ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of “noncycloplegic retinoscopy for screening myopia + subsequent wearing orthokeratology lens” process for primary and secondary school students based on physical examination center.MethodsA total of 172 primary and secondary school students undergoing vision examination in the Health Management Department (i.e. physical examination center) of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University between January 2017 and December 2018 were selected as the research objects. After examination by noncycloplegic retinoscopy in the health management department, they were examined by mydriatic retinoscopy in the ophthalmology department, and then the consistency of the results of the two methods was analyzed. Then 93 students with myopia diagnosed by both methods were randomly divided into control group (n=46) and trial group (n=47), wearing frame glasses and orthokeratology lenses respectively. The diopter, eye axial length, corneal curvature and vitreous cavity depth before wearing glasses, as well as the increment of the above indicators at 3, 6 and 12 months after wearing glasses/lenses were compared between the two groups, and the incidence of complications of the two groups were compared.ResultsCompared with mydriatic retinoscopy, the positive predictive value of noncycloplegic retinoscopy was 88.6%, the sensitivity was 96.9% and the specificity was 84.2%, and the consistency kappa coefficient was 0.821 (P<0.001). Before wearing glasses/lenses, there was no significant difference in diopter, eye axial length, corneal curvature or vitreous cavity depth of both eyes between the two groups (P>0.05); at 3, 6 and 12 months after wearing glasses/lenses, the diopter increment and eye axial increment of both eyes of the trial group were less than those of the control group [left eye diopter increment: (0.48±0.07) vs. (0.73±0.08) D, (0.69±0.13) vs. (1.04±0.11) D, (0.88±0.11) vs. (1.13±0.11) D; left eye axial increment: (0.18±0.05) vs. (0.26±0.04)mm, (0.22±0.04) vs. (0.36±0.04) mm, (0.27±0.05) vs. (0.40±0.05) mm; right eye diopter increment: (0.46±0.10) vs. (0.73±0.09) D, (0.71±0.12) vs. (1.04±0.10) D, (0.90±0.10) vs. (1.17±0.11) D; right eye axial increment: (0.17±0.04) vs. (0.24±0.04) mm, (0.23±0.04) vs. (0.37±0.04) mm, (0.26±0.05) vs. (0.42±0.05) mm] (P<0.05). At 3, 6 and 12 months after wearing glasses/lenses, the changing trends of corneal curvature and vitreous cavity depth in both eyes of the trial group were different from those of the control group (PInteraction<0.05), and the corneal curvature of both eyes at each time point was lower than that before wearing lenses and that of the control group (P<0.05), while the vitreous cavity depth of both eyes was not statistically different from that before wearing lenses (P>0.05) but lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of common complications between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionIn the physical examination center, the accuracy of noncycloplegic retinoscopy for general survey of myopia in primary and secondary school students is high, and then after the diagnosis by mydriatic retinoscopy in the special department, the use of orthokeratology lens can effectively control the progress of myopia, so the process of “noncycloplegic retinoscopy for screening myopia in physical examination center + subsequent wearing orthokeratology lens in specialty” is feasible.