Objective To assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of paclitaxel liposomes and carboplatin for ovarian cancer. Methods The databases such as The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI and CBM were searched to collect all randomized control trials (RCTs) about the clinical effectiveness and safety of paclitaxel liposomes and carboplatin for ovarian cancer. Literatures were screened according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria, the data were extracted, the methodological quality of the included studies was assessed in line with Cochrane Handbook 5.0.1, and Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.0.24 software. Results Three RCTs involving 214 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that compared with the paclitaxel plus carboplatin group, the paclitaxel liposomes plus carboplatin group didn’t show significant differences in the total effective rate (P=0.62), while it was obviously superior in reducing the adverse events, such as muscle and joint pain (Plt;0.000 01), peripheral neurotoxicity (P=0.04), nausea or vomiting (P=0.000 2), facial blushing (P=0.03) and rashes (P=0.003). But there were no significant differences between the two groups in trichomadesis, dyspnea, diarrhea, bellyache and blood system abnormalities. Conclusion As current clinical evidences shows, the paclitaxel liposomes and carboplatin in treating ovarian cancer is as effective as the paclitaxel and carboplatin, and it can reduce some of the adverse reactions. Therefore, the paclitaxel liposomes and carboplatin is available for ovarian cancer as a new, safe and effective treatment. Due to small scale and low quality of the included studies, this conclusion has to be further proved with more high-quality, large-scale, and double-blind RCTs.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and the adverse reactions of intensive therapy compared with conventional therapy. Methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 3, 2008), MEDLINE (January 1980 to June 2008), EMbase (1984 to June 2008), CBM-disc (January 1980 to June 2008) and CNKI (1994 to June 2008) to get all the randomized control trials (RCTs) about paclitaxel intensive versus conventional therapy for ovarian cancer. We used RevMan 5 to perform meta-analysis. Results Six RCTs involving 572 patients were included. Metaanalysis showed the efficacy of intensive therapy and conventional therapy was similar. There were no significant differences in response rate (RR 1.06, 95%CI 0.94 to 1.20), median survival time, survival rate, median progression free survival and median time to progression between the two groups. When taking safety into consideration, intensive therapy significantly reduced the occurrence of grade Ⅲ or higher neutropenia (RR 0.49, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.69, Plt;0.000 1) and Grade Ⅲ or higher neuropathy (RR 0.43, 95%CI 0.24 to 0.78, P=0.006). But there were no significant differences between intensive therapy and conventional therapy in flush, grade Ⅲ or higher vomiting, anemia, leucopenia, grade Ⅲ or higher thrombocytopenia and alopecia. Conclusion Paclitaxel intensive therapy has similar efficacy and adverse reactions compared with conventional therapy in ovarian cancer. Above all, intensive therapy can reduce the incidence of grade Ⅲ or higher neutropenia and neuropathy. It is a good substitution for the conventional therapy.
Objective To systematically assess literature regarding the relationship between ovulation induction and the risk of ovarian cancer. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM and CNKI (from inception to Feb, 2012). Cohort or case-control studies were identified according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then the quality of the included studies was assessed, and the data was extracted. Meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.0 software. The incorporated RR (relative risk) and 95%CI (confidence interval) of the included cohort studies and incorporated OR (odds ratio) and 95%CI of case-control studies were calculated, respectively. Results Four cohort studies and four case-control studies were included. Result of meta-analysis on cohort studies showed ovulation induction didn’t increase the risk of ovarian cancer (RR=1.07, 95%CI 0.81 to 1.42, P=0.63). Besides, result of meta-analysis on case-control studies showed ovulation induction was not associated with the incidence of ovarian cancer (OR=1.28, 95%CI 0.78 to 2.08, P=0.33). But the risk of borderline ovarian tumors increased when compared with general population controls (OR=1.71, 95%CI 1.05 to 2.79, P=0.03). Conclusion Ovulation induction does not increase the risk of ovarian cancer, but may relate to the incidence of borderline ovarian cancer. However, more high-quality studies, especially perspective cohort studies are required because of the limited quantity of the included studies.
Objective To make an individualized therapeutic regimen for a patient with stage III relapsed ovarian cancer guided by evidence-based medicine.Methods According to the clinical problems this patient showed and the PICO (patient, intervention, comparison and outcome) principle, the best clinical evidence associated with relapsed ovarian cancer was retrieved and evaluated. Results The current evidence showed that the relapsed ovarian cancer with platinum resistance tended to be treated by pharmacotherapy. Consequently, on the basis of combining the recommended guidelines, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews or meta-analyses on RCTs, clinical experience from doctors and willingness of patient, the regimen of Irinotecan plus Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin for interventional chemotherapy was recommended for this patient. After three courses of the treatment, the disease got some relieved; the medical team would like to keep conducting the same regimen for another six to eight courses, and the follow-up visit was undergoing. Conclusion For patients with relapsed ovarian cancer with platinum resistance, an individualized therapeutic regimen under the guidance of evidence-based methods can not only improve the therapeutic efficacy but also guide both doctors and patients to take the indeterminate risk of medicine.
ObjectiveTo analyze the reasons for misdiagnosis of gastrointestinal metastatic ovarian cancer, in order to increase the rate of correct diagnosis and treatment, and to investigate the prognostic factors. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical features, pathological features and prognostic factors of 43 cases of metastatic ovarian carcinoma from gastrointestinal tract treated between 2004 and 2014. ResultsGastrointestinal metastatic ovarian cancer was characterized by the diversity of clinical manifestations and lack of specific symptoms. The common initial symptom was pelvic mass, frequently accompanied with gastrointestinal symptoms of ascites, anemia or weight loss, abdominal pain, bloating, gastrointestinal obstruction and bleeding. Signs and symptoms of primary and secondary tumor sites often coexisted with each other, leading to misdiagnosis. Univariate analysis showed that primary site, histological type, surgical treatment, the residual tumor debulking size, lymph node metastasis, tumor invasion and standard chemotherapy had significant impacts on the prognosis (P < 0.05). ConclusionsGastrointestinal metastatic ovarian cancer occurs in premenopausal women, often with ascites, abdominal pelvic masses as the first symptom. Primary tumor site is often ignored, and the initial correct diagnosis rate is low. Metastasis from stomach cancer is the most common, followed by colorectal cancer and esophageal cancer. Prognosis is correlated with the primary site, histological type, degree of differentiation, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis and other factors. Radical surgery and chemotherapy can improve survival.
ObjectiveTo systematiclly review the correlation between physical activity and the risk of ovarian cancer. MethodsSuch databases as CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, The Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2013), PubMed, EMbase were searched from database establishment to October 2013 to collect prospective cohort studies about physical activities and the risk of ovarian cancer. Relevant magazines and references of included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 8 cohort studies involving 580 581 subjects, of which there were 2 444 cases of patients with ovarian cancer. The results of meta-analysis showed that, women who participated in moderate level physical activities tended to have a lower incidence of ovarian cancer, compared with those who participated in low level physical activities (age-adjusted:RR=0.87, 95%CI 0.75 to 1.01, P=0.06; multivariate-adjusted:RR=0.97, 95%CI 0.83 to 1.14, P=0.71) but with no significant difference; while women who participated in high level physical activities tended to have a higher incidence of ovarian cancer with a significant difference found in the multivariate-adjusted results (age-adjusted:RR=1.19, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.56, P=0.21; multivariate-adjusted:RR=1.35, 95%CI 1.08 to 1.67, P=0.008). Along with the increase of sedentariness, the incidence of ovarian cancer rose, but with no significant difference. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that, compared with low level physical activities, high level ones increase the risk of ovarian caner; while the effects of moderate level ones and sedentariness on the risk of ovarian caner still remain uncertain. However, more high-quality studies are required to verify the conclusion of this study because of the limited quantity of the included studies as well as many confounding factors.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness and safety of intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy (IHPC) for ovarian cancer, so as to provide references for clinical practice and studies. MethodsWe electronically searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 6, 2013), Web of Science, WanFang Data, CBM, VIP and CNKI for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about IHPC vs. intravenous chemotherapy (IC) for ovarian cancer from the inception of the databases to June 2013. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsA total of 10 RCTs involving 723 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the IHPC group was superior to the IC group in clinical efficiency (OR=4.02, 95%CI 2.85 to 5.68, P < 0.000 01), clinical benefit response (OR=3.41, 95%CI 2.13 to 5.45, P < 0.000 01), recurrence and metastasis rates (OR=0.29, 95%CI 0.20 to 0.42, P < 0.000 1), and overall survival rates (OR=3.30, 95%CI 1.82 to 5.99, P < 0.000 1). In the aspect of safety, no significant difference was found in bone marrow suppression, hemoglobin reduction, nausea and vomiting between two groups. ConclusionIHPC for ovarian cancer can improve clinical efficiency, clinical benefit response and overall survival rates, and reduce recurrence and metastasis rates; and it is also safe for patients.
Objective To estimate the diagnostic value of mesothelin in ovarian cancer. Methods PubMed, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data databases were searched from inception to October 2016 to collect relevant diagnostic accuracy studies of mesothelin in ovarian cancer. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Statistical analysis was performed using Meta-Disc 1.4, Stata 12.0 and RevMan 5.2 softwares. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated, the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) was drawn and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Results Seventeen studies involving 2 052 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR were 0.63 (95%CI 0.60 to 0.67), 0.92 (95%CI 0.90 to 0.93) and 26.62 (95%CI 14.96 to 47.38), respectively. The AUC and Q index were 0.915 1 and 0.847 8, respectively. Conclusion The current evidence indicates that mesothelin has high specificity and low sensitivity, which can’t be used alone as a biomarker for the detection of ovarian cancer, but should be combined with other biomarkers.
Objective To investigate the effects and underlying mechanisms of human pituitary tumor-transforming gene 1 (hPTTG1) small interfering RNA (siRNA) on apoptosis of ovarian cancer cell line A2780. Methods hPTTG1 siRNA was transfected into A2780 with lipofectamine (the hPTTG1 siRNA group), and the normal group and the negative control group were set up. Detections were conducted 48 hours after transfection: the interfering efficiency of hPTTG1 mRNA was measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction, the expression of survivin gene and survivin protein was examined by semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and Western blot, cell apoptosis was detected by DNA fragmentation gel electrophoresis and propidium iodide staining kit, and the activity of caspase-3 was assayed by caspases colorimetric assay kit. Results The expression of hPTTG1 mRNA was expressly inhibited after hPTTG1 siRNA transfection. DNA ladder was observed in the hPTTG1 siRNA group. The apoptotic rate of hPTTG1 siRNA transfection in the hPTTG1 siRNA group was (17.53±2.17)%, higher than those in the normal group and the negative control group [(8.97±1.56)% and (9.64±1.31)%, respectively], with statistically significant differences between them (P<0.05). The expression levels of survivin mRNA and survivin protein were down-regulated. The activity of caspase-3 was raised. Conclusions siRNA targeting hPTTG1 could induce apoptosis of A2780 by inhibition of survivin expression and activation of caspase-3. It may be a potential target for gene therapy of ovarian cancer.
Ovarian cancer is one of the common malignant tumors of female genital organs. In gynecological tumors, the incidence rate of ovarian cancer ranks the third after cervical cancer and uterine body cancer, but the death rate of ovarian cancer ranks the first, posing a serious threat to women’s life and health. In recent years, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines for ovarian cancer has become an important basis for diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer. In this paper, we interpret the latest version (version 4. 2017) of NCCN clinical practice guidelines for ovarian cancer for its better clinical application.