Objective To review the research progress of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and the liability of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Methods Recent literature concerning BMP and the liability of OPLL was reviewed, analysed, and summarized. Results The single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of BMP gene may produce a minor cumulative effect and increase individual susceptibility to OPLL. A variety of environmental factors can promote the occurrence and development of OPLL by increasing the expression of BMP gene. Conclusion The SNPs of BMP gene may increase individual susceptibility to OPLL. However, interaction of cumulative effect of the SNPs and environmental factors can promote the liability to OPLL.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of the anterior and posterior approach for the treatment in ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) of the cervical spine.MethodsAn electronical search was conducted in PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, WanFang Data and CNKI from inception to December 2016 to collect studies which compared the anterior cervical approach with posterior approach for OPLL. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk bias of included studies and then RevMan 5.3 software was used to perform meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 20 studies involving 1 263 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with the posterior approach group, the anterior approach group had higher postoperative JOA score (MD=0.98, 95%CI 0.52 to 1.44, P<0.000 1), higher improvement (MD=12.18, 95% CI 6.65 to 17.71, P<0.000 1), higher re-operation rate (OR=3.21, 95%CI 1.70 to 6.08, P=0.000 3), longer operation time (MD=53.43, 95%CI 12.77 to 94.09, P=0.01) and more bleeding (MD=122.88, 95%CI 39.56 to 206.20, P=0.004), respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between two groups (OR=1.49, 95%CI 0.88 to 2.51, P=0.14).ConclusionThe anterior approach for the treatment in OPLL of the cervical spine can achieve better postoperative neurological improvement and lower neurological deterioration, while the posterior approach for the treatment in OPLL has lower re-operation rate, less blood loss and shorter operation time. The incidence of complications between two groups is similar. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
Objective To investigate an individualized treatment program of a patient with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy by the method of evidence-based medicine. Methods One patient with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy was admitted into West China Hospital on October 19th, 2015. After evaluating the patient’s condition adequately, we proposed the problem according to the " patient, intervention, control, and outcome” (PICO) principles. Then, we searched and evaluated the systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies from Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Embase, PubMed, OVID ACP Journal Club, CNKI, Wanfang and so on. The search date was from January 1991 to December 2015. And the best evidences from the databases were utilized in clinical practice. Results Twelve studies (five systematic reviews, two RCTs, four cohort studies and one latest guideline) were listed. To patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), posterior laminoplasty was less traumatic and had less complication. Expansive open-door laminoplasty was better. And the use of mini-plate fixation also reduced the related complications. Conclusions Posterior expansive open-door laminoplasty with mini-plate fixation has less traumatic and complication incidence, which can treat multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy effectively. For the best results and avoiding adverse outcomes, the procedure should be preferred in patients with OPLL.
Objective To investigate the microscope-assisted anterior cervical surgery and traditional open surgery for the treatment of cervical myelopathy with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Methods Retrospective selection of patients with OPLL who underwent microscope-assisted and traditional open anterior cervical surgery in West China (Airport) Hospital Sichuan University were selected between January 2016 and August 2020. The patients who underwent traditional open anterior cervical surgery between January 2016 and August 2018 were classified as the conventional group, and the patients who underwent microscope-assisted anterior cervical surgery between September 2018 and August 2020 were classified as the microscope group. The baseline characteristics, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of pain before and after surgery, and surgical complications were collected. Neurological function was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Result A total of 46 patients were included. There were 24 cases in the conventional group and 22 cases in the microscope group. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay in the microscope group were lower than those in the conventional group (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in VSA score and JOA score between the two groups before operation (P>0.05). There were statistically significant differences in VAS score and JOA score between the two groups 18 months after operation (P<0.001). The comparison of VAS score and JOA score in the two groups before and after operation showed that there was a statistically significant difference between 18 months after operation and before operation (P<0.05). In the microscope group, the average improvement rate of neurological function [(79.90±16.67)% vs. (58.12±17.47)%, t=4.317, P<0.001], excellent and good rate [95.45% (21/22) vs. 66.67% (16/24), χ2=4.354, P=0.037] were higher than those in the conventional group. The total number of complications in the microscope group was lower than that in the conventional group (P=0.024). Conclusion Compared with the traditional open anterior cervical surgery, the microscope-assisted anterior cervical surgery for OPLL can reduce intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.
Objective To evaluate the application of surgical strategies for the treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) involving the C2 segment. Methods The literature about the surgery for cervical OPLL involving C2 segment was reviewed, and the indications, advantages, and disadvantages of surgery were summarized. Results For cervical OPLL involving the C2 segments, laminectomy is suitable for patients with OPLL involving multiple segments, often combined with screw fixation, and has the advantages of adequate decompression and restoration of cervical curvature, with the disadvantages of loss of cervical fixed segmental mobility. Canal-expansive laminoplasty is suitable for patients with positive K-line and has the advantages of simple operation and preservation of cervical segmental mobility, and the disadvantages include progression of ossification, axial symptoms, and fracture of the portal axis. Dome-like laminoplasty is suitable for patients without kyphosis/cervical instability and with negative R-line, and can reduce the occurrence of axial symptoms, with the disadvantage of limited decompression. The Shelter technique is suitable for patients with single/double segments and canal encroachment >50% and allows for direct decompression, but is technically demanding and involves risk of dural tear and nerve injury. Double-dome laminoplasty is suitable for patients without kyphosis/cervical instability. Its advantages are the reduction of damage to the cervical semispinal muscles and attachment points and maintenance of cervical curvature, but there is progress in postoperative ossification. Conclusion OPLL involving the C2 segment is a complex subtype of cervical OPLL, which is mainly treated through posterior surgery. However, the degree of spinal cord floatation is limited, and with the progress of ossification, the long-term effectiveness is poor. More research is needed to address the etiology of OPLL and to establish a systematic treatment strategy for cervical OPLL involving the C2 segment.