Objective To investigate the reading habits of authors of articles published in the Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine (CJEBM) and to compare the findings with those from other surveys. Methods A total of 512 questionnaires were sent to authors who had contributed to CJEBM over the past 7 years. Results A total of 129 questionnaires were returned (response rate 31.6%). The replies showed that the main purpose of reading literature was to keep up with the latest developments in medicine (94% of replies). The main reading material was medical journals (86%). Most respondents (57%) spent more than 3 hours a week reading journals. The biggest problem identified by authors was the lack of full text papers, but the first choice was the electronic versions of the literature. More than half of the authors (57%) said that they spent less time reading than in the past. Conclusion Effective reading of the medical literature is a basic requirement in the practice of evidence-based medicine. It is necessary and important for clinicians and healthcare providers to improve their reading skills and methods.
Objective To compare and review worldwide journals titled “evidence-based” in order to provide an overview of these healthcare journals and suggestions for improving the quality of this type of journal in China and to introduce a quick way for healthcare professionals and patients to obtain high quality clinical evidence. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory, Wanfang and some relevant websites to identify journals titled “evidence-based”. The last issues in 2006 of these kind of journals were analyzed by bibliometric method. Results Twenty-four journals were included. Covering 12 disciplines such as clinical, nursing, health care, etc. They were divided into the primary journals and the secondary journals, published in two languages in six countries. These journals had differences and similarities in their aims, columns and contents, etc. Conclusions Evidence-based medical journals provide the latest developments and the best evidence for healthcare professionals in their own fields, save their time in searching for and reading information, and provide ideas for improving the quality of similar journals in our country.