. The patients in different groups underwent nutritional support with different fat proportion besides the same medication. Data of albumin, pre-albumin and transferrin were collected and analyzed before treatment and 10 days after treatment. The mortality rates were compared between groups. Results Albumin, pre-albumin and transferrin were similar in all groups before intervention (P>0.05); albumin, pre-albumin and transferrin increased significantly 10 days after treatment in each group (P<0.05). Patients in the normal-fat group acquired significantly more obvious improvements on each index (P<0.05). A shorter length of stay in hospital was observed in the normal-proportion fat group compared with the high and low-proportion fat groups, but there was no significant differences among groups (P>0.05). On the 10th day, the normal -proportion fat proportion group had a significantly higher cure rate and a significantly lower mortality rate than the other two groups (P<0.05). The improvement rate was similar in all groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Supportive treatment with normal fat proportion has a promising value in the improvement of albumin, pre-albumin and transferrin for SCAP patients with a shorter length of stay in hospital, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is the treatment of choice for critically ill patients with hemodynamic instability who require renal replacement therapy. This review summarizes the impact of CRRT treatment on nutritional support in critically ill patients, including: energy increase caused by citrate-based anticoagulants, energy loss caused by glucose-free replacement fluid and dialysate, a large amount of amino acids loss in the effluent, and the influences on the way of lipid emulsion administration, capacity, electrolyte, vitamins, and trace elements. It is hoped that the intensive care unit doctors, nephrologists, and nutritionists can fully cooperate to determine the CRRT prescription and the nutritional support prescription.