Objective To compare the biomechanical stability of Kirschner wire and tension band wiring, reconstruction plate combined with tension band wiring, and olecranon anatomical plate in fixing proximal ulna combined with olecranon fracture, so as to provide the theoretical evidence for clinical selection of internal fixation. Methods Eight specimens of elbow joints and ligaments were taken from eight fresh male adult cadaveric elbows (aged 26-43 years, mean 34.8 years) donated voluntarily. The model of proximal ulna combined with olecranon fracture was made by an osteotomy in each specimen. Fracture end was fixed successively by Kirschner wire and tension band wiring (group A), reconstruction plate combined with tension band wiring (group B), and olecranon anatomical plate (group C), respectively. The biomechanical test was performed for monopodium compression experiments, and load-displacement curves were obtained. The stability of the fixation was evaluated according to the load value when the compression displacement of fracture segment was 2 mm. Results No Kirschner wire withdrawal, broken plate and screw, loosening and specimens destruction were observed. The load-displacement curves of 3 groups showed that the displacement increased gradually with increasing load, while the curve slope of groups B and C was significantly higher than that of group A. When the compression displacement was 2 mm, the load values of groups A, B, and C were (218.6 ± 66.9), (560.3 ± 116.1), and (577.2 ± 137.6) N, respectively; the load values of groups B and C were significantly higher than that of group A (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was observed between groups B and C (t=0.305, P=0.763). Conclusion The proximal ulna combined with olecranon fracture is unstable. Reconstruction plate combined with tension band wiring and olecranon anatomical plate can meet the requirement of fracture fixation, so they are favorable options for proximal ulna combined with olecranon fracture. Kirschner wire and tension band wiring is not a stable fixation, therefore, it should not be only used for proximal ulna combined with olecranon fracture.
Objective To review the efficacy of reconstruction plate combined with tension band wiring for treating proximal ulna and olecranon fractures. Methods Between November 2004 and September 2009, 10 patients with proximal ulna and olecranon fractures were treated by reconstruction plate combined with tension band wiring. There were 6 males and4 females with an average age of 45.3 years (range, 21-75 years). Five fractures were caused by traffic accident, 2 by fall ing from height, 2 by tumbl ing, and 1 by a machine strangulation. The locations were the left side and the right side in 5 cases respectively. One case was open fracture (Gustilo II) and the other 9 were closed fractures. Olecranon fractures included 4 cases of traverse fractures and 6 cases of comminuted fractures, and proximal ulna fractures included 6 cases of comminuted fractures and 4 cases of obl ique fractures. The combined fractures included 6 radial head fractures, 4 coronoid process fractures, 2 proximal humerus fractures, and 3 scapula fractures; other injury included 1 elbow dislocation and 1 shoulder dislocation. Two patients had secondary operation; the other 8 patients received the primary operations and the time from injury to operation varied from 7 days to 20 days, with an average of 11 days. Results One case had infection at the incision 1 week after operation, and recovered after 2 months of antibiotics and debridement; incisions healed by first intention in other 9 patients. All patients were followed up 12-64 months (mean, 40.5 months). The X-ray films showed that fracture heal ing was achieved at 10-24 weeks (mean, 12 weeks). There was no ulnar nerve symptom in all cases. Heterotopic ossification occurred in 1 case at 2 months and stiffness of the elbow in 1 case at 3 months after operation; they were both cured after symptomatic treatment. Proximal migration of Kirschner wires was found in 1 case at 6 months after operation, whose implants were taken out at 9 months after the first operation because fracture had healed. At last follow-up, the flexion and extension arc of the elbow averaged 92.8°(range, 23-130°), and the arc of forearm rotation averaged 124.4° (range, 42-175°). According to the American Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) evaluation method, the results were classified as excellent in 6 cases, good in 2, fair in 1, and poor in 1. Conclusion Treating proximal ulna and olecranon fractures by reconstruction plate combined with tension band wiring allows patients to do postoperative exercise early and could effectively avoid compl ications.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of sharp teeth hook plate by cutting for the treatment of olecranon fractures by comparison with Kirschner wire tension belt and locking plate. MethodsBetween January 2011 and April 2015, 32 cases of olecranon fractures were treated. Fracture was fixed with sharp teeth hook plate by cutting in 12 cases (trial group) and with Kirschner wire tension belt or locking plate in 20 cases (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, side and type of fracture, and time from injury to operation between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The healing time of fractures and complications were recorded. At 1 year after operation, the subjective function results were evaluated according to Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and objective function results by Mayo Elbow Score (MEPS); visual analogue scale (VAS) was used for elbow joint pain, and range of motion of flexion and extension of elbow joint was measured. ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention, with no vascular and nerve injuries. All patients were followed up 12-36 months with an average of 18 months. All fractures healed, and there was no significant difference in the healing time between 2 groups (P > 0.05). Loosening of Kirschner wire occurred in 2 cases of control group, but no loosening of internal fixation was observed in trial group after operation. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The DASH, MEPS, VAS score, and range of motion of flexion in trial group were superior to those in control group, showing significant differences (P < 0.05) at 1 year after operation. There was no significant difference in range of motion of extension between 2 groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionSharp teeth hook plate for treatment of olecranon fractures overcomes the shortcomings that Kirschner wire tension is easy to slide and locking plate has a compression effect on triceps tendon, so it has good effectiveness.