Abstract: Objective To compare the therapeutic effects between offpump coronary artery bypass grafting (off-pump CABG) and onpump coronary artery bypass grafting (on-pump CABG) in the patients of multivessel coronary disease below 70 years old, in order to decide on the best surgery method. Methods From June 2007 to June 2009, 196 patients below the age of 70 underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), including 152 male patients and 44 female patients. The average age was 55.00 years old, ranging from 46 to 69 years. The patients were divided into two groups according to the methods of operation. There were 94 patients in the off-pump CABG group including 2 patients who were converted to the onpump CABG surgery because of the unstable hemodynamics. The other 102 patients were in the onpump CABG group. The type and number of the vessel grafts, the quantity of blood transfusion, intubation duration, length of stay in hospital, complications during perioperative period and mortality were compared between the two groups. Results In the offpump CABG group, 2 patients were converted to onpump CABG surgery because of the unstable hemodynamics, and 1 of them died from multiple organ failure. In the onpump CABG group, 2 patients died from severe low output syndrome and sudden heart arrest respectively. No significant difference was found in the vessel grafting materials, perioperative complications and mortality between the two groups (Pgt;0.05), while the number of anastomosis (3.22±0.65 vs. 4.52±1.11, t=9.807, P=0.000), the [CM(159mm]quantity of blood transfusion (312.57±305.26 ml vs. 744.86±279.37 ml, t=10.317, P=0.000),the intubation duration (10.71±5.32 h vs.17.12±4.67 h, t=8.683, P=0.000) and the length of stay in hospital (17.75±3.04 d vs. 21.24±6.46 d, t=4.782,P=0.000) in the off-pump CABG group were significantly lower or shorter than those in the on-pump CABG group. A total of 93 patients in the off-pump CABG group and 100 patients in the on-pump CABG group were followed up with the time periods ranging from 2 to 26 months. All patients survived without angina. Conclusion There is no significant difference in the early clinical therapeutic effects between off-pump CABG and onpump CABG in the patients of multivessel coronary disease below 70 years old, but revascularization in the on-pump CABG patients is better. So far, offpump CABG cannot replace on-pump CABG and more clinical trails are needed for evaluation of the longterm prognosis.
Objective To compare the clinic results between offpump left ventricular(LV) aneurysm plication repair and onpump LV linear aneurysmectomy for LV dyskinetic aneurysm (DA), and to improve the curative effect of aneurysm. [WTHZ]Methods From September 2003 to September 2007, 32 patients with DA located in the anterior wall or apex of LV were operated. There were 23 male and 9 female aged 4670 years with a mean age of 63 years. According to the procedure with or without cardiopulmonary bypass(CPB), 32 patients were divided into two groups: Offpump group (n=17), with the size of DA represented 25%-37% of left cavity. Patients in this group underwent offpump LV aneurysm plication repair; Onpump group (n=15), with the size of DA represented 27%-40% of left cavity. Patients in this group underwent onpump LV linear aneurysmectomy. Coronary artery bypass grafting was the concomitant procedure in both groups. The clinic results were compared and evaluated via indexes such as left ventricular volume, systolic function etc which were determined by echocardiography. [WTHZ]Results No operation death was found in both groups. In offpump group, there was no perioperative complication. Postoperative cardiac function classification (NYHA) improved significantly (1.0±0.8 grade vs. 2.9±0.3 grade，P=0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction（LVEF） improved significantly (41.0%±4.5% vs. 36.4%±4.8%，P=0.035), and left ventricular [CM(159mm]endsystolic volume index (LVESVI) reduced significantly (52.6±27.7 ml/m2 vs. 79.7±21.4 ml/m2, P=0.003) compared with that before operation. Seventeen cases were followed up, and the followup time was 12-53 months with a mean time of 29 months. No death was found during following up. One case was reoperated 1 year after operation because of severe mitral valve regurgitation. One case had congestive heart failure 3 years after operation with a LVEF of 31% and still in observation. The other cases were fine. In onpump group, there were 3 cases had perioperative complications (Two with neurological complications and one with respiratory failure). Postoperative cardiac function classification (NYHA) improved significantly (1.0±0.6 grade vs. 3.1±0.9 grade，P=0.001). LVEF improved significantly (42.3%±3.2% vs. 35.6%±6.5%, P=0.023). LVESVI reduced obviously (49.3±22.6 ml/m2 vs. 81.3±25.0 ml/m2, P=0.003) compared with that before operation. Fifteen cases were followed up and the followup time was 1260 months with a mean time of 35 months. No death was found during following up and the clinic results were good. No significant difference was observed between the two groups (Pgt;0.05). [WTHZ]Conclusion Offpump LV aneurysm plication repair for LV dyskinetic aneurysm can effectively reduce the volume of LV, improve LVEF and cause less perioperative complications. It is a safe and effective procedure. Its longterm prognosis needs further observation.