ObjectiveTo discuss the efficacy and safety of the joint application of oral glucosamine hydrochloride tablets and knee joint cavity ozone injection in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. MethodsFrom January 2014 to January 2015, 72 patients who matched the criteria of moderate knee osteoarthritis were randomly divided into two groups according to the table of random number: oral glucosamine hydrochloride tablet and knee joint cavity ozone injection group (group G+O) and ozone group (group O). Patients of group G+O orally took glucosamine hydrochloride tablets (0.48 g, 3 times/day) for twelve weeks, and ozone was injected into the patients’ knee joint once a week for the first four weeks. The treatment for group O patients was the same with Group G+O, except that the glucosamine hydrochloride tablets were replaced by glucosamine hydrochloride placebo (2 tablets, 3 times/day, taking orally). We recorded the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, Western Ontario & McMaster University (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index score and the adverse reactions before treatment and in the first, third and sixth month after treatment. ResultsPatients’ VAS scores and WOMAC scores of both the two groups in the first, third and sixth month after treatment were significantly different from those before the treatment (P ＜ 0.05) . In the first month after treatment, there were no significant difference in patients’ VAS scores and WOMAC scores between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05) . In the third and sixth month after treatment, there were significant differences in patients’ VAS scores and WOMAC scores between the two groups (P ＜ 0.05) . There was no obvious adverse reactions during the treatment. ConclusionsThe combined application of oral glucosamine hydrochloride tablets and knee joint cavity ozone injection and the ozone treatment for moderate knee osteoarthritis are both effective, without any adverse reaction. The combined treatment of oral glucosamine hydrochloride tablets and knee joint cavity ozone injection on moderate knee osteoarthritis has better long-term efficacy, and it is worth spreading.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of acute and chronic ozone exposure on inflammation,structure and function in murine lung. Methods32 C57/BL6 mice were randomly divided into a single (acute) ozone exposed group,a single air exposed group,a multiple (chronic) ozone exposed group (every three days over 6 weeks),and a multiple air exposed group with 8 mice in each group.The mice were exposed to 2.5 ppm of ozone or air for 3 hours per time and sacrificed 24 hours after the last time of ozone exposure.Lung volume,low attenuation area (LAA) percentage,lung function,cell counts and malondialdehyde (MDA) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF),8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) in serum,inflammation scores and mean linear intercept (Lm) in lung section were assessed. ResultsCompared with the single air exposed group,single (acute) ozone exposure led to increases in inflammatory cells in BALF,inflammation scores in the lung tissue,MDA in BALF and 8-OHdG in serum,but had no effect on lung volume,LAA percentage,airflow or Lm.Compared with the single (acute) ozone exposed group,the single air exposed group and the multiple air exposed group,multiple (chronic) ozone exposure increased inflammatory cells in BALF,lung volume,LAA percentage,total lung capacity and lung compliance,mediated airflow obstruction,and also increased lung inflammation socres and Lm. ConclusionAcute ozone exposure induced airway/lung inflammation and oxidative stress,while chronic ozone exposure induced airway/lung inflammation,emphysema and airflow obstruction.
ObjectiveTo study the possbility of using intranasal instillation of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) combined with inhalation of ozone (O3) to establish mouse model of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE), and to provide a reference for the establishment of CPFE model.MethodsMale C57/BL6 mice were divided randomly into phosphate buffer saline (PBS) intranasal instillation+air inhalation group, PBS intranasal instillation+O3 inhalation group and PM2.5 intranasal instillation+O3 inhalation group, with 8 mice in each group. The mice were intranasally instilled with PBS or PM2.5 suspension (7.8 mg/kg) followed by air or ozone inhalation 24 hours later, twice a week over 8 weeks. Lung function, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) cell counts and classification were detected, the pathological changes of lung tissues in hematoxylin-eosin staining were observed, including inflammation scores and mean linear intercept (Lm). The thickness of collagen deposition in subepithelium was measured in lung tissues in Masson staining, and simultaneously hydroxyproline contents in lung tissues were determined.ResultsCompared to PBS instillation+air inhalation group, inspiratory capacity (IC), total lung capacity (TLC) and chord compliance (Cchord) were increased, FEV25 (the forced expiratory volume at 25 ms)/FVC (forced vital capacity) was decreased, total cell counts in BALF, Lm and lung inflammatory scores were increased, the thickness of the subepithelial collagen layer (SEc/Pbm) or hydroxyproline contents was not changed in PBS instillation +O3 inhalation group; IC was decreased, functional residual capacity (FRC) was increased, TLC was increased, Cchord was decreased, FEV25/FVC and FEV50 (the forced expiratory volume at 50 ms)/FVC were decreased, total cell counts in BALF, Lm, lung inflammatory scores, SEc/Pbm and hydroxyproline contents were increased in PM2.5 instillation+O3 inhalation group. Compared to PBS instillation+O3 inhalation group, IC was decreased, FRC was increased, Cchord was decreased, FEV25/FVC and FEV50/FVC were decreased, total cell counts in BALF, Lm, lung inflammatory scores, SEc/Pbm and hydroxyproline contents were increased in PM2.5 instillation +O3 inhalation group.ConclusionCPFE mouse model can be successfully established by PM2.5 intranasal instillation combined with ozone inhalation for consecutive 8 weeks.