ObjectiveTo explore the application of PDCA (plan, do, check, action) circulation method in basic life support (BLS) technique training among non-medical personnel in hospitals. MethodsIn a third-level grade-A hospital, BLS technique training was carried out for 66 non-medical personnel of various working categories between July and September 2011. During the training process, PDCA circulation method was applied to each step. The existing problems were searched and causes of the problems were found. Improving strategies were made and carried out, and finally, the effect of training was statistically analyzed. ResultsAfter the application of PDCA circulation method, the test scores in the three training stages were significantly different (P ＜ 0.05) . ConclusionPDCA circulation method can help non-medical personnel to master the operation process and the technique points of BLS quickly, and it also can improve the quality of BLS technique training for non-medical personnel in hospitals.
Objective To know the present situation of hand hygiene compliance in medical staff and analyze problems in the management of hand hygiene and related influencing factors, in order to take effective control measures and gradually improve hand hygiene compliance in medical staff. Methods Between January and October 2014 and between January and October 2015, 8-10 healthcare workers respectively from Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Surgery and Department of Rehabilitation were selected to be observed. The healthcare workers between January and October 2014 before the application of plan-do-check-action (PDCA) cycle were regarded as the control group, and hand hygiene observation was performed in October 2014; the healthcare workers between January and October 2015 were regarded as the observation group (after PDCA application), and hand hygiene observation was carried out in October 2015. Under the PDCA cycle, we set up hand hygiene management working group to investigate the hand hygiene work before PDCA cycle was applied. Hand hygiene knowledge survey was carried out. Fishbone diagram was used to find out the causes of poor hand hygiene compliance. Based on these factors, improvement plans of hand hygiene were regulated and implemented. Then, continuous improvement was promoted according to PDCA cycle management process. Results After PDCA implementation, healthcare workers’ hand hygiene compliance (79.67%), correct handwashing rate (94.97%), and hand hygiene compliance before contacting the patients (85.96%), before sterile operation (68.14%), after contacting the patients (78.02%), after contacting patients’ blood or body fluid (85.96%), and after contacting patients’ surroundings (79.14%) were all significantly higher than those before the PDCA implementation (46.39%, 69.62%, 38.42%, 23.20%, 49.14%, 53.78% and 48.39%) (P<0.05). After the implementation of PDCA cycle, the amount of disinfectants consumed per day and the amount of hand sanitizer was 10.13 mL, significantly more than that before PDCA implementation (2.8 mL). The hospital was equipped with full hygiene equipment. Conclusion Applying PDCA cycle for continuous improvement of hand hygiene work can promote the hand hygiene compliance for medical staff.
Objective To analyze the causes of drug dispensing errors and reduce the error rate through scientific precautions, and improve the quality of pharmaceutical service. Methods According to the PDCA cycle, existing problems were found in dispensing between January and June 2013, and the causes were analyzed. Then, from July 2013, strategies were developed to decrease the dispensing error rate. The variation trend of dispensing error rate from January 2013 to June 2017 were observed. Result The dispensing error rate decreased since the beginning of PDCA cycle, from 0.042‰ (the first quarter of 2013) to 0.003‰ (the second quarter of 2017). Conclusion The PDCA cycle is an effective intervention to detect the errors during drug delivery in inpatient pharmacy, which could improve the quality of pharmaceutical service and insure the patients’ safety.
Objective To investigate the method and effect of continuous improvement of adverse drug reaction (ADR) monitoring in a major public hospital’s cooperating branch hospital. Methods PDCA cycle management was used to continuously improve the quality of ADR monitoring. ADR report network platform was established in the fourth quarter of 2014; ADR report specification training for the medical personnel was held in the first quarter of 2015; a examine mechanism was built in the second quarter of 2015. The quality and quantity of ADR monitoring before and after the PDCA cycle management were analyzed. Results ADR report timeliness conform to the requirements increased from 45.5% (from the first to third quarter of 2014) to 98.1% (from the fourth quarter of 2014 to the second quarter of 2015); accurate ADR types checking, normal name writting, and complete process description increased from 68.6%, 65.7%, 8.6% (from January 2014 to Frequency 2015) to 92.9%, 96.4%, 85.7% (from March to June 2015); the quantity of ADR report was obviously improved. Conclusion Learning from public hospital’s experience and considering its own condition in ADR monitoring, cooperating branch hospital utilizes PDCA cycle management which could continuously improve the ADR monitoring.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of PDCA circulation management on pain, psychology and prognosis of patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm in the perioperative period.Methods The clinical data of seventy-six patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm who received perioperative nursing based on PDCA circulation management from April 2016 to March 2017 were retrospective analyzed and these patients were selected as the study group, including 44 males, 32 females, aged 23–65 (47.27±5.87) years. At the same time, 72 patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm who received routine perioperative nursing from April 2015 to March 2016 were selected as the control group, including 41 males, 31 females, aged 24–67 (48.30±5.26) years. The nursing effects of the two groups were compared and analyzed.ResultsThe operation time (t=11.342, P<0.05) and hospitalization time (t=5.986, P<0.05) of the study group were significantly shorter than those of the control group. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of the two groups had no significant difference before nursing (t=0.914, P=0.361), but the VAS scores in the study group after nursing were obviously lower than those in the control group (t=5.475, P<0.05). The self-rating depression scale (SDS, t=1.026, P=0.307) and self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) scores (t=7.866, P<0.05) of the two groups had no significant difference before nursing, while the SDS (t=7.657, P<0.05) and SAS (t=7.866, P<0.05) scores in the study group after nursing were obviously lower than those in the control group. The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (χ2=4.292, P=0.038).ConclusionPDCA circulation management used in patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm in the perioperative period can effectively relieve patients' pain, depression and anxiety, reduce the incidence of adverse reactions, and the prognosis is good.
With the rapid development of information technology, medical reforms in various countries are moving towards informatization, and internet medical projects have been carried out gradually. Internet hospitals, as one of the manifestations of internet medical projects, have the advantages of improving the efficiency of medical services, revitalizing and effectively sinking high-quality medical resources, and therefore has become the focus of China’s next stage of medical reform. However, internet hospitals are innovative and local products of China, leading its practices lack of domestic and foreign theoretical research, as well as experience, which results in government policies and hospital management strategies are both moving forward in groping, and the construction outcomes vary. Therefore, this article aims to analyze the comprehensive dilemmas currently confronted by internet hospitals in China in different stages of construction, operation and management based on PDCA cycle, and thus, puts forward corresponding construction thinking and analysis in a targeted manner, and proposes guidance for the further development of internet hospitals.
Objective To explore the clinical effect of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) combined with PDCA cycle management model in the prevention and control of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in intensive care unit (ICU), and provide evidences for drawing up improvement measures in healthcare-associated MDRO infections in ICU. Methods In January 2020, a risk assessment team was established in the Department of Critical Care Medicine, the First People’s Hospital of Longquanyi District of Chengdu, to analyze the possible risk points of MDRO infections in ICU from then on. FMEA was used to assess risks, and the failure modes with high risk priority numbers were selected to evaluate the high-risk points of MDRO infections. The causes of the high-risk points were analyzed, and improvement measures were formulated to control the risks through PDCA cycle management model. The incidence of healthcare-associated MDRO infections in ICU, improvement of high-risk events, and satisfaction of doctors and nurses after the implementation of intervention measures (from January 2020 to June 2021) were retrospectively collected and compared with those before the implementation of intervention measures (from January 2018 to December 2019). Results Six high-risk factors were screened out, namely single measures of isolation, unqualified cleaning and disinfection of bed units, irrational use of antimicrobial agents, weak consciousness of isolation among newcomers of ICU, weak awareness of pathogen inspection, and untimely disinfection. The incidence of healthcare-associated MDRO infections was 2.71% (49/1800) before intervention and 1.71% (31/1808) after intervention, and the difference between the two periods was statistically significant (χ2=4.224, P=0.040). The pathogen submission rate was 56.67% (1020/1800) before intervention and 61.23% (1107/1808) after intervention, and the difference between the two periods was statistically significant (χ2=7.755, P=0.005). The satisfaction rate of doctors and nurses was 75.0% (30/40) before intervention and 95.0% (38/40) after intervention, and the difference between the two periods was statistically significant (χ2=6.275, P=0.012). Conclusions FMEA can effectively find out the weak points in the prevention and treatment of MDRO infections in ICU, while PDCA model can effectively formulate improvement measures for the weak points and control the risks. The combined application of the two modes provides a scientific and effective guarantee for the rational prevention and treatment of MDRO infections in ICU patients.