Medical institutions, the last defense line for the medical treatment of coronavirus disease 2019, are crucial to avoid cross-infection in hospitals. And how to reasonably arrange patient visits and achieve early detection, early reporting, early isolation, and early treatment of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 and suspected cases at the same time is an important proposition. After the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019, West China Hospital of Sichuan University continued to supplement and improve implementation details based on the three-level pre-examination and triage of infectious diseases, and established a three-level pre-inspection and triage management mechanism more suitable for coronavirus disease 2019, and successfully applied it. This article introduces the process and results of this outpatient three-level pre-examination and triage management optimization practice, aiming to provide an experience reference for the outpatient three-level pre-examination and triage in medical institutions.
Objective To verify the reliability and validity of a self-developed satisfaction evaluation questionnaire for outpatient department employees in public hospitals, and to provide suitable tools for conducting such surveys. Methods Two anonymous surveys were conducted on all employees of the Outpatient Department of West China Hospital of Sichuan University in July 2019 and November 2021, respectively. Questionnaire items were screened using methods such as item distribution, coefficient of variation, and decision value, and the reliability and validity of the questionnaire were evaluated using Spearman-Brown coefficient and Cronbach’s α coefficient, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. Results The final questionnaire retained 14 items, which could be divided into two dimensions: work conditions and interpersonal environment, and the overall fit index of structural equation model model were as follows: χ2/ν=6.957, standardized root mean square residual was 0.061, root mean square error of approximation was 0.147, goodness-of-fit index was 0.796, adjusted goodness-of-fit index was 0.719, normed fit index was 0.849, relative fit index as 0.819, incremental fit index was 0.868, Tucker-Lewis Index was 0.841, comparative fit index was 0.867. The combined reliability of the two factors in the questionnaire was 0.94 and 0.91, respectively. The average variance extraction was 0.67 and 0.76, respectively, and the square root of the average variance extraction was 0.82 and 0.87, both of which were greater than the correlation coefficient of 0.71 between the two factors. The Spearman-Brown coefficient of the final questionnaire was 0.913, and the Cronbach’s α coefficients for the overall and two dimensions were 0.953, 0.937, and 0.910, respectively. Conclusion The reliability and validity of the satisfaction evaluation questionnaire for outpatient department employees in public hospitals are good and can be applied to practical surveys.